A Study on the Use of XCT and FEA to Predict the Elastic Behavior of Additively Manufactured Parts of Cylindrical Geometry
Source abstract
Abstract
Defining general criteria for the acceptability of defects within industrial components is often complicated, since the specific load conditions and the criticality of the given application should be considered individually. In order to minimize the risk of failure, high safety factors are commonly adopted during quality control. However this practice is likely to cause the rejection of components whose defects would be instead acceptable if a more sound knowledge of the component behaviour were achieved. Parts produced by additive manufacturing (AM) may suffer from various defects, including micro- or macro-holes, delamination and microstructural discontinuities. Such processes, which are specially suitable for one-off components, require robust and reliable inspection before a part is accepted or rejected, since the refusal of even a single part at the end of the production process represents a significant loss. For this reason, it would be very useful to simulate in a reliable way whether a certain defect is truly detrimental to the proper working of the part during operation or whether the component can still be used, despite the presence of a defect. To this purpose, the paper highlights the benefits of a synergistic interaction between Industrial X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and finite element analysis (FEA). Internal defects of additively manufactured parts can be identified in a non-destructive way by means of XCT. Then FEA can be performed on the XCT-based virtual model of the real component, rather than on the ideal CAD geometry. A proof of concept of this approach is proposed here for a reference construct produced in an Aluminium alloy by AM. Numerical results of the proposed combined XCT–FEA procedure are contrasted with experimental data from tensile tests. The findings sustain the reliability of the method and allow to assess its full provisional accuracy for parts of cylindrical geometry designed to operate in the elastic field. The paper moves a step beyond the present application limits of tomography as it is currently employed for AM parts and it evidences instead the possibility of extending the usage of tomography to acceptance testing and prediction of operative behaviour.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Atzeni, E., Salmi, A.: Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable, metal parts. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 62, 1147–1155 (2012)10.1007/s00170-011-3878-1 ↗
2. Mengucci, P., Gatto, A., Bassoli, E., Denti, L., Fiori, F., Girardin, E., Barucca, G.: Effects of build orientation and element partitioning on microstructure and mechanical properties of biomedical Ti-6Al-4 V alloy produced by laser sintering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 71, 1–9 (2017)10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.025 ↗
3. Weller, C., Kleer, R., Piller, F.T.: Economic implications of 3D printing: market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164, 43–56 (2015)10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.020 ↗
4. Xu, Z., Hyde, C.J., Thompson, A., Leach, R.K., Maskery, I., Tuck, C., Clare, A.T.: Staged thermomechanical testing of nickel superalloys produced by selective laser melting. Mater. Des. 133, 520–527 (2017)10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.009 ↗
5. Maskery, I., Aboulkhair, N.T., Corfield, M.R., Tuck, C., Clare, A.T., Leach, R.K., Wildman, R.D., Ashcroft, I.A., Hague, R.J.M.: Quantification and characterisation of porosity in selectively laser melted Al–Si10–Mg using X-ray computed tomography. Mater. Charact. 111, 193–204 (2016)10.1016/j.matchar.2015.12.001 ↗
6. Townsend, A., Senin, N., Blunt, L., Leach, R.K.: Taylor Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review. Precis. Eng. 46, 34–47 (2016)10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
7. Seifi, M., Christiansen, D., Beuth, J., Harrysson, O., Lewandowski, J.J.: Process mapping fracture and fatigue behavior of Ti-6al-4v produced by EBM additive manufacturing Ti. In: The 13th World Conference on Titanium Edited by: Adam Pilchak et al. TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) (2015)10.1002/9781119296126.ch232 ↗
8. Thompson, A., Maskery, I., Leach, R.K.: X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27, 072001 (2016)10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001 ↗
9. Kerckhofs, G., Pyka, G., Moesen, M., Van Bael, S., Schrooten, J., Wevers, M.: High-resolution microfocus X-ray computed tomography for 3D surface roughness measurements of additive. Adv. Eng. Mater. 15(3), 153–158 (2013)10.1002/adem.201200156 ↗
10. Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E., Emmelmann, C.: Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater. 117, 371–392 (2016)10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
11. SLM Solutions, 3D Metals: AlSi10Mg. https://slm-solutions.com/download-center . Accessed 1 Aug 2018
12. X-VIEW CT brouchure. https://4nsi.com/brochures/x5000-brochure.pdf . Accessed 1 Aug 2018
13. Ziółkowski, G., Chlebus, E., Szymczyk, P., Kurzac, J.: Application of X-ray Ct method for discontinuity and porosity detection in 316 l stainless steel parts produced with SLM technology. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 14, 608–614 (2014)10.1016/j.acme.2014.02.003 ↗
14. EOS GmbH—Electro Optical Systems Material data sheet. https://www.eos.info/eos_binaries0/eos/8d75e73a9911faca/7a06cf1cc0ad/AlSi10Mg_9011-0024_M290_Material_data_sheet_12-17_en.pdf (2013). Accessed 1 Aug 2018
15. Grasso, M., Colosimo, B.M.: Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 28, 044005 (2017)10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f ↗
16. Warnett, J.M., Titarenko, V., Kiraci, E., Attridge, A., Lionheart, W.R.B., Withers, P.J., Williams, M.A.: Towards in-process X-ray CT for dimensional metrology. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27, 035401 (2016)10.1088/0957-0233/27/3/035401 ↗