Review of Current Trends and Uses of Machine Learning for Discrete Acoustic Emission Interpretation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Acoustic Emission (AE) is a well-established and recognised technique for monitoring the degradation of a variety of structures. It is used in a variety of applications, including fatigue monitoring, corrosion monitoring, or detection of pressure leaks. As sensors evolve and databases grow, analysis allows for a better interpretation and understanding of phenomena. Specifically, the usage of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms has proven to be a major tool for interpreting signals. This paper reviews the current usage of ML algorithms used in major Acoustic Emission applications to interpret damage mechanisms, exploring how ML allows the study of more complex phenomena and structures, discussing the conditions, precautions and limitations to its usage as well as future prospects and potentials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Geoscience and Mining Technology · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Eitzen, D.G., Wadley, H.N.G.: Acoustic Emission: Establishing the Fundamentals. J. Res. Natl. Bureau Stand. 89(1), 75 (1984). https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.089.00810.6028/jres.089.008 ↗
2. Grosse, C.U., Ohtsu, M., Aggelis, D.G., Shiotani, T.: Acoustic Emission Testing: Basics for Research – Applications in Engineering. Springer Nature (2021)10.1007/978-3-030-67936-1 ↗
3. Ennaceur, C., Laksimi, A., Hervé, C., Cherfaoui, M.: Monitoring crack growth in pressure vessel steels by the acoustic emission technique and the method of potential difference. Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping 83(3), 197–204 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.12.00410.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.12.004 ↗
4. Morhain, A., Mba, D.: Bearing defect diagnosis and acoustic emission. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol. 217(4), 257–272 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1243/13506500376861861410.1243/135065003768618614 ↗
5. Mazille, H., Rothea, R., Tronel, C.: An acoustic emission technique for monitoring pitting corrosion of austenitic stainless steels. Corros. Sci. 37(9), 1365–1375 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(95)00036-J10.1016/0010-938X(95)00036-J ↗
6. Rettig, T.W., Felsen, M.J.: Acoustic Emission Method for Monitoring Corrosion Reactions. Corrosion 32(4), 121–126 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-32.4.12110.5006/0010-9312-32.4.121 ↗
7. Weng, M.S., Dunn, S.E., Hartt, W.H., Brown, R.P.: Application of Acoustic Emission to Detection of Reinforcing Steel Corrosion in Concrete. Corrosion 38(1), 9–14 (1982). https://doi.org/10.5006/1.357732210.5006/1.3577322 ↗
8. Yoon, D.-J., Weiss, W.J., Shah, S.P.: Assessing Damage in Corroded Reinforced Concrete Using Acoustic Emission. J. Eng. Mech. 126(3), 273–283 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:3(273)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:3(273) ↗
9. Huguet, S., Godin, N., Gaertner, R., Salmon, L., Villard, D.: Use of acoustic emission to identify damage modes in glass fibre reinforced polyester. Compos. Sci. Technol. 62(10–11), 1433–1444 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00087-810.1016/S0266-3538(02)00087-8 ↗
10. Johnson, M.: Waveform based clustering and classification of ae transients in composite laminates using principal component analysis. NDT ‘I & E Int. 35, 367–376 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00004-X10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00004-X ↗
11. Nishihara, H., Bessho, Y.: Acoustic Emission in Subcooled Nucleate Pool Boiling. J. Nuclear Sci. Technol. 14(6), 407–415 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1977.973077910.1080/18811248.1977.9730779 ↗
12. Pahlavan, P.L., Paulissen, J., Pijpers, R., Hakkesteegt, H., Jansen, R.: Acoustic Emission Health Monitoring of Steel Bridges. EWSHM - 7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Nantes, France (2014). IFFSTTAR, Inria, Université de Nantes. https://inria.hal.science/hal-01021221
13. Anastassopoulos, A.A., Philippidis, T.P.: Clustering methodology for the evaluation of acoustic emission from composites. J. Acoust. Emission 13, 11–22 (1995)
14. Emamian, V., Kaveh, M., Tewfik, A.H.: Robust clustering of acoustic emission signals using the Kohonen network. In: 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100), vol. 6, pp. 3891–38946 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2000.86025310.1109/ICASSP.2000.860253 ↗
15. Omkar, S.N., Suresh, S., Raghavendra, T.R., Mani, V.: Acoustic emission signal classification using fuzzy c-means clustering. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2002. ICONIP ’02., vol. 4, pp. 1827–18314 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIP.2002.119898910.1109/ICONIP.2002.1198989 ↗
