journal article·2022-03Open access

A Methodology for Reconstructing Source Properties of a Conical Piezoelectric Actuator Using Array-Based Methods

P. A. Selvadurai, R. Wu, P. Bianchi, Z. Niu, S. Michail, C. Madonna, S. Wiemer

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the force produced by a conical piezoelectric (PZT, lead zirconate titanate) transducer actuated by high voltage pulses (HVP) in contact with a steel transfer plate. Using elastic wave propagation theory in a semi-infinite plate, we aimed to quantify the magnitude and estimate the shape of the force–time function via the body waves produced in the transfer plate using the displacement field recorded on an array of 20 absolutely calibrated PZT receivers. We first calibrated the receiver array using glass capillary fracture. We proceeded to use a conical PZT transducer to actively produce a source at the origin, allowing us to study the displacement field produced on the now calibrated PZT receiver array. We studied two types of HVP: An impulsive and step source. The calibrated receiver array was used to estimate the general shape of the force–time functions for each type of HVP. From our hypothesized force–time functions we were able to estimate the peak force produced by the PZT actuator: The impulsive source generated a force of $$fpeak = 2.90 \pm 0.42$$ N and the step source generated $$fpeak = 1.79 \pm 0.30$$ N, respectively, for a peak applied voltage of 273 V. This translates to an applied force of $$\sim $$ 0.011 N/V and 0.007 N/V for the impulse and step force–time functions, respectively, which is similar to estimates found in the literature for other conical transducers in contact with metallic transfer media. This measurement was verified directly by independent measurements of the peak force $$fpeak$$ using a dynamic force transducer. We found that our methodology correctly estimated the magnitude of the force but is limited to transducers with incident angles $$\theta<$$ 53$$\circ $$. Beyond this angle, overestimates of the force were observed due to the lack of body wave energy produced by the source. These results allow us to quantitatively determine the forces produced by active PZT techniques using only the measurement of the displacement field captured on a calibrated conical PZT array. Quantitative understanding of active PZT sources additionally constrains the transfer functions approach, which is commonly used in the non-destructive testing of materials and in other fields, such as rock physics and laboratory seismology.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysics and Sensor Technology · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Aki, K., Richards, P.G.: Quantitative Seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA (2002)
2. Bertschi, R.: AE-Amp User Manual. Elsys AG, Mellingerstrasse 12 CH-5443 Niederrohrdorf (2018)
3. Bracewell, R.N.: The Fast Fourier Transform and Its Applications. McGraw Hill, New York (1986)
4. Breckenridge, F., Proctor, T., Hsu, N., Fick, S., Eitzen, D.: Transient sources for acoustic emission work. In: Yamaguchi, K., Takakashi, H., Niitsuma, H. (eds.) Progress in Acoustic Emissions. Japanese Society for Non-Destructive Inspection, Tokyo (1990)
5. Christensen, D.A.: Transducers. Beam Patterns, and Resolution, pp. 69–121. Wiley, New York (1988)
6. Eitzen, D.G., Wadley, H.N.G.: Acoustic emission: establishing the fundamentals. J. Res. Natl. Bureau Stand. 89(1), 75 (1984)10.6028/jres.089.008 ↗
7. Eitzen, D.G., Breckenridge, F.R., Clough, R.B., Fuller, E.R., Hsu, N.N., Simmons, J.A.: Summary of fundamental developments for quantitative acoustic emission measurements. Tech. Rep. EPRI-NP–1877, United States, http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:12632834 (1981)
8. Fan, W., Qiao, P.: Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct. Health Monit. 10(1), 83–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/147592171036541910.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
9. Fick, E.E., Proctor, T.M.: Long-term stability of the nist conical reference transducer. Tech. rep, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2011)10.6028/jres.116.024 ↗
10. Fink, M.: Time reversal of ultrasonic fields. I. Basic principles. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 39(5), 555–566 (1992)10.1109/58.156174 ↗
11. Glaser, S.D., Weiss, G.G., Johnson, L.R.: Body waves recorded inside an elastic half-space by an embedded, wideband velocity sensor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104(3), 1404–1412 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.42435010.1121/1.424350 ↗
12. Greenspan, M.: The NBS conical transducer: analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81(1), 173–183 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.39502710.1121/1.395027 ↗
13. Grosse, C.U., Ohtsu, M. (eds.): Acoustic Emission Testing. Springer, Berlin (2008)
14. Ham, S., Popovics, J.S.: Application of micro-electro-mechanical sensors contactless NDT of concrete structures. Sensors 15(4), 9078–9096 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s15040907810.3390/s150409078 ↗
15. He, J., Huo, H., Guan, X., Yang, J.: A Lamb wave quantification model for inclined cracks with experimental validation. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34(2), 601–611 (2021)10.1016/j.cja.2020.02.010 ↗
16. Hsu, N.: Dynamic Green’s functions of an infinite plate – a computer program. Tech. Rep. Technical Report No. NBSIR 85-3234, National Bureau of Standards, Center for Manufacturing Engineering (1985)10.6028/NBS.IR.85-3234 ↗
17. Johnson, L.R.: Green’s function for Lamb’s problem. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 37, 99–131 (1974)10.1111/j.1365-246X.1974.tb02446.x ↗
18. Lamb, H.: On the propagation of tremors over the surface of an elastic solid. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 203(359–371), 1–42 (1904). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1904.001310.1098/rsta.1904.0013 ↗
19. Lei, X., Ma, S.: Laboratory acoustic emission study for earthquake generation process. Earthq. Sci. 27, 627–646 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-014-0103-y10.1007/s11589-014-0103-y ↗
20. Lockner, D.: The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 30(7):883–899, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014890629390041B (1993)10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B ↗
21. Lord, A.E.: Acoustic Emission – An Update. In: MASON WP, THURSTON R (eds) Physical Acoustics, Physical Acoustics, Vol.15, Academic Press, pp 295–360, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-477915-0.50009-9, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124779150500099 (1981)10.1016/B978-0-12-477915-0.50009-9 ↗
22. Main, I.G., Meredith, P.G., Jones, C.: A reinterpretation of the precursory seismic b-value anomaly from fracture mechanics. Geophys. J. Int. 96(1), 131–138 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb05255.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb05255.x ↗
23. Manthei, G.: Characterization of acoustic emission sources in a rock salt specimen under triaxial compression. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95(5), 1674–1700 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1785/012004007610.1785/0120040076 ↗
24. Manthei, G., Plenkers, K.: Review on in situ acoustic emission monitoring in the context of structural health monitoring in mines. Appl. Sci. 8(9), 1595 (2018)10.3390/app8091595 ↗
25. McLaskey, G.C., Glaser, S.D.: Hertzian impact: experimental study of the force pulse and resulting stress waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 1087–1096 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.346684710.1121/1.3466847 ↗
26. McLaskey, G.C., Glaser, S.D.: Acoustic emission sensor calibration for absolute source measurements. J. Nondestr. Eval. 31(2), 157–168 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-012-0131-210.1007/s10921-012-0131-2 ↗
27. McLaskey, G.C., Lockner, D.A., Kilgore, B.D., Beeler, N.: A robust calibration technique for acoustic systems. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 105(1), 257–271 (2015)10.1785/0120140170 ↗
28. Mogi, K.: Experimental study on the mechanism of the earthquake occurrences of volcanic origin. Bull. Volcanol. 26(1), 197–208 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0259728610.1007/BF02597286 ↗
29. Ohtsu, M.: Simplified moment tensor analysis and unified decomposition of acoustic emission source: application to in situ hydrofracturing test. J. Geophys. Res. 96(B4), 6211–6221 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB0268910.1029/90JB02689 ↗
30. Ohtsu, M., Ono, K.: A generalized theory of acoustic emission and Green’s functions in a half space. J. Acoust. Emiss. 5, 124–133 (1984)
31. Ohtsu, M., Ono, K.: The generalized theory and source representations of acoustic emission. J. Acoust. Emiss. 3, 27–40 (1984)
32. Ono, K.: Rayleigh wave calibration of acoustic emission sensors and ultrasonic transducers. Sensors 19(4), 3129 (2019)10.3390/s19143129 ↗
33. Pekeris, C.L.: The seismic surface pulse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 41(7), 469 (1955)10.1073/pnas.41.7.469 ↗
34. Proctor, T.M.: An improved piezoelectric acoustic emission transducer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71(5), 1163–1168 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.38776310.1121/1.387763 ↗
35. Qiu, L., Yan, X., Lin, X., Yuan, S.: Multiphysics simulation method of lamb wave propagation with piezoelectric transducers under load condition. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 32(5), 1071–1086 (2019)10.1016/j.cja.2019.02.007 ↗
36. Rayleigh, L.: On waves propagated along the plane surface of an elastic solid. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s1–17(1):4–11 (1885). https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-17.1.410.1112/plms/s1-17.1.4 ↗
37. Sause, M.G.R., Hamstad, M.A.: Numerical modeling of existing acoustic emission sensor absolute calibration approaches. Sens. Actuators A 269, 294–307 (2018)10.1016/j.sna.2017.11.057 ↗
38. Selvadurai, P.A.: Laboratory insight into seismic estimates of energy partitioning during dynamic rupture: an observable scaling breakdown. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 11350–11379 (2019)10.1029/2018JB017194 ↗
39. Wu, B.S., McLaskey, G.C.: Broadband calibration of acoustic emission and ultrasonic sensors from generalized ray theory and finite element models. J. Nondestructive Eval. 37(8):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0462-8 (2018)10.1007/s10921-018-0462-8 ↗
40. Wu, R., Selvadurai, P.A., Chen, C., Moradian, O.: Revisiting piezoelectric sensor calibration methods using elastodynamic body waves. J. Nondestr. Eval. 40(3), 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00799-110.1007/s10921-021-00799-1 ↗