DataVXJournal of Nondestructive EvaluationPaper
journal article·2023-06

Defect Characterization Method for Bridge Cables Based on Topology of Dynamical Reconstruction of Magnetostrictive Guided Wave Testing Signals

Shuyu Duan, Xinjun Wu, Junjie Wang, Yiqing Zou, Lijun Jiang, Yaolin Wei

Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation· Volume 42· Issue 2
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Elliott, M.E., Heymsfield, E.: Inspection of Luling bridge cable stays: case study. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 129, 226–230 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2003)129:2(226)10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2003)129:2(226) ↗
2. Xu, J., Wu, X.J., Cheng, C., Ben, A.R.: A magnetic flux leakage and magnetostrictive guided wave hybrid transducer for detecting bridge cables. Sensors 12, 518–533 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/s12010051810.3390/s120100518 ↗
3. Christen, R., Bergamini, A., Motavalli, M.: Three-dimensional localization of defects in stay cables using magnetic flux leakage methods. J. Nondestr. Eval. 22, 93–101 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jone.0000010736.74285.b610.1023/b:jone.0000010736.74285.b6 ↗
4. Rizzo, P., di Scalea, F.L.: Acoustic emission monitoring of carbon-fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge stay cables in large-scale testing. Exp. Mech. 41, 282–290 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0232314610.1007/bf02323146 ↗
5. Zejli, H., Laksimi, A., Tessier, C., Gaillet, L., Benmedakhene, S.: Detection of the broken wires in the cables’ hidden parts (anchorings) by acoustic emission. Adv. Mater. Res. 13, 345–350 (2006). https://doi.org/10.4028/0-87849-420-0.34510.4028/0-87849-420-0.345 ↗
6. Mehrabi, A.B., Tabatabai, H.: Unified finite difference formulation for free vibration of cables. J. Struct. Eng. 124, 1313–1322 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1313)10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1313) ↗
7. Zhang, P.F., Tang, Z.F., Lv, F.Z., Yang, K.J.: Numerical and experimental investigation of guided wave propagation in a multi-wire cable. Appl. Sci. 9, 1028 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app905102810.3390/app9051028 ↗
8. Schaal, C., Bischoff, S., Gaul, L.: Damage detection in multi-wire cables using guided ultrasonic waves. Struct. Health Monit. Int. J. 15, 279–288 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/147592171664274710.1177/1475921716642747 ↗
9. Pavlakovic, B., Lowe, M., Cawley, P.: Guided ultrasonic waves for the inspection of post-tensioned bridges. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds.) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, pp. 1557–1564. Springer, Boston (1998)10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_202 ↗
10. Kwun, H., Teller, C.M.: Detection of fractured wires in steel cables using magnetorestrictive sensors. Mater. Eval. 52, 503–507 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2749/22213781581577579010.2749/222137815815775790 ↗
11. Rizzo, P., di Scalea, F.L.: Monitoring steel strands via ultrasonic measurements. In: Proceedings of the smart structures and materials 2002 conference, vol. 4696, pp. 62–73. San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.472578 (2002)10.1117/12.472578 ↗
12. Liu, Z.H., Zhao, J.C., Wu, B., Zhang, Y.N., He, C.F.: Configuration optimization of magnetostrictive transducers for longitudinal guided wave inspection in seven-wire steel strands. NDT E Int. 43, 484–492 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.003 ↗
13. Xu, J., Wu, X.J.: Nondestructive testing of bridge cables using magnetostrictive guided wave technique. Appl. Mech. Mater. 130, 2015–2018 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.130-134.201510.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.130-134.2015 ↗
14. Zhang, P.F., Tang, Z.F., Duan, Y.F., Yun, C.B., Lv, F.Z.: Ultrasonic guided wave approach incorporating SAFE for detecting wire breakage in bridge cable. Smart Struct. Syst. 22, 481–493 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.22.4.48110.12989/sss.2018.22.4.481 ↗
15. Rizzo, P., di Scalea, F.L.: Feature extraction for defect detection in strands by guided ultrasonic waves. Struct. Health Monit. 5, 297–308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/147592170606774210.1177/1475921706067742 ↗
16. Jiang, X., Xinjun, W., Liangyun, W., Chen, H., Kang, Y.H.: Detecting the flaws in prestressing strands using guided waves based on the magnetostrictive effect. Insight-Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit. 49, 647–650 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2007.49.11.64710.1784/insi.2007.49.11.647 ↗
17. Liu, Z.H., Zhang, Y.N., He, C.F., Wu, B.: Defect detection in helical and central wires of steel strands using advanced ultrasonic guided wave technique with new type magnetostrictive transducers. IEEE Ultrason. Symp. 2008, 832–835 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ultsym.2008.020010.1109/ultsym.2008.0200 ↗
18. Xu, J., Wu, X.J., Sun, P.F.: Detecting broken-wire flaws at multiple locations in the same wire of prestressing strands using guided waves. Ultrasonics 53, 150–156 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.05.00310.1016/j.ultras.2012.05.003 ↗
19. Rizzo, P., di Scalea, F.L.: Ultrasonic inspection of multi-wire steel strands with the aid of the wavelet transform. Smart Mater. Struct. 14, 685–695 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/14/4/02710.1088/0964-1726/14/4/027 ↗
20. Rizzo, P., di Scalea, F.L.: Wavelet-based feature extraction for automatic defect classification in strands by ultrasonic structural monitoring. Smart Struct. Syst. 2, 253–274 (2006). https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2006.2.3.25310.12989/sss.2006.2.3.253 ↗
21. Rizzo, P., Sorrivi, E., di Scalea, F.L., Viola, E.: Wavelet-based outlier analysis for guided wave structural monitoring: application to multi-wire strands. J. Sound Vib. 307, 52–68 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.06.05810.1016/j.jsv.2007.06.058 ↗
22. Tang, Z.F., Sui, X.D., Duan, Y.F., Zhang, P.F., Yun, C.B.: Guided wave-based cable damage detection using wave energy transmission and reflection. Struct. Control Health Monit. 28, e2688 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.268810.1002/stc.2688 ↗
