Remaining Useful Life Estimation with Lamb-Wave Sensors Based on Wiener Process and Principal Components Regression
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes a new approach for predicting the remaining useful life of a structure from Lamb wave sensor data using principal component regression and Wiener process degradation modeling. Principal component regression is used for extracting damage sensitive features of a Lamb wave sensor signal and establish a relation between the features and measured areas. A Wiener process is developed to model the random delamination growth and predict future damage and failure time probability. We use minimum squared prediction error to find the optimum number of features and the window inside a Lamb wave signal that is most sensitive to the fatigue damage. Method is illustrated on real sensor data collected under run-to-failure fatigue loading conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Raghavan, A., Cesnik, C.E.: Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring. Shock Vib. Dig. 39(2), 91–116 (2007)10.1177/0583102406075428 ↗
2. Farrar, C.R., Lieven, N.A.: Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 365(1851), 623–632 (2007)10.1098/rsta.2006.1927 ↗
3. Giurgiutiu, V.: Tuned lamb wave excitation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 16(4), 291–305 (2005)10.1177/1045389X05050106 ↗
4. Giurgiutiu, V., Cuc, A.: Embedded non-destructive evaluation for structural health monitoring, damage detection, and failure prevention. Shock Vib. Dig. 37(2), 83–105 (2005)10.1177/0583102405052561 ↗
5. Diamanti, K., Hodgkinson, J., Soutis, C.: Application of a lamb wave technique for the non-destructive inspection of composite structures (2004)
6. Kessler, S.S., Spearing, S.M., Soutis, C.: Damage detection in composite materials using lamb wave methods. Smart Mater. Struct. 11(2), 269 (2002)10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 ↗
7. Ihn, J.B., Chang, F.K.: Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. diagnostics. Smart Mater. Struct. 13(3), 609 (2004)10.1088/0964-1726/13/3/020 ↗
8. Mujica, L.E., Vehi, J., Ruiz, M., Verleysen, M., Staszewski, W., Worden, K.: Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment. Mech. Syst. Sign. Proces. 22(1), 155–171 (2008)10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.05.001 ↗
9. Pullin, R., Eaton, M.J., Hensman, J.J., Holford, K.M., Worden, K., Evans, S.L.: A principal component analysis of acoustic emission signals from a landing gear component. Appl. Mech. Mater. 13, 41–47 (2008)10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.13-14.41 ↗
10. Yan, A., Kerschen, G., De Boe, P., Golinval, J.: Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions. part i: a linear analysis. Mech. Syst. Sign. Proces. 19(4), 847–864 (2005)10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.12.002 ↗
11. De Boe, P., Golinval, J.C.: Principal component analysis of a piezosensor array for damage localization. Struct. Health Monit. 2(2), 137–144 (2003)10.1177/1475921703002002005 ↗
12. Kessler, S.S., Agrawal, P.: Application of pattern recognition for damage classification in composite laminates. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University (2007)10.2514/6.2007-2411 ↗
13. Pavlopoulou, S., Worden, K., Soutis, C.: Structural health monitoring and damage prognosis in composite repaired structures through the excitation of guided ultrasonic waves. In: Conference on Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, ser. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8695 (2013)10.1117/12.2009346 ↗
14. Lu, Y., Wang, X., Tang, J., Ding, Y.: Damage detection using piezoelectric transducers and the lamb wave approach: Ii. robust and quantitative decision making. Smart Mater. Struct. 17(2), 025034 (2008)10.1088/0964-1726/17/2/025034 ↗
15. Cross, E.J., Manson, G., Worden, K., Pierce, S.G.: Features for damage detection with insensitivity to environmental and operational variations. Proc. R. Soc. A 468(2148), 4098–4122 (2012)10.1098/rspa.2012.0031 ↗
16. Christer, A.H., Wang, W.: A model of condition monitoring of a production plant. Int. J. Prod. Res. 30(9), 2199–2211 (1992)10.1080/00207549208948145 ↗
17. Nelson, W.: Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Tests Plans, and Data Analyses. Wiley, New York (1990)10.1002/9780470316795 ↗
18. Lu, C.J., Meeker, W.Q.: Using degradation measures to estimate a time-to-failure distribution. Technometrics 35(2), 161–174 (1993)10.1080/00401706.1993.10485038 ↗
19. Gebraeel, N.Z., Lawley, M.A., Li, R., Ryan, J.K.: Residual life distributions from component degradation signals: a bayesian approach. IIE Trans. 37, 543–557 (2005)10.1080/07408170590929018 ↗
20. Whitmore, G.A., Schenkelberg, F.: Modelling accelerated degradation data using wiener diffusion with a time scale transformation. Lifetime Data Anal. 3(1), 27–45 (1997)10.1023/A:1009664101413 ↗
21. Robinson, M.E., Crowder, M.J.: Bayesian methods for a growth-curve degradation model with repeated measures. Lifetime Data Anal. 6(4), 357–374 (2000)10.1023/A:1026509432144 ↗
22. Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Larossa, C.C., Janapati, V., Roy, S., Chang, F.K.: Accelerated aging experiments for prognostic of damage growth in composite materials. In: Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 1 (2011)
23. A. D3479/D3479M-12, Standard Test Method for Tension-Tension Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, ASTM Std. (2012)
24. A. D3039 / D3039M–14, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, ASTM Std. (2014)
25. Jackson, J.E.: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. A user’s guide to principal components, ser. Wiley, Hoboken (1991)10.1002/0471725331 ↗
26. Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., Vining, G.G.: Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. Wiley, New York (2006)
27. Geladi, P.: Chemometrics in spectroscopy. part 1. Classical chemometrics. Spectrochim. Acta B 58(5), 767–782 (2003)10.1016/S0584-8547(03)00037-5 ↗
28. Frank, L.L.E., Friedman, J.H.: A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools. Technometrics 35(2), 109–135 (1993)10.1080/00401706.1993.10485033 ↗
29. Folks, J.L., Chhikara, R.S.: he inverse gaussian distribution and its statistical application-a review. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 40, 263–289 (1978)10.1111/j.2517-6161.1978.tb01039.x ↗
30. Whitmore, G.A., Crowder, M.J., Lawless, J.: Failure inference from a marker process based on a bivariate wiener model. Lifetime Data Anal. 4(3), 229–251 (1998)10.1023/A:1009617814586 ↗