Characterization of Ultrasonic Transducer Response Using Laser Doppler Interferometer in kHz-Range for Civil Engineering Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Flow Measurement and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM International (2020) "E1316–20 standard terminology for nondestructive examinations." .
2. Schmerr, L.W., Song, S.: Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation Systems. Springer US, New York, NY (2007)10.1007/978-0-387-49063-2 ↗
3. Wiciak, P., Cascante, G., Polak, M.A.: "Frequency and geometry effects on ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements of concrete specimens. MJ 117(2), 205–216 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14359/5172239910.14359/51722399 ↗
4. Stauffer, J.D., Woodward, C.B., White, K.R.: Nonlinear ultrasonic testing with resonant and pulse velocity parameters for early damage in concrete. MJ 102(2), 118–121 (2005). https://doi.org/10.14359/1430510.14359/14305 ↗
5. Bittner, J.A., Popovics, J.S.: Direct imaging of moisture effects during slow dynamic nonlinearity. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.506390410.1063/1.5063904 ↗
6. Eiras, J.N., et al.: Non-classical nonlinear feature extraction from standard resonance vibration data for damage detection. J Acoust Soc Am 135(2), EL82–EL87 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.486288210.1121/1.4862882 ↗
7. Eiras, J.N., et al.: Effect of carbonation on the linear and nonlinear dynamic properties of cement-based materials. Opt. Eng. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.55.1.01100410.1117/1.OE.55.1.011004 ↗
8. Eiras, J.N., et al.: Cement-based material characterization using nonlinear single-impact resonant acoustic spectroscopy (NSIRAS). In: Kund, T. (ed.) Nonlinear Ultrasonic and Vibro-Acoustical Techniques for Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Cham (2018)
9. Snieder, R.: The theory of coda wave interferometry. Pure Appl. Geophys. 163(2), 455–473 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-005-0026-610.1007/s00024-005-0026-6 ↗
10. Dai, S., Wuttke, F., Santamarina, J.C.: Coda wave analysis to monitor processes in soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139(9), 1504–1511 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000087210.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000872 ↗
11. Planès, T., Larose, E.: A review of ultrasonic coda wave interferometry in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 53, 248–255 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.07.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2013.07.009 ↗
12. Philippidis, T.P., Aggelis, D.G.: Experimental study of wave dispersion and attenuation in concrete. Ultrasonics 43(7), 584–595 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.00110.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.001 ↗
13. Chaix, J., Garnier, V., Corneloup, G.: Ultrasonic wave propagation in heterogeneous solid media: theoretical analysis and experimental validation. Ultrasonics 44(2), 200–210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2005.11.00210.1016/j.ultras.2005.11.002 ↗
14. Kirlangic, A.S., Cascante, G., Polak, M.A.: Condition assessment of cementitious materials using surface waves in ultrasonic frequency range. Geotechn. Test. J. 38(2), 139–149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ2014001110.1520/GTJ20140011 ↗
15. Kirlangic, A.S., Cascante, G., Polak, M.A.: Assessment of concrete beams with irregular defects using surface waves. ACI Mater. J. 113(1), 73 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1359/516880710.1359/5168807 ↗
16. Moss, B.C., Scruby, C.B.: Investigation of ultrasonic transducers using optical techniques. Ultrasonics 26, 179–188 (1988)10.1016/0041-624X(88)90065-0 ↗
17. Erikson, K.: Pulse-echo ultrasonic transducer characterization. T-Su 26(1), 1 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1109/T-SU.1979.3105610.1109/T-SU.1979.31056 ↗
18. Erikson, K.: Tone-burst testing of pulse-echo transducers. T-Su 26(1), 7–13 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1109/T-SU.1979.3105810.1109/T-SU.1979.31058 ↗
19. Papadakis, E.P.: Theoretical and experimental methods to evaluate ultrasonic transducers for inspection and diagnostic applications. T-Su 26(1), 14–27 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1109/T-SU.1979.3105910.1109/T-SU.1979.31059 ↗
20. Miller, E.B., Eitzen, D.G.: Ultrasonic transducer characterization at the NBS. T-Su 26(1), 28–36 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1109/T-SU.1979.3106010.1109/T-SU.1979.31060 ↗
21. Chivers, R.C.: Time-delay spectrometry for ultrasonic transducer characterization. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 19(10), 834–843 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3735/19/10/01510.1088/0022-3735/19/10/015 ↗
22. ASTM International (2014) "E1065/E1065M-14 standard guide for evaluating characteristics of ultrasonic search units.".
