Revisiting Piezoelectric Sensor Calibration Methods Using Elastodynamic Body Waves
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The application of absolutely calibrated piezoelectric (PZT) sensors is increasingly used to help interpret the information carried by radiated elastic waves of laboratory/in situs acoustic emissions (AEs) in nondestructive evaluation. In this paper, we present the methodology based on the finite element method (FEM) to characterize PZT sensors. The FEM-based modelling tool is used to numerically compute the true Green’s function between a ball impact source and an array of PZT sensors to map active source to theoretical ground motion. Physical-based boundary conditions are adopted to better constrain the problem of body wave propagation, reflection and transmission in/on the elastic medium. The modelling methodology is first validated against the reference approach (generalized ray theory) and is then extended down to 1 kHz where body wave reflection and transmission along different types of boundaries are explored. We find the Green’s functions calculated using physical-based boundaries have distinct differences between commonly employed idealized boundary conditions, especially around the anti-resonant and resonant frequencies. Unlike traditional methods that use singular ball drops, we find that each ball drop is only partially reliable over specific frequency bands. We demonstrate, by adding spectral constraints, that the individual instrumental responses are accurately cropped and linked together over 1 kHz to 1 MHz after which they overlap with little amplitude shift. This study finds that ball impacts with a broad range of diameters as well as the corresponding valid frequency bandwidth, are necessary to characterize broadband PZT sensors from 1 kHz to 1 MHz.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Waves and Analysis · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Earthquake Detection and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Lockner, D.: The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 30(7), 883–899 (1993)10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B ↗
2. Grosse, C.U., Ohtsu, M.: Acoustic Emission Testing. Springer, Berlin (2008)10.1007/978-3-540-69972-9 ↗
3. Ishida, T., Labuz, J.F., Manthei, G., Meredith, P.G., Nasseri, M.H.B., Shin, K., Yokoyama, T., Zang, A.: ISRM suggested method for laboratory acoustic emission monitoring. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50(3), 665–674 (2017)10.1007/s00603-016-1165-z ↗
4. Sellers, E.J., Kataka, M.O., Linzer, L.M.: Source parameters of acoustic emission events and scaling with mining-induced seismicity. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 108(B9) (2003)10.1029/2001JB000670 ↗
5. Li, B.Q., Einstein, H.H.: Comparison of visual and acoustic emission observations in a four point bending experiment on Barre Granite. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50(9), 2277–2296 (2017)10.1007/s00603-017-1233-z ↗
6. Li, B.Q., Einstein, H.H.: Normalized radiated seismic energy from laboratory fracture experiments on Opalinus Clayshale and Barre Granite. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 125(3), e2019JB018,544 (2020)10.1029/2019JB018544 ↗
7. Goodfellow, S.D.: Quantitative Analysis of Acoustic Emission from Rock Fracture Experiments. PhD thesis, University of Toronto (Canada) (2015)
8. Marty, S., Passelègue, F.X., Aubry, J., Bhat, H.S., Schubnel, A., Madariaga, R.: Origin of high-frequency radiation during laboratory earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46(7), 3755–3763 (2019)10.1029/2018GL080519 ↗
9. Selvadurai, P.A.: Laboratory insight into seismic estimates of energy partitioning during dynamic rupture: an observable scaling breakdown. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 124, 11,350–11,379 (2019)10.1029/2018JB017194 ↗
10. Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Priolo, E., Rinaldi, A.P., Clinton, J.F., Stabile, T.A., Dost, B., Fernandez, M.G., Wiemer, S., Dahm, T.: Current challenges in monitoring, discrimination, and management of induced seismicity related to underground industrial activities: a European perspective. Rev. Geophys. 55(2), 310–340 (2017)10.1002/2016RG000542 ↗
11. Kwiatek, G., Plenkers, K., Dresen, G., Group, J.R.: Source parameters of picoseismicity recorded at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: implications for scaling relations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101(6), 2592–2608 (2011)10.1785/0120110094 ↗
12. Goodfellow, S.D., Young, R.P.: A laboratory acoustic emission experiment under in situ conditions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41(10), 3422–3430 (2014)10.1002/2014GL059965 ↗
13. Zang, A., Stephansson, O., Stenberg, L., Plenkers, K., Specht, S., Milkereit, C., Schill, E., Kwiatek, G., Dresen, G., Zimmermann, G., Dahm, T., Weber, M.: Hydraulic fracture monitoring in hard rock at 410 m depth with an advanced fluid-injection protocol and extensive sensor array. Geophys. J. Int. 208(2), 790–813 (2016)10.1093/gji/ggw430 ↗
