POD Evaluation: The Key Performance Indicator for NDE 4.0
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Vrana, J., Singh, R.: NDE 4.0—a design thinking perspective. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 40, 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00735-910.1007/s10921-020-00735-9 ↗
2. Kanzler, D., Rentala, V.K.: Reliability evaluation of testing systems and their connection to NDE 4.0. In: Meyendorf, N., Ida, N., Singh, R., Vrana, J. (eds.) Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation 4.0. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48200-8_3-110.1007/978-3-030-48200-8_3-1 ↗
3. Swets, J.A., Pickett, R.M.: Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems. Hrsg. von Academic Press. Academic Press. isbn: 0-12-679080-9 (1982)
4. Rummel, W.D., Todd Jr., P.H., Frecska, S.A., Rathke, R.A.: The detection of fatigue cracks by nondestructive testing methods (1974)
5. NDE 4.0 Webinar: Data: Perception vs. Reality with A. Anbarasu, T. Wenzel, R. Singh, J. Vrana. YouTube. 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpGoknrXmFs (2021)
6. IZFP Fraunhofer, Nondestructive Monitoring along the Product Life Cycle. https://www.izfp.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/izfp/en/documents/2016/Fraunhofer%20IZFP%20-%20General%20Overview.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2021
7. Vrana, J., Singh, R.: Cyber-physical loops as drivers of value creation in NDE 4.0. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 40, 61 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00793-710.1007/s10921-021-00793-7 ↗
8. Førli, O., Ronold, K.: Guidelines for NDE reliability determination and description. Nordtest NT TECHN report 394 (1998). http://nordtest.info/images/documents/nt-technical-reports/NT%20TR%20394_Guideline%20for%20NDE%20Reliability%20Determination%20and%20Description_Nordtest%20Technical%20Report.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021
9. Department of Defense, MIL-HDBK-1823: Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment. Handbook (1999)
10. Ripudaman Singh: Three Decades of NDI Reliability Assessment. Special review publication for USAF. Report No. Karta-3510-99-01, USAF Contract F41608-99-C-0404 (2000)
11. Department of Defense. MIL-HDBK-1823A: Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment. Handbook (2009)
12. Gandossi, L., Annis, Ch.: Probability of Detection Curves: Statistical Best-Practices. ENIQ report No 41. ENIQ. 24429 EN (2010)
13. ASTM E2862-12 (2012) Standard Practice for Probability of Detection Analysis for Hit/Miss Data. ASTM International.
14. ASTM E3023-15: Standard Practice for Probability of Detection Analysis for â Versus a Data. ASTM International (2015)
15. Kanzler, D., et al.: Die deutschen Bestrebungen zur Normierung der Fähigkeits- und uverlässigkeitsbewertung der zerstörungsfreien Prüfung. DGZfP-Jahrestagung 2021. ndt.net (2021). http://www.ndt.net/?id=26274
16. Müller, Ch., Bertovic, M., Holstein, R., Kanzler, D., Pitkänen, J., Ronneteg, U., Heckel, T.: A Plenary View on the Vigour of our NDE Reliability Models. 5th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE October 7–10, 2013, Berlin, Germany (2013)
17. Müller, C., Bertovic, M., Pavlovic, M., Kanzler, D., Ewert, U., Pitkänen, J., Ronneteg, U.: Paradigm shift in the holistic evaluation of the reliability of NDE systems. Mater. Test. 55(4), 261–269 (2013)10.3139/120.110433 ↗
18. Holstein, R., Müller, C.: Analyzing the Reliability of Non-destructive Tests Using the Modular Modell—A Practical Approach 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (2016)
19. Mueller, C., Fritz, T., Tillack, G.-R., Bellon, C., Scharmach, M.: (2001) Theory and Application of the Modular Approach to NDE Reliability Bridging the Gap Between Safety Requirements and Economy, NDT.net, Vol. 06 No. 09.
20. Spencer, Floyd W. (2011) Nonparametric POD estimation for hit/miss data: a goodness of fit comparison for parametric models. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1335. No. 1. American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.3592115 ↗
21. D. Kanzler, C Müller, J Pitkänen. (2013) Probability of defect detection of Posiva’s electron beam weld. WR 2013–70. Working Report. Posiva Oy.