16. Wirtz, S.F., Bach, S., Söffker, D.: Experimental Results of Acoustic Emission Attenuation Due toWave Propagation in Composites. Ann. Conf. PHM Soc. 11(1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2019.v11i1.82110.36001/phmconf.2019.v11i1.821 ↗
17. Muir, C., Swaminathan, B., Almansour, A.S., Sevener, K., Smith, C., Presby, M., Kiser, J.D., Pollock, T.M., Daly, S.: Damage mechanism identification in composites via machine learning and acoustic emission. NPJ Comput. Mater. 7(1), 1–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00565-x10.1038/s41524-021-00565-x ↗
18. Ai, L., Soltangharaei, V., Ziehl, P.: Developing a heterogeneous ensemble learning framework to evaluate Alkali-silica reaction damage in concrete using acoustic emission signals. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 172, 108981 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10898110.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108981 ↗
19. Dubuc, B., Ebrahimkhanlou, A., Livadiotis, S., Salamone, S.: Inversion algorithm for lamb-wave-based depth characterization of acoustic emission sources in plate-like structures. Ultrasonics 99, 105975 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2019.10597510.1016/j.ultras.2019.105975 ↗
20. Ebrahimkhanlou, A., Dubuc, B., Salamone, S.: A generalizable deep learning framework for localizing and characterizing acoustic emission sources in riveted metallic panels. Mech Syst Signal Process 130, 248–272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.05010.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.050 ↗
21. Jirarungsatian, C., Prateepasen, A.: Pitting and uniform corrosion source recognition using acoustic emission parameters. Corrosion Sci. 52, 187–197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2009.09.00110.1016/j.corsci.2009.09.001 ↗
22. Hamdi, S.E.: Contribution au traitement du signal pour le contrôle de santé in situ de structures composites : application au suivi de température et à l’analyse des signaux d’émission acoustique. PhD thesis (2012). Thèse de doctorat dirigée par Simon, LaurentBen Ghozlen, Mohamed Hédi et Le Duff, Alain Acoustique Le Mans 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012LEMA1017
23. Gholizadeh, S., Leman, Z., Baharudin, B.T.H.T.: A review of the application of acoustic emission technique in engineering. Struct. Eng. Mech. 54(6), 1075–1095 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2015.54.6.107510.12989/SEM.2015.54.6.1075 ↗
24. Zaki, A., Chai, H.K., Aggelis, D.G., Alver, N.: Non-destructive evaluation for corrosion monitoring in concrete: a review and capability of acoustic emission technique. Sensors 15(8), 19069–19101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s15081906910.3390/s150819069 ↗
25. Behnia, A., Chai, H.K., Shiotani, T.: Advanced structural health monitoring of concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission. Construct. Build. Mater. 65, 282–302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.103 ↗
26. Calabrese, L., Proverbio, E.: A Review on the Applications of Acoustic Emission Technique in the Study of Stress Corrosion Cracking. Corros. Mater. Degrad. 2(1), 1–30 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd201000110.3390/cmd2010001 ↗
27. Ciaburro, G., Iannace, G.: Machine-Learning-Based Methods for Acoustic Emission Testing: A Review. Appl. Sci. 12(20), 10476 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12201047610.3390/app122010476 ↗
28. Van Steen, C., Vandecruys, E., Wevers, M.: Steel corrosion damage monitoring in reinforced concrete structures with the acoustic emission technique: A review. Construct. Build. Mater. 349, 128732 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12873210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128732 ↗
29. Zhou, W., Pan, Z.-b., Wang, J., Qiao, S., Ma, L.-h., Liu, J., Ren, X.-y., Liang, Y.-z.: Review on acoustic emission source location, damage recognition and lifetime prediction of fiber-reinforced composites. J. Mater. Sci. 58(2), 583–607 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-08063-110.1007/s10853-022-08063-1 ↗
30. Morizet, N., Godin, N., Tang, J., Maillet, E., Fregonese, M., Normand, B.: Classification of acoustic emission signals using wavelets and Random Forests: Application to localized corrosion. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 70–71, 1026–1037 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.09.02510.1016/j.ymssp.2015.09.025 ↗
31. Xu, D., Liu, P., Chen, Z., Cai, Q., Leng, J.: Dynamic feature evaluation on streaming acoustic emission data for adhesively bonded joints for composite wind turbine blade. Struct. Health Monitor. 21(2), 387–406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921721100170410.1177/14759217211001704 ↗
