Investigation of the Magnetization Mechanism and Optimal Axial Length of Ring-Type Permanent Magnet Magnetizers Based on Coupled Demagnetization Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Open-loop permanent magnet magnetizers are widely employed in magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing of steel wire ropes due to their structural simplicity and operational convenience. However, the underlying magnetization mechanism remains inadequately understood, and systematic investigations into their optimal structural configurations are still lacking. In this study, a combined approach of finite element simulation and experimental validation is utilized to systematically examine the influence of axial length on the magnetization performance of ring-type permanent magnet magnetizers for steel wire ropes modeled as equivalent steel tubes. The results reveal a nonlinear relationship between axial length and the peak axial magnetic flux density in air: the intensity initially increases and then decreases with length. In contrast, both the magnetic field uniformity and the effective magnetization region improve monotonically with increasing length. These two mechanisms jointly modulate the internal magnetization state of the tube, giving rise to an optimal axial length. Further analysis confirms that for a steel wire rope with a diameter of 50 mm (or its equivalent tube), the optimal axial length range of the open-ring magnetizer lies between 95 mm and 110 mm, within which an optimal balance between field strength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Electric Motor Design and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhou, P., Zhou, G., Zhu, Z., He, Z., Ding, X., Tang, C.: A review of Non-Destructive damage detection methods for steel wire ropes. Appl. Sci. 9, 2771 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app913277110.3390/app9132771 ↗
2. Weischedel, H.R., Ramsey, R.P.: Electromagnetic testing, a reliable method for the inspection of wire ropes in service. NDT Int. 22, 155–161 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-9126(89)90003-510.1016/0308-9126(89)90003-5 ↗
3. Feng, B., Wu, J., Tu, H., Tang, J., Kang, Y.: A review of magnetic flux leakage nondestructive testing. Materials. 15, 7362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1520736210.3390/ma15207362 ↗
4. Li, E., Chen, Y., Yuan, Z., Wang, J.: Train wheel magnetic flux leakage testing method based on local magnetization enhancement. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 1–9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.325139310.1109/TIM.2023.3251393 ↗
5. Wang, P., Gao, Y., Tian, G., Wang, H.: Velocity effect analysis of dynamic magnetization in high speed magnetic flux leakage inspection. NDT E Int. 64, 7–12 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.02.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2014.02.001 ↗
6. Wang, R., Kang, Y., Tang, J., Zhao, W., Feng, B., Song, K.: Analysis of the mechanism of leakage magnetic field generated by internal defects. J. Nondestruct Eval. 42, 31 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-023-00941-110.1007/s10921-023-00941-1 ↗
7. Shi, Y., Zhang, C., Li, R., Cai, M., Jia, G.: Theory and application of magnetic flux leakage pipeline detection. Sensors. 15, 31036–31055 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s15122984510.3390/s151229845 ↗
8. Wu, J., Fang, H., Huang, X., Xia, H., Kang, Y., Tang, C.: An online MFL sensing method for steel pipe based on the magnetic guiding effect. Sensors. 17, 2911 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1712291110.3390/s17122911 ↗
9. Ren, L., Liu, W., Zhu, B., Tian, G., Lu, H., Yan, L.: Quantitative evaluation of deformation in High-Speed magnetic flux leakage signals for weld defects in oil and gas pipelines. Processes. 12, 2396 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1211239610.3390/pr12112396 ↗
10. Kara, O., Çelik, H.H.: A novel nonlinear magnetic equivalent circuit model for magnetic flux leakage system. Appl. Sci. 14, 4071 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1410407110.3390/app14104071 ↗
11. Lam, Q.M., Duong, V.T., Phan, H.L., Nguyen, T.T., Nguyen, H.H.: Parametric design methodology for yoke-magnetization in magnetic flux leakage detection systems. Results Eng. 23, 102669 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10266910.1016/j.rineng.2024.102669 ↗
12. Liu, S., Sun, Y., Ma, W.: A new method of SHM for steel wire rope and its apparatus. In: Rivas-Lopez, M., Fuentes, W.F., Sergiyenko, O. (eds.) Structural Health Monitoring. IntechOpen, Rijeka (2017)