22. Pavlović, M., Takahashi, K., Müller, C.: Probability of detection as a function of multiple influencing parameters. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring 54(11), 606–611 (2012)10.1784/insi.2012.54.11.606 ↗
23. Spies, M., Rieder, H.: An approach to the question ‘How to account for human error in MAPOD? In: 12th ECNDT Conference, (Gothenburg, Sweden, 2018) (2018). https://www.ndt.net/article/ecndt2018/papers/ecndt-0571-2018.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2021
24. Brewer, J., Mengert, P., DiSario, R.: Probability of visual crack detection from Japanese maintenance data. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, pp. 2029–2036. Springer, Boston (1997)10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_265 ↗
25. Berens, A.P.: NDE reliability data analysis: nondestructive evaluation and quality control. In: Metals Handbook. 9./17, pp. 689–701. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International (1989)
26. Völker, C., Shokouhi, P.: Clustering based multi sensor data fusion for honeycomb detection in concrete. J. Nondestr. Eval. 34(4), 1–10 (2015)10.1007/s10921-015-0307-7 ↗
27. Kim, F.H., et al.: The influence of X-Ray computed tomography acquisition parameters on image quality and probability of detection of additive manufacturing defects. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 141(11), 111002 (2019)10.1115/1.4044515 ↗
28. Kanzler, D., Müller, C., Pitkänen, J.: Probability of defect detection of Posiva's electron beam weld. No. POSIVA-WR—13-70. Posiva Oy (2013)
29. Bismut, E., Straub, D.: A unified model of inspection and monitoring quality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12853 (2021)
30. Kanzler, D., Müller, C., Pitkänen, J. et al.: Use of Bayesian Statistics in Determining the Reliability of Non-destructive Testing Systems. In: Materials Testing 55.4, pp. 254–260 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3139/120.11043210.3139/120.110432 ↗
31. Ramos, L., Mirando, T., Mishra, M., Fernandes, F., Manning, E.: A Bayesian approach for NDT data fusion: the Saint Torcato Church Case Study. Eng Struct. 84(1), 120–129 (2015)10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.015 ↗
32. Rentala, V.K., Mylavarapu, P., Gautam, J.P.: Issues in estimating probability of detection of NDT techniques—a model assisted approach. Ultras 87, 59–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.01210.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.012 ↗
33. Virkkunen, I., Koskinen, T., Jessen-Juhler, O.: Virtual round robin—a new opportunity to study NDT reliability. Nuclear Eng Des. 380, 111297 (2021)10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111297 ↗
34. Nockemann, Ch., Tillack, G.R., Schnitger, D.: Statistical Assessment Within a Global Conception of Reliability of NDE. Non-Destructive Examination Practice and Results—State of the Art and PISC III Results (1994)
35. Northcutt, C., Athalye, A., Mueller, J.: Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarks. arXiv 2103.14749 (2021)
36. Müller, Ch., Scharmach, M., et al.: General principles of reliability assessment of nondestructive diagnostic systems and its applicability to the demining problem. NDT.net, vol. 8 no. 4 (2003)
37. Fuchs, P., Kröger, T., Dierig, T., Garbe, Ch.: Generating Meaningful Synthetic Ground Truth for Pore Detection in Cast Aluminum Parts. 9th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography, Padova, Italy (iCT 2019). http://www.ndt.net/?id=23730 (2019)10.58286/23730 ↗
38. Meeker, W.Q.: R.B.Thompson’s contribution to model assisted probability of detection. AIP Conf. Proc. 1430, 83–94 (2012)10.1063/1.4716215 ↗
39. Fuchs, P., Kröger, T., Garbe, C.: Defect detection in CT scans of cast aluminum parts: a machine vision perspective. Neurocomputing 453, 85–96 (2021)10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.094 ↗
40. Swets, J.A., Pickett, R.M.: Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory. Academic Press, San Diego (1982)
41. Everingham, M., Eslami, A., et al.: The pascal visual object classes challenge: a retrospective. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 111, 98–136 (2015)10.1007/s11263-014-0733-5 ↗
42. Cordts, M., Ramos, M., et al.: The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding. IEEE Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3213–3223 (2016)10.1109/CVPR.2016.350 ↗
43. Rentala, V.K., Mylavarapu, P., et al.: POD of NDT techniques using high temperature oxidized fatigue cracks in an aero engine alloy. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 40, 41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00769-710.1007/s10921-021-00769-7 ↗
44. Rummel Ward, D., Rathke Richard, A.: Flaw Detection Reliability Assessment and Analysis. DTIC Report-ADP000013 (1982)
45. Rentala, V.K., Mylavarapu, P., Gautam, J., Kumar, V.: Generation of POD curves in the absence of service-induced cracked components—an experimental approach. Insight 61, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2019.61.1.2810.1784/insi.2019.61.1.28 ↗
46. Rentala, V.K., Mylavarapu, P., Gautam, J.P., Gp Capt, B.V.N., Shiva, K.G., Kumar, V.: Physical manifestation of a90/95 in Remnant life revision studies of aero-engine components. Struct. Integr. Procedia 14, 597–604 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.05.07310.1016/j.prostr.2019.05.073 ↗
47. Rentala, V.K., Mylavarapu, P., Gautam, J.P., Kumar, V.: NDE Reliability Using Laboratory Induced Natural Fatigue Cracks. 7th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE 2017. e-Journal of NDT (ndt.net) (2017). http://www.ndt.net/article/reliability2017/papers/29.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021
48. Rentala, V.K., Mylavarapu, P, Gopinath, K., Gautam, J.P., Kumar, V.: Model Assisted Probability of Detection for Lognormally Distributed Defects. 8th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace 2016: e-Journal of NDT. http://www.ndt.net/?id=20615 (2016)
49. Kanzler, D., Müller, C., Pitkänen, J.: Probability of detection for surface breaking holes with low-frequency eddy current testing—a non-linear multiparametric approach. Insight 56(12), 664–668 (2014)10.1784/insi.2014.56.12.664 ↗
50. Forsyth, D.S., Fahr, A., Leemans, D.V., McRae, K.I., Kallsen, S., Nessa, C., Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E., Poore, L.: Development of POD from in-service NDI data. AIP Conf. Proc. 509, 2167–2174 (2000)10.1063/1.1291338 ↗