The Influence of Texture and Phase Distortion on Ultrasonic Attenuation in Ti-6Al-4V
Source abstract
Abstract
A high resolution experimental capability has been developed to map the phase and magnitude of ultrasonic waves transmitted in a solid. The advancement presented in this paper is provided by laser detection of the ultrasonic energy over a microscopic aperture of approximately 50 μm. The system is built around a computer controlled scanner and a confocal Fabry-Perot interferometer, which uses a diode pumped, frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser as a light source. Wave propagation in the axial and radial directions of a 2.5″ diameter bar of textured Ti-6Al-4V was investigated in this study. Measurements were also taken on samples cut with angles between the surface normals and the axis of the bar of 0, 30, 45, 60, and 90 degrees. The work was motivated by the observation of unusually high apparent attenuation in the axial direction of the as-received bar, thought to be associated with phase distortion rather than actual energy loss. The current phase mapping results, using a focused laser spot, show relatively high wavefront distortion and more nonuniform distribution of the transmitted energy in the axial direction. The contribution to attenuation associated with phase cancellation loss was also investigated. These measurements show the laser detected attenuation to be substantially lower than the piezoelectrically measured attenuation. However, even the relative phase insensitivity of focused laser detection approach clearly indicates the attenuation to be strongest in the axial direction. This paper demonstrates the orientation dependence of attenuation stems from scattering effects associated with texturing and the elongated macroscopic grain structure in the mill annealed Ti-6Al-4V bar generated during processing, which may also affect diffraction and beam divergence.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. J. C. Williams and E. A. Starke, Jr., The role of thermomechanical processing in tailoring the properties of aluminum and titanium alloys, Deformation, Processing, and Structure, G. Krauss, ed. (ASM International, 1984) pp. 306-314.
2. A. Juva and M. Haarvisto, On the effects of microstructure on the attenuation of ultrasonic waves in austenitic stainless steels, The British Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 19(6):293-297 (1977).
3. B. L. Baikie, A. R. Wagg, M. J. Whittle, and D. Yapp, Ultrasonic inspection of austenitic welds, Journal of the British Nuclear Energy Society, 15(3):257-261 (1976).
4. P. D. Panetta, F. J. Margetan, I. Yalda, and R. B. Thompson, Ultrasonic attenuation measurements in jet-engine titanium alloys, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 15B, Thompson and Chimenti, eds., (Plenum Press, NY, 1996) pp. 1525-1532.10.1007/978-1-4613-0383-1_199 ↗
5. P. D. Panetta, F. J. Margetan, I. Yalda, and R. B. Thompson, Observation and interpretation of microstructurally induced fluctuations of back-surface signals and ultrasonic attenuation in titanium alloys, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 16B, Eds., D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, (Plenum Press, NY, 1997) pp. 1547-1554.10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_202 ↗
6. T. Seldis and C. Pecorari, Scattering-induced attenuation of an ultrasonic beam in austenitic steel, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (submitted for publication).
7. M. R. Hollard and J. G. Miller, Phase-insensitive and phase-sensitive quantitative imaging of scattered ultrasound using a two-dimensional pseudo-array, Ultrasonics Symp. Proc. IEEE Cat. No. 88CH2578-3, pp. 815-819 (1988).10.1109/ULTSYM.1988.49491 ↗
8. V. K. Munikoti and A. W. Neumann, Extension of Ahmed and Thompson theory to general elastic plane quasi-wave propagation in textured polycrystalline material, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 17B, Eds., D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, (Plenum Press, NY, 1998) pp. 1657-1664.10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_215 ↗
9. L. J. Busse and J. G. Miller, Response characteristics of a finite aperture, phase insensitive ultrasonic receiver based upon the acoustoelectric effect, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70(5):1370-1376 (1981).10.1121/1.387127 ↗
10. L. J. Busse and J. G. Miller, Detection of spatially nonuniform ultrasonic radiation with phase sensitive (piezoelectric) and phase insensitive (acoustoelectric) receivers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70(5):1377-1386 (1981).10.1121/1.387128 ↗
11. D. Liu and R. C. Waag, Estimation and correction of ultrasonic wavefront distortion using pulse-echo data, Ultrasonics Symp. Proc. IEEE Cat. No. 0-7803-3615-1/96, pp. 1391-1394 (1996).
12. Lwin and W. D. O'Brien, Jr., Tissue-induced ultrasonic wavefront distortion, Ultrasonics Symp. Proc., IEEE Cat. No. 0-7803-3615-1/96, pp. 1415-1418 (1996).10.1109/ULTSYM.1996.584310 ↗
13. J. P. Monchalin, Optical detection of ultrasound, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 33 485-499 (1986).10.1109/T-UFFC.1986.26860 ↗
14. S. Hirsekorn and W. Arnold, High resolution materials characterization by conventional near-field acoustic microscopy, Ultrasonics, 36:491-498, 1998.10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00062-0 ↗
15. B. T. Khuri-Yakub, S. Akamine, B. Hadimoglu, H. Yamada, and C. F. Quate, Near-field acoustic microscopy, Scanning Microscopy Instrumentation (SPIE, Bellingham, 1992) No. 1556, pp. 30-39.10.1117/12.134885 ↗
16. J. P. Monchalin, R. Heon, P. Bouchard, and C. Padioleau, Broadband optical detection of ultrasound by sideband stripping with a confocal Fabry-Perot, Applied Physics Letters, 55(16):1612-1614 (1989).10.1063/1.102235 ↗
17. W. Hassan and P. B. Nagy, Experimental investigation of the grain noise in interferometric detection of ultrasonic waves, Journal of NDE (submitted for publication).
18. M. Hercher, The spherical mirror Fabry-Perot interferometer, Applied Optics, 7(5):951-966 (1968).10.1364/AO.7.000951 ↗
19. ASTM Standard E 494-75, Standard Practice for Measuring Ultrasonic Velocity in Materials, ASTM Committee E-7 on Nondestructive Testing, Subcommittee E07.06 on Ultrasonic Testing Procedures (1985).
20. E. P. Papadakis, The Measurement of Ultrasonic Velocity, Ultrasonic Measurement Methods, Physical Acoustics, Vol. XIX, Thurston and Pierce, eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1990) p. 91.
21. P. C. Waterman and L. J. Teuntonico, Ultrasonic double refraction in single crystals, Journal of Applied Physics, 28(2):266-270 (1957).10.1063/1.1722721 ↗
22. R. Truell, L. J. Teuntonico, and P. W. Levy, Detection of directional neutron damage in silicon by means of ultrasonic double refraction measurements, Physical Review, 105(6):1723-1729 (1957).10.1103/PhysRev.105.1723 ↗
23. K. Goebbels, Structure analysis by scattered ultrasonic radiation, Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing, Sharpe, ed. (Academic, New York, 1980) Vol. IV, pp. 87-157.
24. H. Willems and K. Goebbels, Characterization of microstructure by backscattered ultrasonic waves, Metal Science, 15:549-553 (1981).10.1179/msc.1981.15.11-12.549 ↗
25. C. B. Guo, P. H-ller, and K. Goebbels, Scattering of ultrasonic waves in anisotropic polycrystalline metals, Acoustica, 59(2):112-120 (1985).
26. K. Goebbels, Evaluation of the structure of steels by ultrasonic scattering, Materials Testing, 77(7):231-233 (1975).10.1515/mt-1975-170710 ↗
27. H. W. Koglenik and T. Li, Laser beams and resonators, Applied Optics, 5:1550-1555 (1966).10.1364/AO.5.001550 ↗