A Comprehensive Review of GPR Data Analysis for Bridge Deck Evaluation: From Conventional Methods to Emerging Artificial Intelligence Approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. American Society of Civil Engineers: 2021 Infrastructure Report Card. ASCE (2021)
2. Phares, B.M., Washer, G.A., Rolander, D.D., Graybeal, B.A., Moore, M.: Routine highway Bridge inspection condition Documentation accuracy and reliability. J. Bridge Eng. 9(4), 403–413 (2004)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(403) ↗
3. Gucunski, N., Romero, F., Kruschwitz, S., Feldmann, R., Abu-Hawash, A., Dunn, M.: Multiple complementary nondestructive evaluation technologies for condition assessment of concrete Bridge decks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2201(1), 34–44 (2010)10.3141/2201-05 ↗
4. Dabous, S.A., Yaghi, S., Alkass, S., Moselhi, O.: Concrete Bridge deck condition assessment using IR thermography and ground penetrating radar technologies. Autom. Constr. 81, 340–354 (2017)10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.006 ↗
5. Saarenketo, T., Scullion, T.: Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar. J. Appl. Geophys. 43(2–4), 119–138 (2000)10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00052-X ↗
6. Lai, W.W.L., Derobert, X., Annan, P.: A Review of Ground Penetrating Radar Application in Civil Engineering: A 30-year Journey from Locating and Testing To Imaging and Diagnosis, vol. 96, pp. 58–78. Ndt & E International (2018)10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.002 ↗
7. Roncoroni, G., Forte, E., Santin, I., Pipan, M.: Deep learning-based multifrequency ground penetrating radar data merging. Geophysics. 89(1), F1–F9 (2024)10.1190/geo2023-0215.1 ↗
8. Alani, A.M., Aboutalebi, M., Kilic, G.: Applications of ground penetrating radar (GPR) in Bridge deck monitoring and assessment. J. Appl. Geophys. 97, 45–54 (2013)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.04.009 ↗
9. Plati, C., Loizos, A., Gkyrtis, K.: Assessment of modern roadways using non-destructive geophysical surveying techniques. Surv. Geophys. 41(3), 395–430 (2020)10.1007/s10712-019-09518-y ↗
10. Catapano, I., Gennarelli, G., Ludeno, G., Noviello, C., Esposito, G., Soldovieri, F.: Contactless ground penetrating radar imaging: State of the art, challenges, and microwave tomography-based data processing. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sens. Magazine. 10(1), 251–273 (2021)10.1109/MGRS.2021.3082170 ↗
11. Balayssac, J.P., Garnier, V.: Non-destructive Testing and Evaluation of Civil Engineering Structures, 1st edn. Elsevier, Oxford, UK (2017)
12. Solla, M., Pérez-Gracia, V., Fontul, S.: A review of GPR application on transport infrastructures: Troubleshooting and best practices. Remote Sens. 13(4), 672 (2021)10.3390/rs13040672 ↗
13. Benedetto, A., Pajewski, L.: Civil Engineering Applications of Ground Penetrating Radar. Springer, New York (2015)10.1007/978-3-319-04813-0 ↗
14. Li, M., Faghri, A., Ozden, A., Yue, Y.: Economic feasibility study for pavement monitoring using synthetic aperture radar-based satellite remote sensing: Cost–benefit analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2645(1), 1–11 (2017)10.3141/2645-01 ↗
15. Ferrante, C., Bianchini Ciampoli, L., Benedetto, A., Alani, A.M., Tosti, F.: Non-destructive technologies for sustainable assessment and monitoring of railway infrastructure: A focus on GPR and InSAR methods. Environ. Earth Sci. 80(24), 806 (2021)10.1007/s12665-021-10068-z ↗
16. Zhou, F., Chen, Z., Liu, H., Cui, J., Spencer, B.F., Fang, G.: Simultaneous Estimation of rebar diameter and cover thickness by a GPR-EMI dual sensor. Sensors. 18(9), 2969 (2018)10.3390/s18092969 ↗
17. Cheilakou, E., Theodorakeas, P., Koui, M., Zeris, C.: March). 3D mapping of reinforcement and tendon ducts on pre-stressed concrete bridges by means of ground penetrating radar (GPR). In: Smart Sensor Phenomena, Technology, Networks, and Systems Integration 2014, vol. 9062, pp. 264–273. SPIE (2014)10.1117/12.2046354 ↗
