Sparse Deconvolution Methods for Ultrasonic NDT
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work we present two sparse deconvolution methods for nondestructive testing. The first method is a special matching pursuit (MP) algorithm in order to deconvolve the mixed data (signal and noise), and thus to remove the unwanted noise. The second method is based on the approximate Prony method (APM). Both methods employ the sparsity assumption about the measured ultrasonic signal as prior knowledge. The MP algorithm is used to derive a sparse representation of the measured data by a deconvolution and subtraction scheme. An orthogonal variant of the algorithm (OMP) is presented as well. The APM technique also relies on the assumption that the desired signals are sparse linear combinations of (reflections of) the transmitted pulse. For blind deconvolution, where the transducer impulse response is unknown, we offer a general Gaussian echo model whose parameters can be iteratively adjusted to the real measurements. Several test results show that the methods work well even for high noise levels. Further, an outlook for possible applications of these deconvolution methods is given.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Blind Source Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Demirli, S., Saniie, J.: Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part I: analysis and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 48(3), 787–802 (2001)10.1109/58.920713 ↗
2. Kaaresen, K.F., Bolviken, E.: Blind deconvolution of ultrasonic traces accounting for pulse variance. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 46(3), 564–573 (1999)10.1109/58.764843 ↗
3. Mendel, J.M.: Optimal Seismic Deconvolution: An Estimation-Based Approach. Academic Press, New York (1983)
4. Walden, A.T.: Non-Gaussian reflectivity, entropy, and deconvolution. Geophysics 50(12), 2862–2888 (1985)10.1190/1.1441905 ↗
5. Ciang, H.-H., Nikias, C.L.: Adaptive deconvolution and identification of nonminimum phase FIR systems based on cumulants. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 35(1), 36–47 (1990)10.1109/9.45141 ↗
6. Nandi, A.K., Mämpel, D., Roscher, B.: Comparative study of deconvolution algorithms with applications in non-destructive testing. IEE Dig. 145, 1/1–1/6 (1995)
7. Neelamani, R., Choi, H., Baraniuk, R.: ForWaRD: Fourier-wavelet regularized deconvolution for ill-conditioned systems. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 52(2), 418–432 (2004)
8. Herrera, R.H., Orozco, R., Rodriguez, M.: Wavelet-based deconvolution of ultrasonic signals in nondestructive evaluation. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 7(10), 1748–1756 (2006)10.1631/jzus.2006.A1748 ↗
9. Olofsson, T.: Computationally efficient sparse deconvolution of B-scan images. In: Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp., pp. 540–543 (2005)
10. Olofsson, T., Wennerström, E.: Sparse deconvolution of B-Scan images. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 54(8), 1634–1641 (2007)10.1109/TUFFC.2007.434 ↗
11. Demirli, S., Saniie, J.: Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part II: nondestructive evaluation applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 48(3), 803–811 (2001)10.1109/58.920714 ↗
12. Ziskind, I., Wax, M.: Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 36(10), 1553–1560 (1988)10.1109/29.7543 ↗
13. Wu, C.F.J.: On the convergence properties of the EM algorithm. Ann. Stat. 11(1), 95–103 (1983)10.1214/aos/1176346060 ↗
14. Chung, P.J., Böhme, J.F.: Comparative convergence analysis of EM and SAGE algorithms in DOA estimation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49(12), 2940–2949 (2001)10.1109/78.969503 ↗
15. Mallat, S., Zhang, Z.: Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41, 3397–3415 (1993)10.1109/78.258082 ↗
16. Tropp, J.: Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 50, 2231–2242 (2004)10.1109/TIT.2004.834793 ↗
17. Peter, T., Potts, D., Tasche, M.: Nonlinear approximation by sums of exponentials and translates. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33(4), 1920–1944 (2011)10.1137/100790094 ↗
18. Ruiz-Reyes, N., Vera-Candeas, P., Curpián-Alonso, J., Mata-Campos, R., Cuevas-Martinez, J.C.: New matching pursuit-based algorithm for SNR improvement in ultrasonic NDT. NDT E Int. 38, 453–458 (2005)10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.12.001 ↗
19. Ruiz-Reyes, N., Vera-Candeas, P., Curpián-Alonso, J., Cuevas-Martinez, J.C., Blanco-Claraco, J.L.: High-resolution pursuit for detecting flaw echoes close to the material surface in ultrasonic NDT. NDT E Int. 39, 487–492 (2006)10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.02.002 ↗
20. Mor, E., Azoulay, A., Mayer, A.: A matching pursuit method for approximate overlapping ultrasonic echoes. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57(7), 1996–2004 (2010)10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1647 ↗
21. Boßmann, F.: Entwicklung einer automatisierten Auswertung von bildgebenden Ultraschallverfahren. Diploma thesis, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany (2009)