32. Sibil, A., Godin, N., R’Mili, M., Maillet, E., Fantozzi, G.: Optimization of Acoustic Emission Data Clustering by a Genetic Algorithm Method. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 31(2), 169–180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-012-0132-110.1007/s10921-012-0132-1 ↗
33. Noipitak, M., Prateepasen, A.: Effects of Wave Propagation Paths and System Calibration on Uniform Corrosion Monitoring Using Acoustic Emission. Corrosion 67(11), 115003–11500310 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5006/1.365950310.5006/1.3659503 ↗
34. Ramasso, E., Placet, V., Boubakar, M.L.: Unsupervised Consensus Clustering of Acoustic Emission Time-Series for Robust Damage Sequence Estimation in Composites. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 64(12), 3297–3307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2015.245035410.1109/TIM.2015.2450354 ↗
35. Almeida, R.S.M., Magalhães, M.D., Karim, M.N., Tushtev, K., Rezwan, K.: Identifying damage mechanisms of composites by acoustic emission and supervised machine learning. Mater. Design 227, 111745 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11174510.1016/j.matdes.2023.111745 ↗
36. Saeedifar, M., Zarouchas, D.: Damage characterization of laminated composites using acoustic emission: A review. Compos. Part B: Eng. 195, 108039 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10803910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108039 ↗
37. Biswas, A.K., Datta, A.K., Topdar, P., Sengupta, S.: Acoustic Emission-based Damage Detection and Classification in Steel Frame Structure Using Wavelet Transform and Random Forest. Period. Polytech. Civil Eng. 66(4), 1183–1198 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.2044710.3311/PPci.20447 ↗
38. Kaphle, M.R.: Analysis of acoustic emission data for accurate damage assessment for structural health monitoring applications. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology (2012)
39. Maillet, E., Baker, C., Morscher, G.N., Pujar, V.V., Lemanski, J.R.: Feasibility and limitations of damage identification in composite materials using acoustic emission. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 75, 77–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.003 ↗
40. Sause, M.G., Horn, S.R.: Influence of specimen geometry on acoustic emission signals in fiber reinforced composites: Fem-simulations and experiments (2010). https://www.ndt.net/?id=9737
41. Ospitia, N., Aggelis, D.G., Tsangouri, E.: Dimension effects on the acoustic behavior of trc plates. Materials 13(4), 955 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1304095510.3390/ma13040955 ↗
42. Calabrese, L., Galeano, M., Proverbio, E., Pietro, D.D., Donato, A., Cappuccini, F.: Advanced signal analysis of acoustic emission data to discrimination of different corrosion forms. Int. J. Microstruct. Mater. Prop. 12(3–4), 147–164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMP.2017.09109510.1504/IJMMP.2017.091095 ↗
43. Fotouhi, M., Sadeghi, S., Jalalvand, M., Ahmadi, M.: Analysis of the damage mechanisms in mixed-mode delamination of laminated composites using acoustic emission data clustering. J. Thermoplas. Compos. Mater. 30(3), 318–340 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571559836210.1177/0892705715598362 ↗
44. Pashmforoush, F., Khamedi, R., Fotouhi, M., Hajikhani, M., Ahmadi, M.: Damage Classification of Sandwich Composites Using Acoustic Emission Technique and k-means Genetic Algorithm. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 33(4), 481–492 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-014-0243-y10.1007/s10921-014-0243-y ↗
45. Pomponi, E., Vinogradov, A.: A real-time approach to acoustic emission clustering. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 40(2), 791–804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.03.01710.1016/j.ymssp.2013.03.017 ↗
46. Doan, D.D., Ramasso, E., Placet, V., Zhang, S., Boubakar, L., Zerhouni, N.: An unsupervised pattern recognition approach for AE data originating from fatigue tests on polymer-composite materials. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 64–65, 465–478 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.01110.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.011 ↗
47. Calabrese, L., Campanella, G., Proverbio, E.: Noise removal by cluster analysis after long time AE corrosion monitoring of steel reinforcement in concrete. Construct. Build. Mater. 34, 362–371 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.04610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.046 ↗
48. Barat, V., Borodin, Y., Kuzmin, A.: Intelligent ae signal filtering methods. J. Acoust. Emis. 28, 109–119 (2010)
49. Theobald, P., Zeqiri, B., Avison, J.: Couplants and their influence on ae sensor sensitivity. J. Acoust. Emiss 26, 91–97 (2008). https://www.ndt.net/?id=14501