18. Fasasi, M.O.: Enhancing infrastructure resilience with Non-Destructive evaluation: GPR and IE integration for delamination detection. Adv. Eng. Des. Technol., 6(1). (2024)
19. Tešić, K., Baričević, A., Serdar, M.: Non-destructive corrosion inspection of reinforced concrete using ground-penetrating radar: A review. Materials. 14(4), 975 (2021)10.3390/ma14040975 ↗
20. Al-Qadi, I.L., Lahouar, S.: Measuring layer thicknesses with GPR–Theory to practice. Constr. Build. Mater. 19(10), 763–772 (2005)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.005 ↗
21. Hasan, M.I., Yazdani, N.: Ground penetrating radar utilization in exploring inadequate concrete covers in a new Bridge deck. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 1, 104–114 (2014)
22. Benedetto, A., Tosti, F., Ciampoli, L.B., D’amico, F.: An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections. Sig. Process. 132, 201–209 (2017)10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.016 ↗
23. Barnes, C.L., Trottier, J.F., Forgeron, D.: Improved Concrete Bridge Deck Evaluation Using GPR by Accounting for Signal depth–amplitude Effects, vol. 41, pp. 427–433. NDT & E International (2008). 610.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.005 ↗
24. Sbartaï, Z.M., Laurens, S., Balayssac, J.P., Arliguie, G., Ballivy, G.: Ability of the Direct Wave of Radar ground-coupled Antenna for NDT of Concrete Structures, vol. 39, pp. 400–407. NDT & e International (2006). 510.1016/j.ndteint.2005.11.003 ↗
25. Laurens, S., Balayssac, J.P., Rhazi, J., Klysz, G., Arliguie, G.: Non-destructive evaluation of concrete moisture by GPR: Experimental study and direct modeling. Mater. Struct. 38, 827–832 (2005)10.1007/BF02481655 ↗
26. Wu, Y., Shen, F., Yuan, Y., Xu, D.: An improved modified universal ultra-wideband antenna designed for step frequency continuous wave ground penetrating radar system. Sensors. 19(5), 1045 (2019)10.3390/s19051045 ↗
27. Forte, E., Pipan, M.: Review of multi-offset GPR applications: Data acquisition, processing and analysis. Sig. Process. 132, 210–220 (2017)10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.04.011 ↗
28. Zhao, W., Forte, E., Levi, S.T., Pipan, M., Tian, G.: Improved high-resolution GPR imaging and characterization of prehistoric archaeological features by means of attribute analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 54, 77–85 (2015)10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.033 ↗
29. Tong, Z., Gao, J., Yuan, D.: Advances of deep learning applications in ground-penetrating radar: A survey. Constr. Build. Mater. 258, 120371 (2020)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120371 ↗
30. Sui, X., Leng, Z., Wang, S.: Machine learning-based detection of transportation infrastructure internal defects using ground-penetrating radar: A state-of-the-art review. Intell. Transp. Infrastructure. 2, liad004 (2023)
31. Tosti, F., Gagliardi, V., D’Amico, F., Alani, A.M.: Transport infrastructure monitoring by data fusion of GPR and SAR imagery information. Transp. Res. Procedia. 45, 771–778 (2020)10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.097 ↗
32. Shi, X., Zhang, A., Han, G., Yin, Y., Chen, W.: The Design of 3D Ground Penetrating Radar System for Bridge Inspection. IEEE Sensors Journal (2024)10.1109/JSEN.2024.3396467 ↗
33. Kim, J., Gucunski, N., Dinh, K., Duong, T.H.: Advanced integration and 3-D visualization of data from multiple nondestructive evaluation technologies. In Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress 2016 (pp. 57–66). (2016)10.1061/9780784479742.006 ↗
34. Hou, F., Rui, X., Fan, X., Zhang, H.: Review of GPR activities in civil infrastructures: Data analysis and applications. Remote Sens. 14(23), 5972 (2022)10.3390/rs14235972 ↗
35. Goulias, D.G., Cafiso, S., Di Graziano, A., Saremi, S.G., Currao, V.: Condition assessment of Bridge decks through ground-penetrating radar in Bridge management systems. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34(5), 04020100 (2020)10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001507 ↗
36. Abdul Rahman, M., Alsharqawi, M., Zayed, T.: A review on defects detection in RC bridge decks with a model developed for automated corrosion detection using GPR. In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Short and Medium Span Bridges (No. 194). (2018)
37. Coleman, Z.W., Schindler, A.K.: Investigation of ground-penetrating radar defect detection capabilities, influence of moisture content, and optimal data collection orientation in condition assessments of concrete Bridge decks. J. Appl. Geophys. 202, 104655 (2022)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104655 ↗
38. Goulias, D.: MD-20-SHA/UM/4–54). In: Maryland. State Highway Administration. Office of Policy & Research (2020). Optimizing Field Data Collection & Developing Advanced GPR Processing Modules (No
39. Hampshire, D.P.: A derivation of maxwell’s equations using the heaviside notation. Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 376(2134), 20170447 (2018)10.1098/rsta.2017.0447 ↗
40. Morency, C.: Electromagnetic wave propagation based upon spectral-element methodology in dispersive and attenuating media. Geophys. J. Int. 220(2), 951–966 (2020)10.1093/gji/ggz510 ↗
41. Rhee, J.Y., Park, K.E., Lee, K.H., Kee, S.H.: A practical approach to condition assessment of asphalt-covered concrete Bridge decks on Korean expressways by dielectric constant measurements using air-coupled GPR. Sensors. 20(9), 2497 (2020)10.3390/s20092497 ↗
42. Hu, D., Li, S., Ma, Z.J., Huang, B.: Concrete Bridge Deck Deterioration Assessment Using Ground Penetrating Radar (No. RES 2019-17). University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Department of Civil and Environmetal Engineering (2021)
43. Zatar, W., Nguyen, T.T., Nguyen, H.: Environmental effects on condition assessments of concrete structures with ground penetrating radar. J. Appl. Geophys. 203, 104713 (2022)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104713 ↗
44. David, D.S.K., Jeong, Y., Wu, Y.C., Ham, S.: An analytical antenna modeling of electromagnetic wave propagation in inhomogeneous media using FDTD: A comprehensive study. Sensors. 23(8), 3896 (2023)10.3390/s23083896 ↗
45. Taylor, J.M., Morris, I.M.: Investigating concrete properties using dielectric constant from ground penetrating radar scans. Infrastructures. 7(12), 173 (2022)10.3390/infrastructures7120173 ↗
46. Ahmad, N.S., Hamid, R.: Relationship between moisture content and dielectric values of concrete using ground penetrating radar method. J. Adv. Res. Des. 57(1), 21–33 (2019)
47. Kim, J., You, Y.J.: Evaluating the chloride absorption of unsaturated Cover-Concrete using electrical measurements. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 26(3), 1354–1364 (2022)10.1007/s12205-021-5138-8 ↗
48. Pozar, D.M.: Microwave Engineering: Theory and Techniques. Wiley (2021)
49. Wang, H.H., Xi, Y.H., Lv, Y.Z., Wang, Y.C.: Attenuation-compensated reverse time migration of GPR data constrained by resistivity. Appl. Geophys. 19(4), 563–571 (2022)10.1007/s11770-022-0958-y ↗
50. Jeong, J.H., Kim, H.H., Lee, J.G., Baek, Y.K.: Epsilon iron oxide (ε-Fe2O3) as an electromagnetic functional material: Properties, Synthesis, and applications. J. Powder Mater. 31(6), 465–479 (2024)10.4150/jpm.2024.00290 ↗
51. Bachiri, T., Khamlichi, A., Hamdaoui, M., Bezzazi, M., Faize, A.: Numerical Modelling of Bridge Deck Reinforcement Corrosion Based on Analysis of GPR Data. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering (2024)10.1556/1848.2023.00740 ↗
