Analysis of the Mechanism of Leakage Magnetic Field Generated by Internal Defects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Jomdecha, C., Prateepasen, A.: Design of modified electromagnetic main-flux for steel wire rope inspection. NDT E Int. 42, 77–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.10.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2007.10.006 ↗
2. Sun, Y., Kang, Y.: High-speed magnetic flux leakage technique and apparatus based on orthogonal magnetization for steel pipe. Mater. Eval. 68, 452–458 (2010)
3. Jinfeng, D., Yihua, K., Xinjun, W.: Tubing thread inspection by magnetic flux leakage. NDT E Int. 39, 53–56 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.06.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2005.06.005 ↗
4. Sakai, K., Morita, K., Haga, Y., Kiwa, T., Inoue, K., Tsukada, K.: Automatic scanning system for back-side defect of Steel structure using magnetic flux leakage method. IEEE Trans. Magn. 51, 1–3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2015.245321110.1109/tmag.2015.2453211 ↗
5. Singh, W.S., Rao, B.P.C., Vaidyanathan, S., Jayakumar, T., Raj, B.: Detection of leakage magnetic flux from near-side and far-side defects in carbon steel plates using a giant magneto-resistive sensor. Meas. Sci. Technol. 19, 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/1/01570210.1088/0957-0233/19/1/015702 ↗
6. Chang, Y., Jiao, J., Li, G., Liu, X., He, C., Wu, B.: Effects of excitation system on the performance of magnetic-flux-leakage-type non-destructive testing. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 268, 201–212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.08.00910.1016/j.sna.2017.08.009 ↗
7. Pignotti, A., Kohan, A.: Importance of magnetic saturation effects in the detection of internal tube cracks by magnetic flux leakage. NDT E Int. 1, 37 (1997)
8. Pham, H.Q., Trinh, Q.T., Doan, D.T., Tran, Q.H.: Importance of magnetizing field on magnetic flux leakage signal of defects. IEEE Trans. Magn. 54, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2018.280967110.1109/tmag.2018.2809671 ↗
9. Sun, Y., Kang, Y.: Magnetic compression effect in present MFL testing sensor. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 160, 54 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2010.03.03810.1016/j.sna.2010.03.038 ↗
10. Sun, Y., Kang, Y.: Magnetic mechanisms of magnetic flux leakage nondestructive testing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.482855610.1063/1.4828556 ↗
11. Shcherbinin, V., Zatsepin, N.: Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. I. Field topography of defect models. Defectoscopy. 5, 385–393 (1966)
12. Hsu, S.-W.: Analysis of errors in obtaining magnetic dipoles based on magnetic field distribution. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 304, e228–e30 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.01.14710.1016/j.jmmm.2006.01.147 ↗
13. Suresh, V., Abudhair, A.: Dipole model to predict the rectangular defect on ferromagnetic pipe. J. Magn. 21, 437–441 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4283/jmag.2016.21.3.43710.4283/jmag.2016.21.3.437 ↗
14. Dutta, S.M., Ghorbel, F.H., Stanley, R.K.: Dipole modeling of magnetic flux leakage. IEEE Trans. Magn. 45, 1959–1965 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2008.201189510.1109/tmag.2008.2011895 ↗
15. Trevino, D.A.G., Dutta, S.M., Ghorbel, F.H., Karkoub, M.: An improved dipole model of 3-D magnetic flux leakage. IEEE Trans. Magn. 52, 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2015.247542910.1109/tmag.2015.2475429 ↗
16. Edwards, C., Palmer, S.B.: The magnetic leakage field of surface-breaking cracks. J. Phys. D. 19, 657–673 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/19/4/01810.1088/0022-3727/19/4/018 ↗
17. Shkatov, P.: Combining eddy-current and magnetic methods for the defectoscopy of ferromagnetic materials. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 28, 155–165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2012.71643610.1080/10589759.2012.716436 ↗
18. Deng, Z., Sun, Y., Kang, Y., Song, K., Wang, R.A.: Permeability-measuring: magnetic flux leakage method for inner surface crack in thick-walled steel pipe. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 36, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-017-0447-z10.1007/s10921-017-0447-z ↗
19. Song, K.: Study of signal mechanism based on combining magnetic flux leakage and eddy current testing. J. Mech. Eng. 45, 1 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2009.07.23310.3901/JME.2009.07.233 ↗
20. Atherton, D.L., Czura, W.: Finite element calculations on the effects of permeability variation on magnetic flux leakage signals. NDT E Int. 20, 239–241 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-9126(87)90248-310.1016/0308-9126(87)90248-3 ↗
21. Wang, R., Kang, Y., Tang, J., Feng, B., Deng, Y.: A novel magnetic flux leakage testing method based on AC and DC composite magnetization. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 39, 84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00730-010.1007/s10921-020-00730-0 ↗
22. Daniel, L.: An analytical model for the effect of multiaxial stress on the magnetic susceptibility of ferromagnetic materials. IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 2037–2040 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.223926410.1109/TMAG.2013.2239264 ↗