50. Ono, K.: Through-transmission characteristics of ae sensor couplants. J. Acoust. Emiss 34, 1–11 (2017). https://www.ndt.net/?id=21550
51. Aggelis, D.G.: Classification of cracking mode in concrete by acoustic emission parameters. Mech. Res. Commun. 38(3), 153–157 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.03.00710.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.03.007 ↗
52. RILEM Technical Committee (Masayasu Ohtsu): Recommendation of RILEM TC 212-ACD: Acoustic emission and related NDE techniques for crack detection and damage evaluation in concrete: Test method for classification of active cracks in concrete structures by acoustic emission. Mater. Struct. 43(9), 1187–1189 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9640-610.1617/s11527-010-9640-6 ↗
53. Colombo, I.S., Main, I.G., Forde, M.C.: Assessing Damage of Reinforced Concrete Beam Using “b -value’’ Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 15(3), 280–286 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(280)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(280) ↗
54. Mandal, D.D., Bentahar, M., El Mahi, A., Brouste, A., El Guerjouma, R., Montresor, S., Cartiaux, F.-B.: Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Progressive Damage of Reinforced Concrete T-Beams under Four-Point Bending. Materials 15(10), 3486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1510348610.3390/ma15103486 ↗
55. Peeters, G.: A large set of audio features for sound description (similarity and classification) in the cuidado project. CUIDADO Ist Project Rep. 54, 1–25 (2004)
56. Ech-Choudany, Y., Scida, D., Assarar, M., Bellach, B., Morain-Nicolier, F.: Implementation of Supervised Classification Method of Acoustic Emission Signals: Damage Mechanisms Identification of Non-hybrid and Hybrid Flax Fibre Composites. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 41(1), 19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-022-00850-910.1007/s10921-022-00850-9 ↗
57. Gabor, D.: Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information. J. Inst. Electr. Eng.-Part III: Radio Commun. Eng. 93(26), 429–441 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1049/ji-3-2.1946.007410.1049/ji-3-2.1946.0074 ↗
58. Grossmann, A., Morlet, J.: Decomposition of hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15(4), 723–736 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1137/051505610.1137/0515056 ↗
59. Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, H.H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung, C.C., Liu, H.H.: The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 454(1971), 903–995 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.019310.1098/rspa.1998.0193 ↗
60. Van Steen, C., Pahlavan, L., Wevers, M., Verstrynge, E.: Localisation and characterisation of corrosion damage in reinforced concrete by means of acoustic emission and X-ray computed tomography. Construct. Build. Mater. 197, 21–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.15910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.159 ↗
61. Mukherjee, A., Maurya, A.: Identification of Different Acoustic Emission Signal Sources. In: 2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC), pp. 1–6. IEEE. Bhubaneswar, India (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/AESPC44649.2018.903322610.1109/AESPC44649.2018.9033226 ↗
62. Griffin, J.M., Chen, X.: Multiple classification of the acoustic emission signals extracted during burn and chatter anomalies using genetic programming. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 45(11), 1152 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2026-710.1007/s00170-009-2026-7 ↗
63. Ito, K., Enoki, M.: Acquisition and Analysis of Continuous Acoustic Emission Waveform for Classification of Damage Sources in Ceramic Fiber Mat. Mater. Trans. 48(6), 1221–1226 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.I-MRA200785010.2320/matertrans.I-MRA2007850 ↗
64. Van Dijck, G., Van Hulle, M.M.: Genetic algorithm for informative basis function selection from the wavelet packet decomposition with application to corrosion identification using acoustic emission. Chemometr. Intell. Laborat. Syst. 107(2), 318–332 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.05.00110.1016/j.chemolab.2011.05.001 ↗
65. Van Dijck, G., Van Hulle, M.M.: Information Theory Filters for Wavelet Packet Coefficient Selection with Application to Corrosion Type Identification from Acoustic Emission Signals. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 11(6), 5695–5715 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3390/s11060569510.3390/s110605695 ↗
66. May, Z., Alam, M.K., Nayan, N.A., Rahman, N.A.A., Mahmud, M.S.: Acoustic emission corrosion feature extraction and severity prediction using hybrid wavelet packet transform and linear support vector classifier. Plos One 16(12), 0261040 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.026104010.1371/journal.pone.0261040 ↗