52. Sun, H., Pashoutani, S., Zhu, J.: Nondestructive evaluation of concrete bridge decks with automated acoustic scanning system and ground penetrating radar. Sensors, 18(6), 1955. (2018)10.3390/s18061955 ↗
53. Zhan, L., Qi, S., Hu, B., Wu, Y., Chen, C.: Reflection coefficient between complex impedances. In 2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronics Technology (ICET) (pp. 127–131). IEEE. (2020), May10.1109/ICET49382.2020.9119648 ↗
54. Moore, M., Rezaizadeh, A., Scott, M., Wiss, J.: Phenomenology Study of HERMES ground-penetrating Radar Technology for Detection and Identification of Common Bridge Deck Features (No. FHWA-RD-01-090). Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center (2001)
55. Meterfi, Y., Trouzine, H., Houmadi, Y.: Multiphysical Coupling Analysis of the Transition Zone Behaviour in Corroded Reinforced Concrete Structures. In International Conference on Trends on Construction in the Post-Digital Era (pp. 311–326). Cham: Springer International Publishing. (2022), September10.1007/978-3-031-20241-4_21 ↗
56. Sun, H.H., Lee, Y.H., Luo, W., Ow, L.F., Yusof, M.L.M., Yucel, A.C.: Dual-cross-polarized GPR measurement method for detection and orientation Estimation of shallowly buried elongated object. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–12 (2021)
57. Zhang, X., Pei, J., Sha, X., Feng, X., Hu, X., Chen, C., Song, Z.: Experimental Co-Polarimetric GPR Survey on Artificial Vertical Concrete Cracks by the Improved Time-Varying Centroid Frequency Scheme. Remote Sensing, 16(12), 2095. (2024)10.3390/rs16122095 ↗
58. Liu, H., Lu, H., Lin, J., Han, F., Liu, C., Cui, J., Spencer, B.F.: Penetration properties of ground penetrating radar waves through rebar grids. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 18(7), 1199–1203 (2020)10.1109/LGRS.2020.2995670 ↗
59. Omar, A., Moselhi, O.: Condition Monitoring of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks: Current Practices and Future Perspectives, vol. 8. Current Trends in Civil & Structural Engineering-CTCSE (2022). 410.33552/CTCSE.2022.08.000695 ↗
60. Cham, R.Y.K., Lai, W.W.L.: An experimental study of GPR Near-Field problem in depth ranging of buried objects. Adv. Civil Eng. 20231, 6865847 (2023)
61. Tokmaktsi, E., Diamanti, N., Vargemezis, G., Giannopoulos, A., Annan, A.P.: Studying gpr’s direct and reflected waves. Near Surf. Geophys. 22(Special Issue: Ground Penetrating Radar GPR Numerical Modelling Research and Practice), 161–174 (2024)10.1002/nsg.12292 ↗
62. Lai, W.L., Kind, T., Wiggenhauser, H.: Frequency-dependent Dispersion of high-frequency Ground Penetrating Radar Wave in Concrete, vol. 44, pp. 267–273. NDT & E International (2011). 310.1016/j.ndteint.2010.12.004 ↗
63. Kandul, S., Ladkat, M., Chitnis, R., Sane, R., Varpe, D.T.: Developing Scans from Ground Penetrating Radar Data for Detecting Underground Target: A, B and C Scan. In Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Computations in Engineering Systems: Proceedings of ICAIECES 2017 (pp. 305–313). Springer Singapore. (2018)10.1007/978-981-10-7868-2_30 ↗
64. Mechbal, Z., Khamlichi, A.: Determination of Concrete Rebars Characteristics by Enhanced post-processing of GPR Scan Raw Data, vol. 89, pp. 30–39. Ndt & E International (2017)10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.03.005 ↗
65. He, W., Lai, W.W.L., Sui, X., Giannopoulos, A.: Delamination characterization in thin asphalt pavement structure using dispersive GPR data. Constr. Build. Mater. 402, 132834 (2023)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132834 ↗
66. Morris, I.M., Kumar, V., Glisic, B.: Predicting material properties of concrete from ground-penetrating radar attributes. Struct. Health Monit. 20(5), 2791–2812 (2021)10.1177/1475921720976999 ↗
67. Raju, R.K., Hasan, M.I., Yazdani, N.: Quantitative relationship involving reinforcing bar corrosion and ground-penetrating radar amplitude. ACI Mater. J. 115(3), 449–457 (2018)
