journal article·2025-09Open access

From Uncertainty to Calibration: Online Pose Estimation of an Industrial Twin Robotic Computed Tomography System with Unknown Spheres

Niklas Handke, Yiqun Q. Ma, Anton Weiss, Simon Wittl, Rebecca Wagner, Gabriel Herl

Abstract

Abstract Robotic CT systems offer several advantages over conventional systems due to their high flexibility. They can perform almost any CT trajectory and are particularly well suited for region-of-interest (ROI) scans of objects that exceed the size limitations of conventional CT systems. However, robot-based manipulators have a significantly lower absolute positioning accuracy compared to conventional manipulators, necessitating additional calibration methods to refine the geometric information about the spatial position and orientation of the X-ray source and detector for each projection for higher resolution reconstructions. We propose a geometric calibration method for CT systems with twelve degrees of freedom that does not require additional calibration scans. The method is easy to use, computationally efficient, and supports continuous CT trajectories. It utilises spheres with unknown positions that are attached to the specimen. The calibration process is divided into two stages. First, the spatial positions of the spheres are estimated using the initial geometric information and the acquired projections. Second, these estimates serve as input to an iterative optimisation that calibrates each projection individually. The applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated through simulations and real-world scans using a twin robotic CT system. Both quantitative and qualitative evaluations show a significant improvement in scan quality, comparable to results obtained via offline calibration. Moreover, evaluations on simulated data confirm the method’s robustness even for systems with positioning errors in the millimetre range. This novel online calibration technique is computationally efficient, compatible with highly flexible CT systems, and holds promise for enabling future mobile CT applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Dental Radiography and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Weiss, A., Wittl, S., Herl, G., Zabler, S.: Simulated and experimental evaluation of the accuracy of twin robotic ct systems. In: 12th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography (iCT) 2023, vol. 28. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing, Fürth, Germany (2023). https://doi.org/10.58286/2775310.58286/27753 ↗
2. Li, X., Da, Z., Liu, B.: A generic geometric calibration method for tomographic imaging systems with flat-panel detectors-a detailed implementation guide. Med. Phys. 37(7), 3844–3854 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.343199610.1118/1.3431996 ↗
3. Aichert, A., Bier, B., Rist, L., Maier, A.K.: Projective invariants for geometric calibration in flat-panel computed tomography. In: Proc CT-Meeting, pp. 69–72 (2018). https://www5.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Forschung/Publikationen/2018/Aichert18-PIF.pdf
4. Cho, Y., Moseley, D.J., Siewerdsen, J.H., Jaffray, D.A.: Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems. Med. Phys. 32(4), 968–983 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.186965210.1118/1.1869652 ↗
5. Blumensath, T., O’Brien, N., Wood, C.E.: Calibration of robotic manipulator systems for cone-beam tomography imaging. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65(7), 1384–1393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2018.284380710.1109/TNS.2018.2843807 ↗
6. Li, G., Chen, X., You, C., Huang, X., Deng, Z., Luo, S.: A nonconvex model-based combined geometric calibration scheme for micro cone-beam ct with irregular trajectories. Med. Phys. 50(5), 2759–2774 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.1625710.1002/mp.16257 ↗
7. Li, G., Huang, X., Chen, X., Wang, H., Zhou, L., Ji, X., Chen, Y., Luo, S.: A self-contained calibration scheme for micro-ct with irregular trajectories based on phantom auto-measurement. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 74, 1–13 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2025.352752410.1109/TIM.2025.3527524 ↗
8. Butzhammer, L., Hausotte, T.: Complex 3d scan trajectories for industrial cone-beam computed tomography using a hexapod. Meas. Sci. Technol. 32(10), 105402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac08c410.1088/1361-6501/ac08c4 ↗
9. Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051181168510.1017/CBO9780511811685 ↗
10. Pekel, E., Schaff, F., Dierolf, M., Pfeiffer, F., Lasser, T.: X-ray computed tomography with seven degree of freedom robotic sample holder. Eng. Res. Express 4(3), 035022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ac822410.1088/2631-8695/ac8224 ↗
11. Klein, P., Herold, F.: Methode zur automatischen bestimmung der projektionsgeometrie. In: DGZfP Jahrestagung 2017, Koblenz, Germany, pp. 22–24 (2017). https://www.ndt.net/?id=2148
12. Ouadah, S., Stayman, J.W., Gang, G., Uneri, A., Ehtiati, T., Siewerdsen, J.H.: Self-calibration of cone-beam ct geometry using 3d-2d image registration: Development and application to task-based imaging with a robotic c-arm. Proceedings of SPIE–the International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 9415 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.208253810.1117/12.2082538 ↗