23. Wang, T., Cheung, F., Butera, M.: An automated digital beam profile system for ultrasonic transducer characterization. NDT and E Int. 25(4), 171–176 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8695(92)90157-C10.1016/0963-8695(92)90157-C ↗
24. Obaidat, M.S., Abu-Saymeh, D.S.: Methodologies for characterizing ultrasonic transducers using neural network and pattern recognition techniques. Tie 39(6), 529–536 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1109/41.17097210.1109/41.170972 ↗
25. Obaidat, M.S., Khalid, H., Sadoun, B.: Ultrasonic transducer characterization by neural networks. Inf. Sci. 107(1), 195–215 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(97)10048-210.1016/S0020-0255(97)10048-2 ↗
26. Schmerr, L.W., Lopez-Sanchez, A., Huang, R.: Complete ultrasonic transducer characterization and its use for models and measurements. Ultrasonics 44, e753–e757 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.08810.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.088 ↗
27. Wolf, F., et al.: Finite element modeling of ultrasonic transducer by utilizing an inverse scheme for the determination of its material parameters. Ultsym (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.018810.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0188 ↗
28. Canney, M., et al.: Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: A combined measurement and modeling approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124(4), 2406–2420 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.296783610.1121/1.2967836 ↗
29. Fei, C., et al.: Fabrication and characterization of high-sensitivity ultrasonic transducers with functionally graded design. Jsen 19(16), 6650–6654 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.290562510.1109/JSEN.2019.2905625 ↗
30. Tallavo, F., Cascante, G., Pandey, M.D.: Ultrasonic transducers characterisation for evaluation of stiff geomaterials. Geotechnique 61(6), 501–510 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.08710.1680/geot.9.P.087 ↗
31. Kirlangic, A.S., Cascante, G., Polak, M.A.: Characterization of piezoelectric accelerometers beyond the nominal frequency range. Geotech. Test. J. 40(1), 37–46 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ2015009110.1520/GTJ20150091 ↗
32. Mahbaz, S., Cascante, G., Dusseault, M.B.: Calibration of a piezoelectric transducer through laser measurements and numerical simulation. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 24(1), 39–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG24.1.3910.2113/JEEG24.1.39 ↗
33. Feeney, A., et al.: Dynamic nonlinearity in piezoelectric flexural ultrasonic transducers. Jsen 19(15), 6056–6066 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.291115810.1109/JSEN.2019.2911158 ↗
34. Feeney, A., et al.: The influence of air pressure on the dynamics of flexural ultrasonic transducers. Sensors (Base, Switzerland) 19(21), 4710 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1921471010.3390/s19214710 ↗
35. Eriksson, T.J.R., Ramadas, S.N., Dixon, S.M.: Ultrasonics. Ultrasonics 65, 242–248 (2015)10.1016/j.ultras.2015.09.018 ↗
36. A. W. Leissa (1969) Vibration of plates. 160.
37. Daubechies, I., Lu, J., Wu, H.: Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: an empirical mode decomposition-like tool. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 30(2), 243–261 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2010.08.00210.1016/j.acha.2010.08.002 ↗
38. Thakur, G., et al.: The synchrosqueezing algorithm for time-varying spectral analysis: Robustness properties and new paleoclimate applications. Signal Process. 93(5), 1079–1094 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.11.02910.1016/j.sigpro.2012.11.029 ↗
39. ASTM International (2016) "C597–16 standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete."