Physics-Informed Neural Network for Ultrasound Nondestructive Quantification of Surface Breaking Cracks
Source abstract
Abstract
We introduce an optimized physics-informed neural network (PINN) trained to solve the problem of identifying and characterizing a surface breaking crack in a metal plate. PINNs are neural networks that can combine data and physics in the learning process by adding the residuals of a system of Partial Differential Equations to the loss function. Our PINN is supervised with realistic ultrasonic surface acoustic wave data acquired at a frequency of 5 MHz. The ultrasonic surface wave data is represented as a surface deformation on the top surface of a metal plate, measured by using the method of laser vibrometry. The PINN is physically informed by the acoustic wave equation and its convergence is sped up using adaptive activation functions. The adaptive activation function uses a scalable hyperparameter in the activation function, which is optimized to achieve best performance of the network as it changes dynamically the topology of the loss function involved in the optimization process. The usage of adaptive activation function significantly improves the convergence, notably observed in the current study. We use PINNs to estimate the speed of sound of the metal plate, which we do with an error of 1\%, and then, by allowing the speed of sound to be space dependent, we identify and characterize the crack as the positions where the speed of sound has decreased. Our study also shows the effect of sub-sampling of the data on the sensitivity of sound speed estimates. More broadly, the resulting model shows a promising deep neural network model for ill-posed inverse problems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Acoustic properties for metals in solid: From NDT Resource Center. https://www.nde-ed.org/GeneralResources/MaterialProperties/UT/ut_matlprop_metals.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2019
2. Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M.T., Frey, B.J.: Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 33(8), 831 (2015)10.1038/nbt.3300 ↗
3. Baydin, A.G., Pearlmutter, B.A., Radul, A.A., Siskind, J.M.: Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(153), 1–43 (2018)
4. Blackshire, J.L.: Ultrasonic scattering from complex crack morphology features. In: 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 248–251. IEEE (2012)10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0061 ↗
5. Blackshire, J.L.: Enhanced damage characterization using wavefield imaging methods. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1806, p. 090008. AIP, College Park (2017)10.1063/1.4974652 ↗
6. Blackshire, J.L., Sathish, S.: Near-field ultrasonic scattering from surface-breaking cracks. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80(18), 3442–3444 (2002)10.1063/1.1476722 ↗
7. Carcione, J.M.: Wave Fields in Real Media: Wave Propagation in Anisotropic, Anelastic, Porous and Electromagnetic Media, vol. 38. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
8. Dawson, A.J., Michaels, J.E., Michaels, T.E.: Isolation of ultrasonic scattering by wavefield baseline subtraction. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 70, 891–903 (2016)10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.09.008 ↗
9. Goyal, P., Dollár, P., Girshick, R., Noordhuis, P., Wesolowski, L., Kyrola, A., Tulloch, A., Jia, Y., He, K.: Accurate, large minibatch SGD: Training imagenet in 1 hour. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02677 (2017)
10. Jagtap, A.D., Kawaguchi, K., Karniadakis, G.E.: Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks. J. Comput. Phys. 404, 109136 (2020)10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109136 ↗
11. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)
12. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)
13. Lake, B.M., Salakhutdinov, R., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science 350(6266), 1332–1338 (2015)10.1126/science.aab3050 ↗
14. Nielsen, M., Lund, O.: Nn-align. an artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction. BMC Bioinform. 10(1), 296 (2009)10.1186/1471-2105-10-296 ↗
15. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
16. Pohl, J., Mook, G.: Laser-vibrometric analysis of propagation and interaction of Lamb waves in CFRP-plates. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 4(1), 77–85 (2013)10.1007/s13272-012-0057-5 ↗
17. Raissi, M., Karniadakis, G.E.: Hidden physics models: machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 357, 125–141 (2018)10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.039 ↗
18. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., Karniadakis, G.E.: Machine learning of linear differential equations using gaussian processes. J. Comput. Phys. 348, 683–693 (2017)10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.050 ↗
19. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., Karniadakis, G.E.: Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Computat. Phys. 378, 686–707 (2019)10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
20. Raissi, M., Wang, Z., Triantafyllou, M.S., Karniadakis, G.E.: Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations. J. Fluid Mech. 861, 119–137 (2019)10.1017/jfm.2018.872 ↗
21. Rudy, S.H., Brunton, S.L., Proctor, J.L., Kutz, J.N.: Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations. Sci. Adv. 3(4), e1602614 (2017)10.1126/sciadv.1602614 ↗
22. Tian, Z., Yu, L.: Lamb wave frequency-wavenumber analysis and decomposition. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 25(9), 1107–1123 (2014)10.1177/1045389X14521875 ↗
23. Wang, Y.E., Wei, G.Y., Brooks, D.: Benchmarking TPU, GPU, and CPU platforms for deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.10701 (2019)