13. Jomdecha, C., Prateepasen, A.: Design of modified electromagnetic main-flux for steel wire rope inspection. NDT E Int. 42, 77–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.10.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2007.10.006 ↗
14. Ni, Y., Zhang, Q., Xin, R.: Magnetic flux detection and identification of Bridge cable metal area loss damage. Measurement. 167, 108443 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10844310.1016/j.measurement.2020.108443 ↗
15. Pham, H.Q., Trinh, Q.T., Doan, D.T., Tran, Q.H.: Importance of magnetizing field on magnetic flux leakage signal of defects. IEEE Trans. Magn. 54, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2018.280967110.1109/TMAG.2018.2809671 ↗
16. Norouzi, E., Ravanbod, H.: Optimisation of the flux distribution in magnetic flux leakage testing. Insight - Non-Destr. Test. Cond Monit. 51, 563–567 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2009.51.10.56310.1784/insi.2009.51.10.563 ↗
17. Wang, H., Xu, Z., Hua, G., Tian, J., Zhou, B., Lu, Y., Chen, F.: Key technique of a detection sensor for coal mine wire ropes. Min. Sci. Technol. China. 19, 170–175 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60032-610.1016/S1674-5264(09)60032-6 ↗
18. Kaur, A., Gupta, A., Aggarwal, H., Arora, K., Garg, N., Sharma, M., Sharma, S., Aggarwal, N., Sapra, G., Goswamy, J.K.: Non-destructive evaluation and development of a new wire rope tester using Parallely magnetized NdFeB magnet segments. J. Nondestruct Eval. 37, 61 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0516-y10.1007/s10921-018-0516-y ↗
19. Zhang, Y., Jing, L., Xu, W., Zhan, W., Tan, J.: A sensor for broken wire detection of steel wire ropes based on the magnetic concentrating principle. Sensors. 19, 3763 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1917376310.3390/s19173763 ↗
20. Tian, J., Wang, H.: Research on magnetic excitation model of magnetic flux leakage for coal mine hoisting wire rope. Adv. Mech. Eng. 7, 1687814015618626 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/168781401561862610.1177/1687814015618626 ↗
21. Liu, W., Ren, L., Tian, G.: Study on the impact of pole spacing on magnetic flux leakage detection under oversaturated magnetization. Sensors. 24, 5195 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2416519510.3390/s24165195 ↗
22. Sun, Y., Kang, Y.: Magnetic compression effect in present MFL testing sensor. Sens. Actuators Phys. 160, 54–59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2010.03.03810.1016/j.sna.2010.03.038 ↗
23. Sun, Y., Liu, S., Li, R., Ye, Z., Kang, Y., Chen, S.: A new magnetic flux leakage sensor based on open magnetizing method and its on-line automated structural health monitoring methodology. Struct. Health Monit. 14, 583–603 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/147592171560438710.1177/1475921715604387 ↗
24. Jiang, X., Sun, Y., Feng, B., Liu, M., Jiang, X., Li, R., He, L., Kang, Y.: New On-Line MFL testing method and apparatus for winding mine Hoist wire rope. Appl. Sci. 12, 6970 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1214697010.3390/app12146970 ↗
25. Varga, E., Beyer, A.: Magnetic field of a uniformly magnetized Hollow cylinder. IEEE Trans. Magn. 34, 613–618 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.66805310.1109/20.668053 ↗
26. Wu, J., Wu, W., Li, E., Kang, Y.: Magnetic flux leakage course of inner defects and its detectable depth. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 34, 63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-021-00579-y10.1186/s10033-021-00579-y ↗
27. Chen, D.-X., Brug, J.A., Goldfarb, R.B.: Demagnetizing factors for cylinders. IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 3601–3619 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.10293210.1109/20.102932 ↗
28. Coey, J.M.D.: Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Cambridge University Press (2010)
29. Ravaud, R., Lemarquand, G., Lemarquand, V., Depollier, C.: Analytical calculation of the magnetic field created by Permanent-Magnet rings. IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 1982–1989 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2008.92309610.1109/TMAG.2008.923096 ↗
30. Masiero, F.: ApeParrot/Magnetic-Field-Modeling. Magnetic-Field-Modeling (2025). https://github.com/ApeParrot/
31. Matyuk, V.F., Osipov, A.A., Strelyukhin, A.V.: Central demagnetization coefficient for Hollow cylindrical bars made of soft magnetic materials. Russ J. Nondestruct Test. 43, 154–162 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183090703004710.1134/S1061830907030047 ↗