67. Zhao, J., Wang, K., Guo, Y.: Acoustic emission signals classification based on support vector machine. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 6–3006304 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCET.2010.548624010.1109/ICCET.2010.5486240 ↗
68. Ai, L., Flowers, S., Mesaric, T., Henderson, B., Houck, S., Ziehl, P.: Acoustic Emission-Based Detection of Impacts on Thermoplastic Aircraft Control Surfaces: A Preliminary Study. Appl. Sci. 13(11), 6573 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1311657310.3390/app13116573 ↗
69. Satour, A., Montrésor, S., Bentahar, M., Boubenider, F.: Wavelet Based Clustering of Acoustic Emission Hits to Characterize Damage Mechanisms in Composites. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 39(2), 37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00678-110.1007/s10921-020-00678-1 ↗
70. Marec, A., Thomas, J.-H., El Guerjouma, R.: Damage characterization of polymer-based composite materials: Multivariable analysis and wavelet transform for clustering acoustic emission data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22(6), 1441–1464 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.11.02910.1016/j.ymssp.2007.11.029 ↗
71. Hamdi, S.E., Le Duff, A., Simon, L., Plantier, G., Sourice, A., Feuilloy, M.: Acoustic emission pattern recognition approach based on Hilbert-Huang transform for structural health monitoring in polymer-composite materials. Appl. Acoust. 74(5), 746–757 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.11.01810.1016/j.apacoust.2012.11.018 ↗
72. Chai, M., Gao, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Duan, Q., Chen, R.: An approach for identifying corrosion damage from acoustic emission signals using ensemble empirical mode decomposition and linear discriminant analysis. Meas. Sci. Technol. 33(6), 065018 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac4ed710.1088/1361-6501/ac4ed7 ↗
73. Qin, X., Li, Q., Dong, X., Lv, S., 10.1155/2017/262308: The Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearing Based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and Random Forest. Shock Vibration 2017, 2623081 (2017)10.1155/2017/2623081 ↗
74. Liu, L., Chen, L., Wang, Z., Liu, D.: Early Fault Detection of Planetary Gearbox Based on Acoustic Emission and Improved Variational Mode Decomposition. IEEE Sensors J. 21(2), 1735–1745 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.301588410.1109/JSEN.2020.3015884 ↗
75. Kedadouche, M., Thomas, M., Tahan, A.: A comparative study between empirical wavelet transforms and empirical mode decomposition methods: Application to bearing defect diagnosis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 81, 88–107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.04910.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.049 ↗
76. Wang, K., Hao, Q., Zhang, X., Tang, Z., Wang, Y., Shen, Y.: Blind source extraction of acoustic emission signals for rail cracks based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and constrained independent component analysis. Measurement 157, 107653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10765310.1016/j.measurement.2020.107653 ↗
77. Quinn, A.J., Lopes-dos-Santos, V., Dupret, D., Nobre, A.C., Woolrich, M.W.: EMD: Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert-Huang Spectral Analyses in Python. J. Open Sourc. Softw. 6(59), 2977 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.0297710.21105/joss.02977 ↗
78. Vélez, W., Matta, F., Ziehl, P.: Acoustic emission monitoring of early corrosion in prestressed concrete piles. Struct. Control Health Monitor. 22(5), 873–887 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.172310.1002/stc.1723 ↗
79. ElBatanouny, M.K., Mangual, J., Ziehl, P.H., Matta, F.: Early Corrosion Detection in Prestressed Concrete Girders Using Acoustic Emission. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 26(3), 504–511 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000084510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000845 ↗
80. Fowler, T., Blessing, J., Conlisk, P., Swanson, T.: The MONPAC system. J. Acoust. Emission 8, 1 (1989)
81. Tinkey, B.V., Fowler, T., Klingner, R.E.: Nondestructive testing of prestressed bridge girders with distributed damage. Res. Rep. 1857 (2002)
82. Zheng, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., Pan, T., Sun, L., Liu, D.: Localized corrosion induced damage monitoring of large-scale RC piles using acoustic emission technique in the marine environment. Construct. Build. Mater. 243, 118270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11827010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118270 ↗
