Frequency-Optimized Ultrasonic and Machine Learning Framework for Early Detection of Carburization in HP Steel Tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Hafidz, M., Lantang, Y.S.F., Ardy, H.: Microstructural characterization of HP50 stainless steel tube from ethylene plant radiant furnace after 4 years of operation. Mater. Today. Proc. 66, 3107–3111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.01210.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.012 ↗
2. Han, Z., Cao, L., Wang, L., Du, C., Qian, X., Xie, G.: Material degradation analysis and reliability assessment of residual life for service-exposed reformer tubes. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 29, 5458–5466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05033-z10.1007/s11665-020-05033-z ↗
3. Alvino, A., Lega, D., Giacobbe, F., Mazzocchi, V., Rinaldi, A.: Damage characterization in two reformer heater tubes after nearly 10 years of service at different operative and maintenance conditions. Eng. Fail. Anal. 17, 1526–1541 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.06.00310.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.06.003 ↗
4. Guo, J., Cao, T., Cheng, C., Zhao, J.: Mechanism of M 23 C 6 → M 7 C 3 carbides reaction of Cr35Ni45Nb type alloy during carburization. Mater. Res. Express. 8, 096528 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac286c10.1088/2053-1591/ac286c ↗
5. Bowler, A.L., Pound, M.P., Watson, N.J.: A review of ultrasonic sensing and machine learning methods to monitor industrial processes. Ultrasonics 124, 106776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10677610.1016/j.ultras.2022.106776 ↗
6. Durodola, J.F.: Machine learning for design, phase transformation and mechanical properties of alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 123, 100797 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10079710.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100797 ↗
7. das Neves, E.C., do Nascimento, E.G., Sacilotto, D.G., Ferreira, J.Z., Braz Medeiros, J.L., Biehl, L.V., Braga Lemos, G.V., Damas Martins, C.O., de Jesus Pacheco, D.A.: Nondestructive analysis of corrosion in ageing hardened AA6351 aluminium alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 291, 126664 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12666410.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126664 ↗
8. Tzeng, Y.-C., Chen, R.-Y., Lee, S.-L.: Nondestructive tests on the effect of Mg content on the corrosion and mechanical properties of 5000 series aluminum alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 259, 124202 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12420210.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124202 ↗
9. Dharmadhikari, S., Bhattacharya, C., Ray, A., Basak, A.: A data-driven framework for early-stage fatigue damage detection in aluminum alloys using ultrasonic sensors. Machines 9, 211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/machines910021110.3390/machines9100211 ↗
10. Drury, J., Marino, A.: A Comparison of the Magnetic Flux Leakage and Ultrasonic Methods in the detection and measurement of corrosion pitting in ferrous plate and pipe. In: 15th World Conference on NDT - 2000 - Rome (Italy). e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing. , Rome (2000)
11. Blaow, M.M., Shaw, B.A.: Magnetic Barkhausen noise profile analysis: effect of excitation field strength and detection coil sensitivity in case carburized steel. Mater. Sci. Appl. 05, 258–266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2014.5503010.4236/msa.2014.55030 ↗
12. Toozandehjani, M., Matori, K.A., Ostovan, F., Mustapha, F., Zahari, N.I., Oskoueian, A.: On the correlation between microstructural evolution and ultrasonic properties: a review. J. Mater. Sci. 50, 2643–2665 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8855-x10.1007/s10853-015-8855-x ↗
13. Ruiz, A., Rodríguez, V.M., Becerra, H.G., Kim, J.-Y.: Ultrasonic characterization of microstructural changes due to static recrystallization and grain growth in Inconel 625 and Inconel 718 superalloys. Ultrasonics 142, 107383 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2024.10738310.1016/j.ultras.2024.107383 ↗
14. Shi, S., Jin, S., Zhang, D., Liao, J., Fu, D., Lin, L.: Improving ultrasonic testing by using machine learning framework based on model interpretation strategy. Chinese. J. Mech. Eng. 36, 127 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-023-00960-z10.1186/s10033-023-00960-z ↗
15. Paz da Silva, F., Matos, R.S., da Fonseca Filho, H.D., da Silva, M.R.P., Ţălu, Ş, dos Santos, Y.T.B., da Silva, I.C., Martins, C.O.D.: Non-destructive ultrasonic testing and machine learning-assisted early detection of carburizing damage in HP steel pyrolysis furnace tubes. Measurement. 218, 113221 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11322110.1016/j.measurement.2023.113221 ↗
16. Rodrigues, L.F.M., Cruz, F.C., Oliveira, M.A., SimasFilho, E.F., Albuquerque, M.C.S., Silva, I.C., Farias, C.T.T.: Carburization level identification in industrial HP pipes using ultrasonic evaluation and machine learning. Ultrasonics 94, 145–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.10.00510.1016/j.ultras.2018.10.005 ↗
17. Bowler, A.L., Bakalis, S., Watson, N.J.: Monitoring mixing processes using ultrasonic sensors and machine learning. Sensors 20, 1813 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2007181310.3390/s20071813 ↗