14. Amann, F., Gischig, V., Evans, K., Doetsch, J., Jalali, R., Valley, B., Krietsch, H., Dutler, N., Villiger, L., Brixel, B., et al.: The seismo-hydromechanical behavior during deep geothermal reservoir stimulations: open questions tackled in a decameter-scale in situ stimulation experiment. Solid Earth 9(1), 115–137 (2018)10.5194/se-9-115-2018 ↗
15. Manthei, G., Plenkers, K.: Review on in situ acoustic emission monitoring in the context of structural health monitoring in mines. Appl. Sci. 8(9), 1595 (2018)10.3390/app8091595 ↗
16. Moradian, Z., Einstein, H.H., Ballivy, G.: Detection of cracking levels in brittle rocks by parametric analysis of the acoustic emission signals. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49(3), 785–800 (2016)10.1007/s00603-015-0775-1 ↗
17. Li, B.Q., da Silva, B.G., Einstein, H.: Laboratory hydraulic fracturing of granite: acoustic emission observations and interpretation. Eng. Fract. Mech. 209, 200–220 (2019)10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.01.034 ↗
18. Hsu, N.N., Simmons, J.A., Hardy, S.C.: Approach to acoustic emission signal analysis-theory and experiment. In: Proceedings of the ARPA/AFML Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE (1978)
19. Breckenridge, F.R.: Acoustic emission transducer calibration by means of the seismic surface pulse. J. Acoust. Emiss. 1, 87–94 (1982)
20. Griffin, J.: Traceability of acoustic emission measurements for a proposed calibration method–classification of characteristics and identification using signal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50–51, 757–783 (2015)10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.04.018 ↗
21. Johnson, L.R.: Green’s function for Lamb’s problem. Geophys. J. Int. 37(1), 99–131 (1974)10.1111/j.1365-246X.1974.tb02446.x ↗
22. Lamb, H.: On the propagation of tremors over the surface of an elastic solid. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 203(359–371), 1–42 (1904). Containing papers of a mathematical or physical character10.1098/rsta.1904.0013 ↗
23. Pao, Y., Gajewski, R.R.: The generalized ray theory and transient responses of layered elastic solids. Phys. Acoust. 13, 183–265 (1977)10.1016/B978-0-12-477913-6.50011-5 ↗
24. Hsu, N.N.: Dynamic Green’s functions of an infinite plate-A computer program. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Standards, Center for Manufacturing Engineering, Gaithersburg (1985)10.6028/NBS.IR.85-3234 ↗
25. McLaskey, G.C., Glaser, S.D.: Acoustic emission sensor calibration for absolute source measurements. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 31(2), 157–168 (2012)10.1007/s10921-012-0131-2 ↗
26. Leser, W.P., Yuan, F., Newman, J.A.: Band-limited Green’s functions for the quantitative evaluation of acoustic emission using the finite element method. In: 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, p. 1655 (2013)10.2514/6.2013-1655 ↗
27. Ye, R., de Hoop, M.V., Petrovitch, C.L., Pyrak-Nolte, L.J., Wilcox, L.C.: A discontinuous Galerkin method with a modified penalty flux for the propagation and scattering of acousto-elastic waves. Geophys. J. Int. 205(2), 1267–1289 (2016)10.1093/gji/ggw070 ↗
28. Sause, M.G., Hamstad, M.A.: Numerical modeling of existing acoustic emission sensor absolute calibration approaches. Sens. Actuat. A: Phys. 269, 294–307 (2018)10.1016/j.sna.2017.11.057 ↗
29. Schnabel, S., Marklund, P., Larsson, R.: Elastic waves of a single elasto-hydrodynamically lubricated contact. Tribol. Lett. 65(1), 5 (2016)10.1007/s11249-016-0785-5 ↗
30. Schnabel, S., Golling, S., Marklund, P., Larsson, R.: Absolute measurement of elastic waves excited by Hertzian contacts in boundary restricted systems. Tribol. Lett. 65(1), 1–11 (2017)10.1007/s11249-016-0787-3 ↗
31. Wu, B.S., McLaskey, G.C.: Broadband calibration of acoustic emission and ultrasonic sensors from generalized ray theory and finite element models. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 37(1), 8 (2018)10.1007/s10921-018-0462-8 ↗
32. Aki, K., Richards, P.G.: Quantitative Seismology. University Science Books, Sausalito (2002)
33. Bertschi, R.: AE-Amp Manual EN. Tech. rep. (2018) https://www.elsys-instruments.com/en/products/ae-amp-preamplifier.php
34. Reed, J.: Energy losses due to elastic wave propagation during an elastic impact. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 18(12), 2329–2337 (1985)10.1088/0022-3727/18/12/004 ↗
35. Breckenridge, F., Proctor, T., Hsu, N., Fick, S., Eitzen, D.: Transient sources for acoustic emission work. In: Yamaguchi, K., Takakashi, H., Niitsuma, H. (eds.) Progress in Acoustic Emission, Japanese Society for Non-destructive Inspection, Tokyo, pp. 20–37 (1990)
36. Manthei, G.: Characterization of acoustic emission sources in a rock salt specimen under triaxial compression. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95(5), 1674–1700 (2005)10.1785/0120040076 ↗
