journal article·2023-03

Abnormal Signals Elimination in Hardness Evaluation Using Barkhausen Noise and Tangential Magnetic Field

Cheng Hang, Wenbo Liu, Gerd Dobmann, Wangcai Chen, Lei Li, Ping Wang, Yi Lin, Haixia Zhu, Kaiyu Li

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Sorsa, A., Leiviskä, K., Santa-aho, S., Lepistö, T.: Quantitative prediction of residual stress and hardness in case-hardened steel based on the Barkhausen noise measurement. NDT & E Int. 46, 100–106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.11.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2011.11.008 ↗
2. Franco, F.A., González, M., De Campos, M., Padovese, L.: Relation between magnetic Barkhausen noise and hardness for jominy quench tests in SAE 4140 and 6150 steels. J. Nondestr. Eval. 32, 93–103 (2013)10.1007/s10921-012-0162-8 ↗
3. Ding, S., Tian, G., Sutthaweekul, R.: Non-destructive hardness prediction for 18CrNiMo7–6 steel based on feature selection and fusion of magnetic Barkhausen noise. NDT & E Int. 107, 102138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10213810.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102138 ↗
4. Dong, H., Liu, X., Song, Y., Wang, B., Chen, S., He, C.: Quantitative evaluation of residual stress and surface hardness in deep drawn parts based on magnetic Barkhausen noise technology. Measurement 168, 108473 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10847310.1016/j.measurement.2020.108473 ↗
5. Alberteris Campos, M., Capó-Sánchez, J., Pérez Benítez, J., Padovese, L.R.: Characterization of the elastic–plastic region in AISI/SAE 1070 steel by the magnetic barkhausen noise. NDT & E Int. 41, 656–659 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.003 ↗
6. Caldas-Morgan, M., Padovese, L.R.: Fast detection of the magnetic easy axis on steel sheet using the continuous rotational Barkhausen method. NDT & E Int. 45, 148–155 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.10.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2011.10.003 ↗
7. Xiucheng, L., Ruihuan, Z., Bin, W., Cunfu, H.: Quantitative prediction of surface hardness in 12CrMoV steel plate based on magnetic Barkhausen noise and tangential magnetic field measurements. J. Nondestr. Eval. 37, 1–8 (2018)10.1007/s10921-018-0486-0 ↗
8. Dobmann, G., Pitsch, H.: Magnetic tangential field-strength-inspection, a further NDT tool for 3MA. 636–643 (1989)10.1007/978-3-642-84003-6_75 ↗
9. Li, K., Li, L., Wang, P., Liu, J., Shi, Y., Zhen, Y., Dong, S.: A fast and non-destructive method to evaluate yield strength of cold-rolled steel via incremental permeability. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 498, 166087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16608710.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166087 ↗
10. Gupta, B., Uchimoto, T., Ducharne, B., Sebald, G., Miyazaki, T., Takagi, T.: Magnetic incremental permeability non-destructive evaluation of 12 Cr–Mo–W–V steel creep test samples with varied ageing levels and thermal treatments. NDT & E Int. 104, 42–50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2019.03.006 ↗
11. Artetxe, I., Arizti, F., Martínez-de-Guerenu, A.: Analysis of the voltage drop across the excitation coil for magnetic characterization of skin passed steel samples. Measurement 174, 109000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10900010.1016/j.measurement.2021.109000 ↗
12. Blažek, D., Neslušan, M., Mičica, M., Pištora, J.: Extraction of Barkhausen noise from the measured raw signal in high-frequency regimes. Measurement 94, 456–463 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.02210.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.022 ↗
13. White, S., Krause, T., Clapham, L.: Control of flux in magnetic circuits for Barkhausen noise measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 18, 3501–3510 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/18/11/03410.1088/0957-0233/18/11/034 ↗