83. Appalla, A., ElBatanouny, M.K., Velez, W., Ziehl, P.: Assessing Corrosion Damage in Posttensioned Concrete Structures Using Acoustic Emission. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 28(2), 04015128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000138910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001389 ↗
84. Singh, D., Singh, B.: Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. Appl. Soft Comput. 97, 105524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.10552410.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524 ↗
85. Xu, D., Liu, P.F., Li, J.G., Chen, Z.P.: Damage mode identification of adhesive composite joints under hygrothermal environment using acoustic emission and machine learning. Composite Struct. 211, 351–363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.05110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.051 ↗
86. Calabrese, L., Galeano, M., Proverbio, E., Pietro, D.D., Cappuccini, F., Donato, A.: Monitoring of 13% Cr martensitic stainless steel corrosion in chloride solution in presence of thiosulphate by acoustic emission technique. Corrosion Sci. 111, 151–161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.01010.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.010 ↗
87. Smolnicki, M., Duda, Sz., Stabla, P., Zielonka, P., Lesiuk, G.: Acoustic emission with machine learning in fracture of composites: Preliminary study. Arch. Civil Mech. Eng. 23(4), 254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00795-410.1007/s43452-023-00795-4 ↗
88. Sause, M.G.R., Gribov, A., Unwin, A.R., Horn, S.: Pattern recognition approach to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 33(1), 17–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.09.01810.1016/j.patrec.2011.09.018 ↗
89. Traoré, O.I.: Méthodologie de traitement et d’analyse de signaux expérimentaux d’Émission Acoustique : Application au comportement d’un élément combustible en situation accidentelle. PhD thesis, Aix-Marseille Université (2018). https://theses.hal.science/tel-03337702
90. Malik, S., Rouf, R., Mazur, K., Kontsos, A.: The Industry Internet of Things (IIoT) as a Methodology for Autonomous Diagnostics in Aerospace Structural Health Monitoring. Aerospace 7, 64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace705006410.3390/aerospace7050064 ↗
91. Refahi Oskouei, A., Heidary, H., Ahmadi, M., Farajpur, M.: Unsupervised acoustic emission data clustering for the analysis of damage mechanisms in glass/polyester composites. Mater. Des. 37, 416–422 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.01810.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.018 ↗
92. Zhang, Y., Zhou, B., Yu, F., Chen, C.: Cluster analysis of acoustic emission signals and infrared thermography for defect evolution analysis of glass/epoxy composites. Infrared Phys. Technol. 112, 103581 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.10358110.1016/j.infrared.2020.103581 ↗
93. Ding, C., He, X.: K -means clustering via principal component analysis. In: Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning - ICML ’04, p. 29. ACM Press, Banff, Alberta, Canada (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.101540810.1145/1015330.1015408 ↗
94. Placet, V., Ramasso, E., Boubakar, L., Zerhouni, N.: Online segmentation of acoustic emission data streams for detection of damages in composites structures in unconstrained environments. In: 11th International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability, France, pp. 1–8 (2013). https://hal.science/hal-00993426
95. Aggarwal, C.C., Hinneburg, A., Keim, D.A.: On the Surprising Behavior of Distance Metrics in High Dimensional Space. pp. 420–434. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44503-X_2710.1007/3-540-44503-X_27 ↗
96. He, X., Cai, D., Niyogi, P.: Laplacian score for feature selection. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 18 (2005)
97. Li, L., Lomov, S.V., Yan, X., Carvelli, V.: Cluster analysis of acoustic emission signals for 2D and 3D woven glass/epoxy composites. Compos. Struct. 116, 286–299 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.023 ↗
98. Carvelli, V., D’Ettorre, A., Lomov, S.V.: Acoustic emission and damage mode correlation in textile reinforced PPS composites. Compos. Struct. 163, 399–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.012 ↗
99. Song, D., Xu, F., Ma, T.: Crack damage monitoring for compressor blades based on acoustic emission with novel feature and hybridized feature selection. Struct. Health Monit. 21(6), 2641–2656 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921721106810710.1177/14759217211068107 ↗
100. Cai, D., Zhang, C., He, X.: Unsupervised feature selection for multi-cluster data. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 333–342. ACM, Washington DC USA (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1835804.183584810.1145/1835804.1835848 ↗