37. Kwiatek, G., Charalampidou, E.M., Dresen, G., Stanchits, S.: An improved method for seismic moment tensor inversion of acoustic emissions through assessment of sensor coupling and sensitivity to incidence angle. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 65, 153–161 (2014)10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.11.005 ↗
38. Glaser, S.D., Weiss, G.G., Johnson, L.R.: Body waves recorded inside an elastic half-space by an embedded, wideband velocity sensor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104(3), 1404–1412 (1998)10.1121/1.424350 ↗
39. Ono, K.: Rayleigh wave calibration of acoustic emission sensors and ultrasonic transducers. Sensors 19(14), 3129 (2019)10.3390/s19143129 ↗
40. Bracewell, R.N.: The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, vol. 31999. McGraw-Hill, New York (1986)
41. COMSOL AB: COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.5 (2019). www.comsol.com
42. Cohen, M., Jennings, P.C.: Silent boundary methods for transient analysis. In: Belytschko, T., Hughes, T. (eds.) Computational Methods for Transient Analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1983)
43. Gasch, T., Malm, R., Ansell, A.: A coupled hygro-thermo-mechanical model for concrete subjected to variable environmental conditions. Int. J. Solids Struct. 91, 143–156 (2016)10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.03.004 ↗
44. Selvadurai, A.P.S., Najari, M.: On the interpretation of hydraulic pulse tests on rock specimens. Adv. Water Resour. 53, 139–149 (2013)10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.11.008 ↗
45. Selvadurai, A.P.S., Najari, M.: The thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior of the argillaceous Cobourg Limestone. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 122(6), 4157–4171 (2017)10.1002/2016JB013744 ↗
46. Jacquey, A.B., Cacace, M.: Multiphysics modeling of a Brittle-Ductile lithosphere: 1. Explicit Visco-Elasto-Plastic formulation and its numerical implementation. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 125(1), e2019JB018,474 (2020)10.1029/2019JB018474 ↗
47. McLaskey, G.C., Lockner, D.A., Kilgore, B.D., Beeler, N.M.: A robust calibration technique for acoustic emission systems based on momentum transfer from a ball drop. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 105(1), 257–271 (2015)10.1785/0120140170 ↗
48. Kwiatek, G., Ben-Zion, Y.: Assessment of P and S wave energy radiated from very small shear-tensile seismic events in a deep South African mine. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 118(7), 3630–3641 (2013)10.1002/jgrb.50274 ↗
49. Villiger, L., Gischig, V.S., Doetsch, J., Krietsch, H., Dutler, N.O., Jalali, M., Valley, B., Selvadurai, P.A., Mignan, A., Plenkers, K., Giardini, D., Amann, F., Wiemer, S.: Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock. Solid Earth 11(2), 627–655 (2020)10.5194/se-11-627-2020 ↗
50. Ono, K.: Frequency dependence of receiving sensitivity of ultrasonic transducers and acoustic emission sensors. Sensors 18(11), 1–30 (2018)10.3390/s18113861 ↗
51. ASTM International: ASTM E1106–07: Standard Test Method for Primary Calibration of Acoustic Emission Sensors. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (2017)
52. Tang, X.M., Zhu, Z., Toksoz, M.N.: Radiation patterns of compressional and shear transducers at the surface of an elastic half-space. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95(1), 71–76 (1994). doi: 10.1121/1.40829910.1121/1.408299 ↗
53. Gu, C., Mok, U., Marzouk, Y.M., Prieto, G.A., Sheibani, F., Evans, J.B., Hager, B.H.: Bayesian waveform-based calibration of high-pressure acoustic emission systems with ball drop measurements. Geophys. J. Int. 221(1), 20–36 (2020)10.1093/gji/ggz568 ↗
54. Askey, R.A., Roy, R.: Gamma function. In: NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Chap. 5, pp. 135–147. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
55. Proctor, T.M.: An improved piezoelectric acoustic emission transducer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71(5), 1163–1168 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.38776310.1121/1.387763 ↗
56. Fortunko, C.M., Hamstad, M.A., Fitting, D.W.: High-fidelity acoustic-emission sensor/preamplifier subsystems: modeling and experiments. In: IEEE 1992 Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, pp. 327–332 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1992.27594210.1109/ULTSYM.1992.275942 ↗
57. Eitzen, D.G., Wadley, H.N.G.: Acoustic emission: establishing the fundamentals. J. Res. Natl. Bureau Stand. 89(1), 75–100 (1984)10.6028/jres.089.008 ↗
58. Hanks, T.C.: b values and $$\omega $$-$$\gamma $$ seismic source models: implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high-frequency strong ground motion. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 84(B5), 2235–2242 (1979)10.1029/JB084iB05p02235 ↗
59. Li, B.Q.: Microseismic and Real-time Imaging of Fractures and Microfractures in Barre Granite and Opalinus Clayshale. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2019)10.1029/2019JB018376 ↗