Application of Noise Cancelling and Damage Detection Algorithms in NDE of Concrete Bridge Decks Using Impact Signals
Source abstract
Abstract
Delamination is a commonly observed distress in concrete bridge decks. Among all the delamination detection methods, acoustic methods have the advantages of being fast and inexpensive. In traditional acoustic inspection methods, the inspector drags a chain alone or hammers on the bridge deck and detects delamination from the “hollowness” of the sound. The signals are often contaminated by ambient traffic noise and the detection of delamination is highly subjective. This paper describes the performance of an impact-based acoustic NDE method where the traffic noise was filtered by employing a noise cancelling algorithm and where subjectivity was eliminated by introducing feature extraction and pattern recognition algorithms. Different algorithms were compared and the best one was selected in each category. The comparison showed that the modified independent component analysis (ICA) algorithm was most effective in cancelling the traffic noise and features consisting of mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) had the best performance in terms of repeatability and separability. The condition of the bridge deck was then detected by a radial basis function (RBF) neural network. The performance of the system was evaluated using both experimental and field data. The results show that the selected algorithms increase the noise robustness of acoustic methods and perform satisfactorily if the training data is representative.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Blind Source Separation Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson, A., Popovics, J.S.: Lamb wave basis for impact-echo method analysis. J. Eng. Mech. 131, 438 (2005)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:4(438) ↗
2. Sansalone, M.: Impact-echo: the complete story. ACI Struct. J. 94(6), 777–786 (1997)
3. Martin, J., et al.: Ultrasonic tomography of grouted duct post-tensioned reinforced concrete bridge beams. NDT E Int. 34(2), 107–113 (2001)10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00035-9 ↗
4. Shevaldykin, V., Samokrutov, A., Kozlov, V.: Ultrasonic low frequency short-pulse transducers with dry point contact. In: Proceedings of Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE), vol. 16, p. 9 (2003)
5. Bungey, J.H.: Sub-surface radar testing of concrete: a review. Constr. Build. Mater. 18(1), 1–8 (2004)10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00093-X ↗
6. Brink, A., et al.: Application of quantitative impulse thermography for structural evaluation in civil engineering—comparison of experimental results and numerical simulations. In: Quantitative Infrared Thermography, Croatia (2002)
7. Clemena, G.G., McKeel, W.T.: Detection of delamination in bridge decks with infrared thermography. Transp. Res. Rec. 664, 180–182 (1978)
8. Malhotra, V.M., Carino, N.J.: Handbook on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1991)
9. ASTM: Standard Practice for Measuring Delaminations in Concrete Bridge Decks by Sounding. ASTM-D4580. ASTM International, West Conshohocker (2003)
10. Henderson, M.E., Dion, G.N., Costley, R.D.: Acoustic inspection of concrete bridge decks. In: Proc. SPIE, Newport Beach, CA (1999)
11. MDOT: Instruction manual for bridge deck delamination detector. Michigan Department of Transportation: Lansing, MI (1977)
12. Rolander, D.D., et al.: Highway bridge inspection: state-of-the-practice survey. J. Transp. Res. Board 1749, 73–81 (2001)10.3141/1749-12 ↗
13. Boll, S.: Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 27(2), 113–120 (1979)10.1109/TASSP.1979.1163209 ↗
14. Comon, P.: Independent component analysis: a new concept? Signal Process. 36, 287–314 (1994)10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 ↗
15. Koldovsky, Z., Tichavsky, P., Oja, E.: Efficient variant of algorithm FastICA for independent component analysis attaining the Cramér-Rao lower bound. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 17(5), 1265–1277 (2006)10.1109/TNN.2006.875991 ↗
16. Widrow, B., Hoff, M.: Adaptive switching circuits. IRE WESCON Convention Record, 96–104, 196010.21236/AD0241531 ↗
17. Vincent, E., Gribonval, R., Fevotte, C.: Performance measurement in blind audio source separation. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14(4), 1462–1469 (2006)10.1109/TSA.2005.858005 ↗
18. Zheng, F., Zhang, G., Song, Z.: Comparison of different implementations of MFCC. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 16(6), 582–589 (2001)10.1007/BF02943243 ↗
19. Lee, S.M., et al.: Improved MFCC feature extraction by PCA-optimized filter bank for speech recognition. In: IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, pp. 49–52 (2001)
20. Haykin, S.: Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)
21. Kay, S.M.: Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume II: Detection Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)
22. Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K.: Pattern Recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego (2003)
23. Zhang, G.: Automatic Delamination Detection of Concrete Bridge Decks using Acoustic Signatures. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Michigan State University, East Lansing (2010)