68. Al-Qadi, I.L., Lahouar, S.: Use of GPR for thickness measurement and quality control of flexible pavements. J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 73(501), 28 (2004)
69. Kaplanvural, I., Özkap, K., Pekşen, E.: Influence of water content investigation on GPR wave Attenuation for early age concrete in natural air-drying condition. Constr. Build. Mater. 297, 123783 (2021)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123783 ↗
70. Che, C.K.N.A.H., Melor, K., Joret, A., Razali, M., Ponniran, A., Sulong, M.S., Omar, R.: Frequency based signal processing technique for pulse modulation ground penetrating radar system. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 11(5), 4104 (2021)
71. Sun, H.H., Cheng, W., Fan, Z.: Learning to remove clutter in real-world GPR images using hybrid data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–14 (2022)
72. Wiwatrojanagul, P., Sahamitmongkol, R., Tangtermsirikul, S., Khamsemanan, N.: A new method to determine locations of rebars and estimate cover thickness of RC structures using GPR data. Constr. Build. Mater. 140, 257–273 (2017)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.126 ↗
73. Barnes, C.L., Trottier, J.F.: Ground-penetrating radar for network-level concrete deck repair management. J. Transp. Eng. 126(3), 257–262 (2000)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:3(257) ↗
74. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N.: Factors affecting the detectability of concrete delamination in GPR images. Constr. Build. Mater. 274, 121837 (2021)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121837 ↗
75. Utsi, E.: Bringing up the Bodies: High Resolution and Target Definition Using GPR. In PIERS Proceedings. (2013), August
76. Huang, C., Su, Y.: A new GPR calibration method for high accuracy thickness and permittivity measurement of multi-layered pavement. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004. (pp. 627–630). IEEE. (2004), June
77. Steinbeck, L., Mester, A., Zimmermann, E., Klotzsche, A., van Waasen, S.: In situ time-zero correction for a ground penetrating radar monitoring system with 3000 antennas. Meas. Sci. Technol. 33(7), 075904 (2022)10.1088/1361-6501/ac632b ↗
78. Bai, X., Luo, X., Guo, S., Wang, L., Chen, H., Mi, H., … Gao, Y. (2020, November).A novel gain control method based on extremum envelope for high speed array GPR. In 2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall) (pp. 1–5). IEEE10.1109/VTC2020-Fall49728.2020.9348631 ↗
79. Khan, U.S., Al-Nuaimy, W.: Background removal from GPR data using eigenvalues. In Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (pp. 1–5). IEEE. (2010), June10.1109/ICGPR.2010.5550079 ↗
80. Baili, J., Lahouar, S., Hergli, M., Al-Qadi, I.L., Besbes, K.: GPR signal de-noising by discrete wavelet transform. Ndt E Int. 42(8), 696–703 (2009)10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.06.003 ↗
81. Smitha, N., Bharadwaj, U., Abilash, D.R., Sridhara, S., S. N., Singh, V.: Kirchhoff and FK migration to focus ground penetrating radar images. Int. J. Geo-Engineering. 7(1), 4 (2016)10.1186/s40703-016-0019-6 ↗
82. Schmelzbach, C., Huber, E.: Efficient Deconvolution of ground-penetrating radar data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53(9), 5209–5217 (2015)10.1109/TGRS.2015.2419235 ↗
83. Pudova, N., Shirobokov, M., Kuvaldin, A.: Application of the attribute analysis for interpretation of GPR survey data. In 2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. (2018), June10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441609 ↗
84. Lei, W., Hou, F., Xi, J., Tan, Q., Xu, M., Jiang, X., Gu, Q.: Automatic hyperbola detection and fitting in GPR B-scan image. Autom. Constr. 106, 102839 (2019)10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102839 ↗
