A Hybrid Hidden Markov Model and Time-Frequency Approach to Impact Echo Signal Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Music and Audio Processing · Time Series Analysis and Forecasting · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Dunker, K.F., Rabbat, B.G.: Performance of highway bridges. Concr. Int. 12(8), 40–42 (1990)
2. Shokouhi, P.: Comprehensive Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Decks Using Impact Echo. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick, New Jersey (2006)
3. Hoegh, K., Khazanovich, L., Dai, S., Yu, T.: Evaluating asphalt concrete air void variation via GPR antenna array data. Case Stud. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 3, 27–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csndt.2015.03.00210.1016/j.csndt.2015.03.002 ↗
4. Huston, D., Cui, J., Burns, D., Hurley, D.: Concrete bridge deck condition assessment with automated multisensor techniques. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7(7–8), 613–623 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.50154210.1080/15732479.2010.501542 ↗
5. McDaniel, M., Celaya, M., Nazarian, S.: Concrete bridge deck quality mapping with seismic methods: case study in Texas. Transp. Res. Rec. 2202(1), 53–60 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3141/2202-0710.3141/2202-07 ↗
6. Scott, M., Rezaizadeh, A., Delahaza, A., Santos, C.G., Moore, M., Graybeal, B., Washer, G.: A comparison of nondestructive evaluation methods for bridge deck assessment. NDT & E Int. 36(4), 245–255 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00061-0. Structural Faults and Repair10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00061-0 ↗
7. Sultan, A.A., Washer, G.A.: Comparison of two nondestructive evaluation technologies for the condition assessment of bridge decks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2672(41), 113–122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/036119811879083510.1177/0361198118790835 ↗
8. Oh, T., Kee, S.-H., Arndt, R.W., Popovics, J.S., Zhu, J.: Comparison of NDT methods for assessment of a concrete bridge deck. J. Eng. Mech. 139(3), 305–314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000044110.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000441 ↗
9. Pospisil, K., Manychova, M., Stryk, J., Korenska, M., Matula, R., Svoboda, V.: Diagnostics of reinforcement conditions in concrete structures by GPR, impact-echo method and metal magnetic memory method. Remote Sensing (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1305095210.3390/rs13050952 ↗
10. Layssi, H., Ghods, P., Alizadeh, A.R., Salehi, M.: Electrical resistivity of concrete. Concr. Int. 37(5), 41–46 (2015)
11. Azarsa, P., Gupta, R.: Electrical resistivity of concrete for durability evaluation: a review. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017(1), 1–30 (2017)10.1155/2017/8453095 ↗
12. Maierhofer, C.: Nondestructive evaluation of concrete infrastructure with ground penetrating radar. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 15(3), 287–297 (2003)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(287) ↗
13. Carino, N.J., Sansalone, M., Hsu, N.N.: Flaw detection in concrete by frequency spectrum analysis of impact-echo waveforms. In: International Advances in Nondestructive Testing, New York (1986)10.6028/NBS.IR.86-3452 ↗
14. Carino, N.J., Sansalone, M.: Impact-echo: a new method for inspecting construction materials. In: Conference on NDT &E Manufacturing Construction, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, pp. 209–223 (1988)
15. Sansalone, M., Carino, N.J.: Detecting delaminations in concrete slabs with and without overlays using the impact-echo method. ACI Mater. J. 86(2), 175–184 (1989)
16. Sansalone, M., Streett, W.B.: Impact-Echo: Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete and Masonry. Bullbrier Press, Ithaca (1997)
17. Celaya, M., Shokouhi, P., Nazarian, S.: Assessment of debonding in concrete slabs using seismic methods. Transp. Res. Rec. 2016(1), 65–75 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/2016-0810.3141/2016-08 ↗
18. Xiao, J.Z., Agrawal, A.: Final report—robotic inspection of bridges using impact-echo technology. Technical report, New York (February 2012). http://www.utrc2.org/sites/default/files/pubs/Final-Robotic-Inspection-Bridges.pdf
19. Chaudhary, M.T.A.: Effectiveness of impact echo testing in detecting flaws in prestressed concrete slabs. Constr. Build. Mater. 47, 753–759 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.021 ↗
20. Song, K.-I., Cho, G.-C.: Bonding state evaluation of tunnel shotcrete applied onto hard rocks using the impact-echo method. NDT & E Int. 42(6), 487–500 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.02.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2009.02.007 ↗
21. Yao Fei, C., Yimin, Guangyu, C.: Wavelet packet analysis of shotcrete-rock structures using the impact-echo method. Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test. 57, 43–54 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092101006X10.1134/S106183092101006X ↗
22. Legendre, S., Goyette, J., Massicotte, D.: Ultrasonic NDE of composite material structures using wavelet coefficients. NDT & E Int. 34(1), 31–37 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00029-310.1016/S0963-8695(00)00029-3 ↗
