journal article·2021-09Open access

Rail Surface Defect Detection and Analysis Using Multi-Channel Eddy Current Method Based Algorithm for Defect Evaluation

Jeong Won Park, Taek Gyu Lee, In Chul Back, Sang Jun Park, Jong Min Seo, Won Jae Choi, Se Gon Kwon

Abstract

Abstract The railroad rail support trains and contributes to their operation. Internal and surface defects occur on the rail due to various combinations of causes including fatigue loading and cyclic tension and compression among others from the deterioration of the rail along with the temperature differences of seasonal changes. Surface defects such as head check, shelling, and squats start out in the rail head and become internal defects due to poor maintenance, ultimately resulting in rail failure. In order to prevent rail failure, it is important that defects are identified through nondestructive evaluation (NDE) in advance and to carry out maintenance techniques including grinding. NDE methods include MFL, EMAT, and ECT, and among these, the ECT method is a representative method with excellent detection sensitivity that nondestructively inspects metal surfaces such as rails and pipes using an electromagnetic field. Also, since the defect signal is obtained as an electrical signal, the depth, length, and width of defects can be assessed using a defect evaluation algorithm. This study investigated the field applicability and future practical use of the 16 channel eddy current testing equipment and defect evaluation algorithm developed in this study. Therefore, the field applicability of the equipment and defect evaluation algorithm was investigated through the detection of artificial defects with varying size and depth. Afterwards, future practical use was evaluated by inspection of areas of rail that are in use and with naturally occurring surface defects and analysis of their size (length, width), depth, and phenomena.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. KRRI: Construction Rule and Regulation on Korean Railroad’ Report. KRRI, Uiwang-Si (2017)
2. Han, S.W., Cho, S.H.: Review of non-destructive evaluation technologies for rail inspection. J. Korean Soc. Nondestruct. Test. 31(4), 398–413 (2011)
3. Papaelias, M.P., Roberts, C., Davis, C.L.: A review on non-destructive evaluation of rails: State-of-the-art and fu-ture development. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 222(4), 367–384 (2008)10.1243/09544097JRRT209 ↗
4. Kabir, S., Alsulami, B.: Assessment and monitoring for railway tracks reliability and safety using nondestructive testing measurement systems. Int. J. Railw. Res. 2, 24–32 (2015)
5. Kishore, M.B., Park, J.W., Song, S.J., Kim, H.J., Kwon, S.G.: Characterization of defects on rail surface using eddy current technique. JMST 33(9), 4209–4215 (2019)
6. Cannon, D.F., Edel, K.O., Grassie, S.L., Sawley, K.: Rail defects: an overview. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 26(10), 865–886 (2003)10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00693.x ↗
7. NSW Transport RailCorp: Rail Defects Handbook: TMC 226, pp. 1–83. NSW Transport RailCorp, Sydney (2012)
8. Deutschl, E., et al.: Defect detection on rail surfaces by a vi-sion based system. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 507–511. IEEE, Parma (2004)
9. Szugs, T. et al.: Combination of ultrasonic and eddy current testing with imaging for characterization of rolling con-tact fatigue. In: 19th World Conference on Non Destructive Testing, pp. 1–8 (2016)
10. Dey, A., Kurz, J., Tenczynski, L.: Detection and evaluation of rail defects with non- destructive testing methods. In: 19th World Conference on Non Destructive Testing, pp. 1–9 (2016)
11. Park, J.W., Park, J.H., Song, S.J., Kishore, M.B., Kwon, S.G., Kim, H.J.: Enhanced detection of defects using GMR sensor based remote field eddy current technique. J. Magnet. 22(4), 531–538 (2017)10.4283/JMAG.2017.22.4.531 ↗
12. Park, J.W., Park, J.H., Song, S.J., Kim, H.J., Kwon, S.G.: GMR sensor applicability to remote field eddy current defect signal detection in a ferromagnetic pipe. J. Korean Soc. Nondestruct. Test. 36(6), 483–489 (2016)10.7779/JKSNT.2016.36.6.483 ↗
13. Garcia-Martin, J., Gomez-Gil, J., Vazquez-Sanchez, E.: Non-destructive techniques based on eddy current testing. Sensors 11(3), 2525–2565 (2011)10.3390/s110302525 ↗
14. Lee, T.G., Yeom, Y.T., Kim, H.J., Song, S.J., Kwon, S.G., Kwon, S.D.: Analysis of eddy current signal of defects on railway. Korean Phys. Soc. 69(4), 361–368 (2019)
15. Lee, H.-J., Kim, Y.-S., Nam, M.-W., Yoon, B.-S., Kim, S.-K.: Eddy current testing of weldment by plus (+) point probe. J. Korean Soc. Nondestruct. Test. 19(6), 426–432 (1999)
16. Sabbagh, H.A., Sabbagh, E.H., Kim Murphy, R.: Recent advances in modeling eddy-current probes. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, College Park (2002)
17. Dwyer-Joyce, R.S., Lewis, R., Gao, N., Grieve, D.G.: Wear and fatigue of railway track caused by contamination, sanding and surface damage. In: 6th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Sheel systems, pp. 211–220 (2003)