13. Chung, K., Schad, L.R., Zöllner, F.G.: Tomosynthesis implementation with adaptive online calibration on clinical c-arm systemsInt. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 13(10), 1481–1495 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1782-y10.1007/s11548-018-1782-y ↗
14. Ji, X., Lu, Y., Zhuo, X., Zhang, Y., Zhu, S., Chen, Y.: A geometrical calibration method for c-arm ct based on a nonlinear registration model. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 1–13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.330718210.1109/TIM.2023.3307182 ↗
15. Tönnes, C., Russ, T., Schad, L.R., Zöllner, F.G.: Feature-based cbct self-calibration for arbitrary trajectories. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 17(11), 2151–2159 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02645-910.1007/s11548-022-02645-9 ↗
16. Bussy, V., Vienne, C.: Robust 3d/2d hybrid registration for integrating a priori cad model into x-ray computed tomography. In: ORASIS 2021, Saint Ferréol, France (2021). Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique [CNRS]. https://hal.science/hal-03339762
17. Maass, N., Dennerlein, F., Aichert, A., Maier, A.: Geometrical jitter correction in computed tomography. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Image Formation in X-ray Computed Tomography, pp. 338–342 (2014)
18. Cant, J., Behiels, G., Sijbers, J.: Automatic geometric calibration of chest tomosynthesis using data consistency conditions. In: The 4th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography, pp. 1–4. UAntwerpen, Vision Lab, Faculty of Sciences, Physics Department, Bamberg, Germany (2016). https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1435310151162165141
19. Aichert, A., Berger, M., Wang, J., Maass, N., Doerfler, A., Hornegger, J., Maier, A.K.: Epipolar consistency in transmission imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34(11), 2205–2219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2015.242641710.1109/TMI.2015.2426417 ↗
20. Frysch, R., Rose, G.: Rigid motion compensation in interventional c-arm ct using consistency measure on projection data 9349, 298–306 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_3710.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_37 ↗
21. Li, M., Bohacova, J., Uher, J., Cong, W., Rubinstein, J., Wang, G.: Motion correction for robot-based x-ray photon-counting ct at ultrahigh resolution, p. 33 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1117/12.263526310.1117/12.2635263 ↗
22. Li, M., Zan, G., Yun, W., Uher, J., Wen, J., Wang, G.: Data-driven imaging geometric recovery of ultrahigh resolution robotic micro-ct for in-vivo and other applications (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18063
23. Rückert, D., Wang, Y., Li, R., Idoughi, R., Heidrich, W.: NeAT: Neural Adaptive Tomography. arXiv:2202.02171v110.1145/3528223.3530121 ↗
24. Rückert, D., Butzhammer, L., Wittl, S., Herl, G., Hausotte, T., Kurth, P.: Uncalibrated ct reconstruction for one-shot scanning of arbitrary trajectories. e-J. Nondestruct. Test. 29(3) (2024). https://doi.org/10.58286/2923110.58286/29231 ↗
25. Bossema, F.G., Palenstijn, W.J., Heginbotham, A., Corona, M., van Leeuwen, T., van Liere, R., Dorscheid, J., O’Flynn, D., Dyer, J., Hermens, E., Batenburg, K.J. (eds.): Enabling 3D CT-scanning of Cultural Heritage Objects Using Only In-house 2D X-ray Equipment in Museums, vol. 15 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48102-w10.1038/s41467-024-48102-w ↗
26. Ma, Y.Q., Reynolds, T., Ehtiati, T., Weiss, C., Hong, K., Theodore, N., Gang, G.J., Stayman, J.W.: Fully automatic online geometric calibration for non-circular cone-beam ct orbits using fiducials with unknown placement. Med. Phys. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.1704110.1002/mp.17041 ↗
27. Blondel, M., Berthet, Q., Cuturi, M., Frostig, R., Hoyer, S., Llinares-López, F., Pedregosa, F., Vert, J.-P.: Efficient and modular implicit differentiation. arXiv:2105.15183 (2021)
28. Bradski, G.: The Opencv Library. Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools (2000)
29. Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., Johnson, M.J., Leary, C., Maclaurin, D., Necula, G., Paszke, A., VanderPlas, J., Wanderman-Milne, S., Zhang, Q.: JAX: Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018). http://github.com/google/jax
30. Bellon, C.: aRTist–Analytical RT Inspection Simulation Tool. Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM). https://artist.bam.de/
31. Andersen, A.: Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (sart): A superior implementation of the art algorithm. Ultrason. Imaging 6(1), 81–94 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-7346(84)90008-710.1016/0161-7346(84)90008-7 ↗
32. Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C., Kress, J.W.: Practical cone-beam algorithm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A-opt. Image Sci. Vision 1, 612–619 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.1.00061210.1364/JOSAA.1.000612 ↗
33. Butzhammer, L., Handke, N., Wittl, S., Herl, G., Hausotte, T.: Direct assessment of the influence of pose repeatability on the accuracy of dimensional measurements for computed tomography systems with high degrees of freedom. Meas. Sci. Technol. 36(2), 025401 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ada05a10.1088/1361-6501/ada05a ↗