23. Kim, D.S., Kim, N.R., Seo, W.S.: Time-Frequency Analysis for Impact Echo-SASW (IE-SASW) Method. In: Key Engineering Materials, vol. 270, pp. 1529–1534. Trans Tech Publ, Cham (2004)10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.270-273.1529 ↗
24. Yu, C.-P., Lin, Y., Chang, C.-C.: An effective crack-identification approach for impact echo signals using MWT spectrograms and scaled FFT spectra. Mater. Struct. 54(1), 1–21 (2021)10.1617/s11527-020-01597-3 ↗
25. Luk, B.L., Liu, K., Jiang, Z., Tong, F.: Robotic impact-acoustics system for tile-wall bonding integrity inspection. Mechatronics 19(8), 1251–1260 (2009)10.1016/j.mechatronics.2009.07.006 ↗
26. Li, B., Cao, J., Xiao, J., Zhang, X., Wang, H.: Robotic impact-echo non-destructive evaluation based on fft and svm. In: Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 2854–2859. IEEE, Piscataway (2014)10.1109/WCICA.2014.7053181 ↗
27. Pratt, D.: The use of a neural network for automating impact-echo signal analysis. Mater. J. Am. Concr. Inst. 89, 178–187 (1992)
28. Sadowski, L.: Non-destructive identification of pull-off adhesion between concrete layers. Autom. Constr. 57, 146–155 (2015)10.1016/j.autcon.2015.06.004 ↗
29. Zhang, J.-K., Yan, W., Cui, D.-M.: Concrete condition assessment using impact-echo method and extreme learning machines. Sensors 16(4), 447 (2016)10.3390/s16040447 ↗
30. Dorafshan, S., Azari, H.: Evaluation of bridge decks with overlays using impact echo, a deep learning approach. Autom. Constr. 113, 103133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10313310.1016/j.autcon.2020.103133 ↗
31. Dorafshan, S., Azari, H.: Deep learning models for bridge deck evaluation using impact echo. Constr. Build. Mater. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12010910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120109 ↗
32. Ye, J., Iwata, M., Takumi, K., Murakawa, M., Tetsuya, H., Kubota, Y., Yui, T., Mori, K.: Statistical impact-echo analysis based on Grassmann manifold learning: Its preliminary results for concrete condition assessment. In: EWSHM-7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (2014)
33. Shen, Z., Liu, J., He, Y., Zhang, X., Xu, R., Yu, H., Cui, P.: Towards out-of-distribution generalization: A survey. arXiv preprint (2021). arXiv:2108.13624
34. Krueger, D., Caballero, E., Jacobsen, J.-H., Zhang, A., Binas, J., Zhang, D., Le Priol, R., Courville, A.: Out-of-distribution generalization via risk extrapolation (REX). In: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, pp. 5815–5826 (2021)
35. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19(6), 716–723 (1974)10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 ↗
36. Maeda, N.: A method for reading and checking phase times in autoprocessing system of seismic wave data. Zisin 38, 365–379 (1985)10.4294/zisin1948.38.3_365 ↗
37. Zhang, H., Thurber, C., Rowe, C.: Automatic p-wave arrival detection and picking with multiscale wavelet analysis for single-component recordings. Bull. Seismol. Soc. .Am. 93(5), 1904–1912 (2003)10.1785/0120020241 ↗
38. Abraham, O., Leonard, C., Cote, P., Piwakowski, B.: Time frequency analysis of impact-echo signals: numerical modeling and experimental validation. Mater. J. 97(6), 645–657 (2000)
39. Bouden, T., Djerfi, F., Dib, S., Nibouche, M.: Hilbert Huang transform for enhancing the impact-echo method of nondestructive testing. J. Autom. Syst. Eng 6(4), 172–184 (2012)
40. F.R.S. Karl Pearson: LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 2(11), 559–572 (1901). https://doi.org/10.1080/1478644010946272010.1080/14786440109462720 ↗
41. Hotelling, H.: Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 498–520 (1933)10.1037/h0070888 ↗
42. Jiang, Y., Saito, M., Sinha, K.C.: Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain. Transp. Res. Rec. 1180, 25–32 (1988)
43. Thompson, P.D., Johnson, M.B.: Markovian bridge deterioration: developing models from historical data. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 1(1), 85–91 (2005)10.1080/15732470412331289332 ↗
44. Rabiner, L.R.: A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77(2), 257–286 (1989)10.1109/5.18626 ↗
45. Rabiner, L.: Fundamentals of Speech Recognition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1993)
46. Mondal, S., Ghalyan, N.F., Ray, A., Mukhopadhyay, A.: Early detection of thermoacoustic instabilities using hidden Markov models. Combust. Sci. Technol. 191(8), 1309–1336 (2018)10.1080/00102202.2018.1523900 ↗
47. Dorj, E., Chen, C., Pecht, M.: A Bayesian hidden Markov model-based approach for anomaly detection in electronic systems. In: 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–10. IEEE, Piscataway (2013)10.1109/AERO.2013.6497204 ↗
48. Hajek, B.: Random Processes for Engineers, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)10.1017/CBO9781316164600 ↗
49. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.N.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory. COLT’92, pp. 144–152. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/130385.13040110.1145/130385.130401 ↗
50. Vapnik, V., Golowich, S.E., Smola, A.: Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation and signal processing. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS’96, pp. 281–287. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
51. Aggarwal, C.C., Hinneburg, A., Keim, D.A.: On the surprising behavior of distance metrics in high dimensional space. In: Van den Bussche, J., Vianu, V. (eds.) Database Theory—ICDT 2001, pp. 420–434. Springer, Berlin (2001)10.1007/3-540-44503-X_27 ↗