Techniques for Neutron Stress Determination with High Spatial Resolution
Source abstract
Abstract
A number of sub-surface strain measurement problems require spatial resolutions of the order of 10−1 mm to be meaningful. The use of neutron diffraction can be both time effective and otherwise advantageous compared to synchrotron diffraction if measurement directions and beam shapes are chosen such that scattered intensity is maximized. The first point refers to those directions and specimen orientations for which the gage volume orientation can be kept constant. They can be chosen such that preferred orientation boosts the diffracted intensity. The second point refers to the shaping of the incident beam for maximizing the illuminated volume in the material even for curved specimens. Guidelines and limitations of such high spatial resolution measurements are discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Physics and Applications · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Gnäupel-Herold, T., Haeffner, D.R., Prask, H.J., Matejicek, J.: In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Residual Stresses (ICRS-6), Oxford, July 10–12, 2000, pp. 751–758
2. Gnaeupel-Herold, T., Prask, H.J., Fields, R.J., Foecke, T.J., Xia, Z.C., Lienert, U.: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 366, 104–113 (2004)10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.059 ↗
3. Pyzalla, A.: J. Nondestruct. Eval. 19, 21–31 (2000)10.1023/A:1006664007726 ↗
4. Reimers, W., Broda, M., Brusch, G., Dantz, D., Liss, K.-D., Pyzalla, A., Schmackers, T., Tschentscher, T.: J. Nondestruct. Eval. 17, 129–140 (1998)
5. Luzin, V., Gnäupel-Herold, T., Prask, H.J.: Mater. Sci. Forum 408–412, 407–412 (2002)10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.408-412.407 ↗
6. Gnaeupel-Herold, T., Foecke, T.J., Prask, H.J., Fields, R.J.: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 399, 26–32 (2005)10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.017 ↗
7. Mildner, D.F.R., Chen-Mayer, H.H., Gibson, W.M., Gnäupel-Herold, T., Miller, M.E., Prask, H.J., Schultz, A.J., Vitt, R., Youngman, R.: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 1985–1993 (2002)10.1063/1.1470236 ↗
8. Gibson, W.M., Schultz, A.J., Chen-Mayer, H.H., Mildner, D.F.R., Gnäupel-Herold, T., Miller, M.E., Prask, H.J., Vitt, R., Youngman, R., Carpenter, J.M.: J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 677–683 (2002)10.1107/S0021889802014917 ↗
9. Gnäupel-Herold, T.: J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 192–197 (2009)10.1107/S0021889809004300 ↗
10. Wang, X.-L., Spooner, S., Hubbard, C.: J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 52–59 (1998)10.1107/S0021889897008261 ↗
11. Oliveira, M.C., Baptista, A.J., Alves, J.L., Menezes, L.F., Green, D.E., Gnaeupel-Herold, T., Iadicola, M.A., Foecke, T., Stoughton, T.B.: In: Santos, A.D., Barata da Rocha, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Deep Drawing Research Group 2006 Conference, June 19–21, 2006, Porto, Portugal, pp. 279–286
12. Green, D.E., Stoughton, T.B., Gnaeupel-Herold, T., Iadicola, M.A., Foecke, T.: In: Santos, A.D., Barata da Rocha, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Deep Drawing Research Group 2006 Conference, June 19–21, 2006, Porto, Portugal, pp. 559–566 (2006)
13. Hauk, V. (ed.): Structural and Residual Stress Analysis by Nondestructive Methods. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997), pp. 178–180
14. Ortner, B., Antretter, T., Hofmann, M., Werner, E.: Mater. Sci. Forum 571–572, 225–229 (2008)10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.571-572.225 ↗