18. Mousavi, M., Gandomi, A.H., Holloway, D., Berry, A., Chen, F.: Machine learning analysis of features extracted from time–frequency domain of ultrasonic testing results for wood material assessment. Constr. Build. Mater. 342, 127761 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12776110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127761 ↗
19. Cruz, F.C., SimasFilho, E.F., Albuquerque, M.C.S., Silva, I.C., Farias, C.T.T., Gouvêa, L.L.: Efficient feature selection for neural network based detection of flaws in steel welded joints using ultrasound testing. Ultrasonics 73, 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.01710.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.017 ↗
20. Dhilip, A., Nampoothiri, J., Senthilkumar, M., Kirubanandan, N.: Machine learning predictive approaches for hot crack mitigation in modified TIG welded AA7075 joints. Mater. Manuf. Process. 38, 1650–1662 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.214671310.1080/10426914.2022.2146713 ↗
21. A, D., Nampoothiri, J., K, S.: Leveraging Machine Learning to Predict Welding Quality in Ultrasonically Assisted TIG Welded Inconel 625 Joints. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-11316-010.1007/s11665-025-11316-0 ↗
22. Yan, X.-L., Dong, S.-Y., Xu, B.-S., Cao, Y.: Progress and challenges of ultrasonic testing for stress in remanufacturing laser cladding coating. Mater. (Basel). 11, 293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1102029310.3390/ma11020293 ↗
23. Towsyfyan, H., Biguri, A., Boardman, R., Blumensath, T.: Successes and challenges in non-destructive testing of aircraft composite structures. Chinese. J. Aeronaut. 33, 771–791 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.01710.1016/j.cja.2019.09.017 ↗
24. Olisa, S.C., Khan, M.A., Starr, A.: Review of current Guided Wave Ultrasonic Testing (GWUT) limitations and future directions. Sensors 21, 811 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2103081110.3390/s21030811 ↗
25. Svilainis, L., Lukoseviciute, K., Dumbrava, V., Chaziachmetovas, A.: Subsample interpolation bias error in time of flight estimation by direct correlation in digital domain. Measurement 46, 3950–3958 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.07.03810.1016/j.measurement.2013.07.038 ↗
26. Wronkowicz, A., Dragan, K., Lis, K.: Assessment of uncertainty in damage evaluation by ultrasonic testing of composite structures. Compos. Struct. 203, 71–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.10910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.109 ↗
27. de Assis, M.K.M., Souza, R.M., Costa-Félix, R.P.B., Alvarenga, A.V.: Assessment of ultrasonic properties of an agarose phantom at the frequency range 2.25 MHz to 10 MHz. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1826, 012005 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1826/1/01200510.1088/1742-6596/1826/1/012005 ↗
28. Honarvar, F., Varvani-Farahani, A.: A review of ultrasonic testing applications in additive manufacturing: Defect evaluation, material characterization, and process control. Ultrasonics 108, 106227 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10622710.1016/j.ultras.2020.106227 ↗
29. Tan, C., Krishnan, K., Elumalai, N.K.: Corrosion behaviour of heat-treated cold spray nickel chromium/chromium carbides. Metals. (Basel). 14, 1153 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/met1410115310.3390/met14101153 ↗
30. Zhao, Y., Gong, J., Yong, J., Wang, X., Shen, L., Li, Q.: Creep behaviours of Cr25Ni35Nb and Cr35Ni45Nb alloys predicted by modified theta method. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 649, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.03610.1016/j.msea.2015.09.036 ↗
31. ASTM: Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size, https://www.astm.org/e0112-96r04.html
32. Baran, B., Majerek, D., Szyszka, P., Wójcik, D., Rymarczyk, T.: Ultrasound tomography enhancement by signal feature extraction with modular machine learning method. PLoS. ONE. 19, e0297496 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.029749610.1371/journal.pone.0297496 ↗
33. Ochoa-Dominguez, H., Rao, K.R.: Discrete Cosine Transform. CRC Press (2019)10.1201/9780203729854 ↗
34. Fiscon, G., Weitschek, E., Cialini, A., Felici, G., Bertolazzi, P., De Salvo, S., Bramanti, A., Bramanti, P., De Cola, M.C.: Combining EEG signal processing with supervised methods for Alzheimer’s patients classification. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 18, 35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0613-y10.1186/s12911-018-0613-y ↗
35. Ali, L., Khan, S.U., Golilarz, N.A., Yakubu, I., Qasim, I., Noor, A., Nour, R.: A Feature-Driven Decision Support System for Heart Failure Prediction Based on χ 2 Statistical Model and Gaussian Naive Bayes. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2019, 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/631432810.1155/2019/6314328 ↗
36. Islam, R., Devnath, M.K., Samad, M.D., Jaffrey Al Kadry, S.M.: GGNB: Graph-based Gaussian naive Bayes intrusion detection system for CAN bus. Veh. Commun. 33, 100442 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2021.10044210.1016/j.vehcom.2021.100442 ↗
37. Altay, O., Ulas, M., Alyamac, K.E.: Prediction of the Fresh Performance of Steel Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete Using Quadratic SVM and Weighted KNN Models. IEEE Access. 1–1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.299456210.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994562 ↗
38. Fopa, M., Gueye, M., Ndiaye, S., Naacke, H.: A parameter-free KNN for rating prediction. Data. Knowl. Eng. 142, 102095 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.10209510.1016/j.datak.2022.102095 ↗
39. Masood, H., Farooq, H.: Utilizing spatio temporal gait pattern and quadratic SVM for gait recognition. Electronics 11, 2386 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics1115238610.3390/electronics11152386 ↗
40. Davoudi Kakhki, F., Freeman, S.A., Mosher, G.A.: Evaluating machine learning performance in predicting injury severity in agribusiness industries. Saf. Sci. 117, 257–262 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.02610.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.026 ↗
41. Mohammadi, M., Rashid, T.A., Karim, S.H.T., Aldalwie, A.H.M., Tho, Q.T., Bidaki, M., Rahmani, A.M., Hosseinzadeh, M.: A comprehensive survey and taxonomy of the SVM-based intrusion detection systems. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 178, 102983 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.10298310.1016/j.jnca.2021.102983 ↗
42. Flah, M., Ragab, M., Lazhari, M., Nehdi, M.L.: Localization and classification of structural damage using deep learning single-channel signal-based measurement. Autom. Constr. 139, 104271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10427110.1016/j.autcon.2022.104271 ↗
43. Xu, J., Zhang, Y., Miao, D.: Three-way confusion matrix for classification: A measure driven view. Inf. Sci. (Ny) 507, 772–794 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.06410.1016/j.ins.2019.06.064 ↗
44. Silva, L.C., SimasFilho, E.F., Albuquerque, M.C.S., Silva, I.C., Farias, C.T.T.: Segmented analysis of time-of-flight diffraction ultrasound for flaw detection in welded steel plates using extreme learning machines. Ultrasonics 102, 106057 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2019.10605710.1016/j.ultras.2019.106057 ↗
45. Guo, J., Cao, T., Cheng, C., Meng, X., Zhao, J.: Effect of carburization (pyrolysis furnace tube main failure factor) on the microstructure and properties of HPNb alloy tube. Eng. Fail. Anal. 115, 104610 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10461010.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104610 ↗
46. McLeod, A.C., Bishop, C.M., Stevens, K.J., Kral, M.V.: Microstructural characterization and image analysis in ex-service HP alloy stainless steel tubes for ethylene pyrolysis. Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal. 5, 178–187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-016-0274-010.1007/s13632-016-0274-0 ↗
47. Ono, K.: A comprehensive report on ultrasonic attenuation of engineering materials, including metals, ceramics, polymers, fiber-reinforced composites, wood, and rocks. Appl. Sci. 10, 2230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1007223010.3390/app10072230 ↗
48. Krautkrämer, J., Krautkrämer, H.: Ultrasonic Testing of Materials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (1990)10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8 ↗
49. Tao, L., Ogihara, M.: Content-based music similarity search and emotion detection. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. pp. V-705–8. IEEE10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1327208 ↗
50. Hsu, C.-H., Teng, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-J.: Relationship between ultrasonic characteristics and mechanical properties of tempered martensitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 13, 593–599 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1361/1547702042082810.1361/15477020420828 ↗
51. Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann (Elsevier), Waltham (2012)
52. Carbol, L., Kusak, I., Martinek, J., Vojkuvkova, P.: Influence of transducer coupling in ultrasonic testing. In: NDT in Progress 2015 - 8th International Workshop of NDT Experts, Proceedings. pp. 23–29 (2015)
53. Sörnmo, L., Laguna, P.: Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications. Elsevier (2005)10.1016/B978-012437552-9/50003-9 ↗
54. Krauss, G.: Steels: Processing, Structure, and Performance. ASM International (2015)10.31399/asm.tb.spsp2.9781627082655 ↗
55. Randall, R.B., Antoni, J.: Rolling element bearing diagnostics—a tutorial. Mech. Syst. Signal. Process. 25, 485–520 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.01710.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.017 ↗
56. Oliveira, M.A., SimasFilho, E.F., Albuquerque, M.C.S., Santos, Y.T.B., da Silva, I.C., Farias, C.T.T.: Ultrasound-based identification of damage in wind turbine blades using novelty detection. Ultrasonics 108, 106166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10616610.1016/j.ultras.2020.106166 ↗
57. Ang, E.Y.M., Paw, Y.C.: Efficient linear predictive model with short term features for lithium-ion batteries state of health estimation. J. Energy. Storage. 44, 103409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.10340910.1016/j.est.2021.103409 ↗
58. Jodhani, J., Handa, A., Gautam, A., Ashwni, Rana, R.: Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation of composites: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 78, 627–632 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.05510.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.055 ↗
59. Karafi, M.R., Khorasani, F.: Evaluation of mechanical and electric power losses in a typical piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer. Sens. Actuators. A. Phys. 288, 156–164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.12.04410.1016/j.sna.2018.12.044 ↗
60. Yang, X., Verboven, E., Ju, B., Kersemans, M.: Comparative study of ultrasonic techniques for reconstructing the multilayer structure of composites. NDT. E. Int. 121, 102460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10246010.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102460 ↗