85. Cui, F., Ning, M., Shen, J., Shu, X.: Automatic recognition and tracking of highway layer-interface using faster R-CNN. J. Appl. Geophys. 196, 104477 (2022)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104477 ↗
86. Martino, N., Maser, K., Birken, R., Wang, M.: Determining ground penetrating radar amplitude thresholds for the corrosion state of reinforced concrete Bridge decks. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 19(3), 175–181 (2014)10.2113/JEEG19.3.175 ↗
87. Asadi, P., Gindy, M., Alvarez, M., Asadi, A.: A computer vision based rebar detection chain for automatic processing of concrete Bridge deck GPR data. Autom. Constr. 112, 103106 (2020)10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103106 ↗
88. Xiang, Z., Rashidi, A., Ou, G.: An improved convolutional neural network system for automatically detecting rebar in GPR data. In ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering 2019 (pp. 422–429). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. (2019), June10.1061/9780784482438.054 ↗
89. Ahmed, M., Moselhi, O., Bhowmick, A.: Two-tier data fusion method for Bridge condition assessment. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 45(3), 197–214 (2018)10.1139/cjce-2017-0160 ↗
90. Feng, X., Yu, Y., Liu, C., Fehler, M.: Combination of H-alpha decomposition and migration for enhancing subsurface target classification of GPR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53(9), 4852–4861 (2015)10.1109/TGRS.2015.2411572 ↗
91. Bornik, A., Neubauer, W.: 3D visualization techniques for analysis and archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Remote Sens. 14(7), 1709 (2022)10.3390/rs14071709 ↗
92. Francke, J., Martínez, L.: Cloud computing for automated 3D GPR processing and interpretation. In 18th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (pp. 236–238). Society of Exploration Geophysicists. (2020), November10.1190/gpr2020-063.1 ↗
93. Benedetto, A., Manacorda, G., Simi, A., Tosti, F.: Novel perspectives in bridges inspection using GPR. Nondestructive Test. Evaluation. 27(3), 239–251 (2012)10.1080/10589759.2012.694883 ↗
94. Benedetto, A.: A three-dimensional approach for tracking cracks in bridges using GPR. J. Appl. Geophys. 97, 37–44 (2013)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.12.010 ↗
95. Dinh, K., Zayed, T.: Correlation-based model for evaluating Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data of concrete bridge decks. In ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (Vol. 30, p. 1). IAARC Publications. (2013)10.22260/ISARC2013/0005 ↗
96. Dinh, K., Zayed, T., Romero, F., Tarussov, A.: Method for analyzing time-series GPR data of concrete Bridge decks. J. Bridge Eng. 20(6), 04014086 (2015)10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000679 ↗
97. Varnavina, A.V., Khamzin, A.K., Sneed, L.H., Torgashov, E.V., Anderson, N.L., Maerz, N.H., Boyko, K.J.: Concrete Bridge deck assessment: Relationship between GPR data and concrete removal depth measurements collected after hydrodemolition. Constr. Build. Mater. 99, 26–38 (2015)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.008 ↗
98. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Kim, J., Duong, T.H.: Understanding depth-amplitude Effects in Assessment of GPR Data from Concrete Bridge Decks, vol. 83, pp. 48–58. NDT & E International (2016)10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.004 ↗
99. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Kim, J., Duong, T.H.: Method for Attenuation assessment of GPR data from concrete Bridge decks. Ndt E Int. 92, 50–58 (2017)10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.016 ↗
100. Ata, M., Abouhamad, M., Serror, H., Marzouk, M., Abdelakder, E.: On the Use of Ground Penetrating Radar for Bridge Deck Assessment. DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering (2018)10.12783/dtcse/csae2017/17510 ↗