23. Takens, F.: detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dyn. Syst. Turbul. (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb009192410.1007/bfb0091924 ↗
24. Garland, J., Bradley, E., Meiss, J.D.: Exploring the topology of dynamical reconstructions. Physica D 334, 49–59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2016.03.00610.1016/j.physd.2016.03.006 ↗
25. Edelsbrunner, L., Zomorodian: Topological persistence and simplification. Discret. Comput. Geom. 28, 511–533 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.2000.89213310.1109/sfcs.2000.892133 ↗
26. Edelsbrunner, H., Harer, J.: Persistent homology—a survey. Surveys on discrete and computational geometry, pp. 257–82. https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/453/08802 (2008)10.1090/conm/453/08802 ↗
27. Wasserman, L.: Topological data analysis. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 5, 501–532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-10004510.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100045 ↗
28. Bendich, P., Edelsbrunner, H., Kerber, M.: Computing robustness and persistence for images. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 16, 1251–1260 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2010.13910.1109/tvcg.2010.139 ↗
29. Horak, D., Maletić, S., Rajković, M.: Persistent homology of complex networks. J Stat Mech. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2009/03/p0303410.1088/1742-5468/2009/03/p03034 ↗
30. Liu, X.C., Xie, Z., Yi, D.Y.: A fast algorithm for constructing topological structure in large data. Homol. Homot. Appl. 14, 221–238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4310/hha.2012.v14.n1.a1110.4310/hha.2012.v14.n1.a11 ↗
31. Lum, P.Y., Singh, G., Lehman, A., Ishkanov, T., Vejdemo-Johansson, M., Alagappan, M., et al.: Extracting insights from the shape of complex data using topology. Sci. Rep. 3, 1–8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0123610.1038/srep01236 ↗
32. Umeda, Y.: Time series classification via topological data analysis. Inf. Media Technol. 12, 228–239 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.d-g7210.1527/tjsai.d-g72 ↗
33. Ghrist, R.: Barcodes: the persistent topology of data. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 45, 61–75 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1090/s0273-0979-07-01191-310.1090/s0273-0979-07-01191-3 ↗
34. Chang, Z.X., Mu, L., Wu, K.D., Opron, K., Xia, K.L., Wei, G.W.: A topological approach for protein classification. Comput. Math. Biophys. 3, 140–162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/mlbmb-2015-000910.1515/mlbmb-2015-0009 ↗
35. Pun, C.S., Xia, K., Lee, S.X.: Persistent-homology-based machine learning and its applications--a survey. arXiv:181100252v1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3275996 (2018)10.2139/ssrn.3275996 ↗
36. Duan, S.Y., Wu, X.J., Zou, Y.Q., Jiang, L.J.: Corrosion characterization of steel wires based on persistent homology theory for magnetostrictive guided wave testing signal. Struct. Health Monit. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921722111979010.1177/14759217221119790 ↗
37. Kennel, M.B., Brown, R., Abarbanel, H.D.: Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys. Rev. A 45, 3403 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.45.340310.1103/physreva.45.3403 ↗
38. Kantz, H., Schreiber, T.: Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
39. Fraser, A.M., Swinney, H.L.: Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys. Rev. A 33, 1134–1140 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.33.113410.1103/physreva.33.1134 ↗
40. Wu, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, W.W., Nie, Z.H., Lin, R., Ma, H.W.: Defect detection of pipes using Lyapunov dimension of Duffing oscillator based on ultrasonic guided waves. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 82, 130–147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.01210.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.012 ↗
41. Alleyne, D., Cawley, P.: A two-dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 1159–1168 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.40053010.1121/1.400530 ↗
42. Ervin, B.L., Bernhard, J.T., Kuchma, D.A., Reis, H.: Estimation of general corrosion damage to steel reinforced mortar using frequency sweeps of guided mechanical waves. Insight-Non-Dest. Test. Cond. Monit. 48, 682–692 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2006.48.11.68210.1784/insi.2006.48.11.682 ↗
43. Filip, S.I.: A robust and scalable implementation of the Parks-McClellan algorithm for designing FIR filters. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 43, 1–24 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/290490210.1145/2904902 ↗
44. Xu, J., Tang, H., Wu, X.J., Ben, A.R., Kang, Y.H.: Broken wire detection in stay cables based on guided waves. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, pp. 1207–1210. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/mace.2010.5536416 (2010)10.1109/mace.2010.5536416 ↗
45. Hu, C.Y., Xu, J.: Center frequency shift in pipe inspection using magnetostrictive guided waves. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 298, 111583 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.11158310.1016/j.sna.2019.111583 ↗
46. Adams, H., Tausz, A., Vejdemo-Johansson, M.: javaPlex: a research software package for persistent (Co)Homology, pp. 129–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44199-2_23 (2014)10.1007/978-3-662-44199-2_23 ↗
47. Liu, X.C., Wu, B., Qin, F., He, C.F., Han, Q.: Observation of ultrasonic guided wave propagation behaviours in pre-stressed multi-wire structures. Ultrasonics 73, 196–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.01410.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.014 ↗
48. Treyssède, F.: Investigation of the interwire energy transfer of elastic guided waves inside prestressed cables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 498–509 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.495508010.1121/1.4955080 ↗
49. Rizzo, P.: Ultrasonic wave propagation in progressively loaded multi-wire strands. Exp. Mech. 46, 297–306 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-006-7248-010.1007/s11340-006-7248-0 ↗