14. Stupakov, A., Perevertov, O., Zablotskii, V.: A system for controllable magnetic measurements of hysteresis and Barkhausen noise. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 65, 1087–1097 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2015.249462110.1109/tim.2015.2494621 ↗
15. Santa-aho, S., Laitinen, A., Sorsa, A., Vippola, M.: Barkhausen noise probes and modelling: a review. J. Nondestr. Eval. 38, 1–11 (2019)10.1007/s10921-019-0636-z ↗
16. Ducharne, B.: Micromagnetic nondestructive testing barkhausen noise vs other techniques. 223–238 (2020)10.1016/B978-0-08-102800-1.00008-3 ↗
17. Wolter, B., Gabi, Y., Conrad, C.: Nondestructive testing with 3MA—an overview of principles and applications. Appl. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app906106810.3390/app9061068 ↗
18. Gabi, Y., Martins, O., Wolter, B., Strass, B.: Combination of electromagnetic measurements and FEM simulations for nondestructive determination of mechanical hardness. AIP Adv. 8, 047502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.499366910.1063/1.4993669 ↗
19. Liu, J., Wilson, J., Strangwood, M., Davis, C.L., Peyton, A.: Magnetic characterisation of microstructural feature distribution in P9 and T22 steels by major and minor BH loop measurements. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 401, 579–592 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.10.07510.1016/j.jmmm.2015.10.075 ↗
20. Fillion, G., Lord, M., Bussière, J.: Coercivity measurement from analysis of the tangential magnetic field. 223–230 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0670-0\_2710.1007/978-1-4899-0670-0\_27 ↗
21. Liu, X., Shang, W., He, C., Zhang, R., Wu, B.: Simultaneous quantitative prediction of tensile stress, surface hardness and case depth in medium carbon steel rods based on multifunctional magnetic testing techniques. Measurement 128, 455–463 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.04410.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.044 ↗
22. Honkanen, M., Santa-aho, S., Laurson, L., Eslahi, N., Foi, A., Vippola, M.: Mimicking Barkhausen noise measurement by in-situ transmission electron microscopy—effect of microstructural steel features on Barkhausen noise. Acta Mater. 221, 117378 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11737810.1016/j.actamat.2021.117378 ↗
23. Send, S., Dapprich, D., Thomas, J., Suominen, L.: Non-destructive case depth determination by means of low-frequency Barkhausen noise measurements. J. Nondestr. Eval. 37, 1–10 (2018)10.1007/s10921-018-0538-5 ↗
24. Neslušan, M., Minárik, P., Čilliková, M., Kolařík, K., Rubešová, K.: Barkhausen noise emission in tool steel X210Cr12 after semi-solid processing. Mater. Charact. 157, 109891 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.10989110.1016/j.matchar.2019.109891 ↗
25. Szielasko, K., Mironenko, I., Altpeter, I., Herrmann, H.-G., Boller, C.: Minimalistic devices and sensors for micromagnetic materials characterization. IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 101–104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.221794310.1109/TMAG.2012.2217943 ↗
26. Maciusowicz, M., Psuj, G.: Use of time-frequency representation of magnetic Barkhausen noise for evaluation of easy magnetization axis of grain-oriented steel. Materials. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1315339010.3390/ma13153390 ↗
27. Tomkowski, R., Sorsa, A., Santa-aho, S., Lundin, P., Vippola, M.: Statistical evaluation of Barkhausen noise testing (BNT) for ground samples. Sensors (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1921471610.3390/s19214716 ↗
28. Stupakov, O., Pal’a, J., Takagi, T., Uchimoto, T.: Governing conditions of repeatable Barkhausen noise response. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 2956–2962 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.04.06510.1016/j.jmmm.2009.04.065 ↗
29. Hang, C., Liu, W., Wang, P.: A method of Barkhausen noise feature extraction based on an adaptive threshold. Appl. Sci. 9, 2964 (2019)10.3390/app9152964 ↗
30. Rousseeuw, P.J., Croux, C.: Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 1273–1283 (1993)10.1080/01621459.1993.10476408 ↗