The Use of Ultrasonic Arrays to Characterize Crack-Like Defects
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of ultrasonic arrays to image and size crack-like defects is an important area in non-destructive evaluation. In this paper, two approaches are considered for extracting the key parameters of crack length and orientation angle. The parameters for small cracks are inferred from the scattering matrix. For larger cracks, the parameters are extracted directly from a high resolution image. The performance of both techniques is first assessed using a hybrid model to generate the full matrix of array data for a specified inspection configuration. The model combines a ray-based propagation model with scattering matrices to describe wave interaction with a defect. Good agreement is achieved between simulated and experimental results, hence validating this model-based approach. This model is then used to assess the impact of time-domain noise on the characterisation of crack-like defects. For the low-noise case, the scattering matrix approach shows good performance if the crack length is greater than 0.2 wavelengths and the image-based approach is good for crack lengths greater than 0.5 wavelengths. The scattering-matrix-based approach is found to be more sensitive to the addition of noise than the image-based approach. Finally, both techniques are demonstrated experimentally on samples containing more realistic defects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. William, C.D.: Materials Science and Engineering—An Introduction. Wiley, New York (1997)
2. Achenbach, J.D.: Quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37, 13–27 (2000)10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00074-8 ↗
3. Achenbach, J.D.: Measurement models for quantitative ultrasonics. J. Sound Vib. 159, 385–401 (1992)10.1016/0022-460X(92)90749-N ↗
4. Chapman, R.K.: A system model for the ultrasonic inspection of smooth planar cracks J. Nondest. Eval. 9, 197–210 (1990)10.1007/BF00566394 ↗
5. Bostrom, A., Wirdelius, H.: Ultrasonic probe modeling and nondestructive crack detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 2836–2848 (1995)10.1121/1.411850 ↗
6. Bovik, P., Bostrom, A.: Model of ultrasonic nondestructive testing for internal and subsurface cracks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2723–2733 (1997)10.1121/1.420326 ↗
7. Drinkwater, B.W., Wilcox, P.D.: Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: a review. NDT & E Int. 39, 525–541 (2006)10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.006 ↗
8. Mahaut, S., Roy, O., Beroni, C., Rotter, B.: Development of phased array techniques to improve characterization of defect located in a component of complex geometry. Ultrasonics 40, 165–169 (2002)10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00131-2 ↗
9. Lozev, M.G., Spencer, R.L., Hodgkinson, D.: Optimized inspection of thin-walled pipe welds using advanced ultrasonic techniques J. Press. Vessel Technol.-Trans. ASME 127, 237–243 (2005)10.1115/1.1991876 ↗
10. Komura, I., Hirasawa, T., Nagai, S., Takabayashi, J., Naruse, K.: Crack detection and sizing technique by ultrasonic and electromagnetic methods. Nucl. Eng. Des. 206, 351–362 (2001)10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00421-0 ↗
11. Seydel, J.: Ultrasonic Synthetic-Aperture Focusing Techniques in NDT. Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing, vol. 6. Academic Press, New York (1982)
12. Portzgen, N., Gisolf, D., Blacquiere, G.: Inverse wave field extrapolation: a different NDI approach to imaging defects IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 54, 118–127 (2007)10.1109/TUFFC.2007.217 ↗
13. Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B.W., Wilcox, P.D.: Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation. NDT & E Int. 38, 701–711 (2005)10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002 ↗
14. Hunter, A.J., Drinkwater, B.W., Wilcox, P.D.: The wavenumber algorithm for full-matrix imaging using an ultrasonic array. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 55, 2450–2462 (2008)10.1109/TUFFC.952 ↗
15. Velichko, A., Wilcox, P.D.: An analytical comparison of ultrasonic array imaging algorithms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2377–2384 (2010)10.1121/1.3308470 ↗
16. Wilcox, P.D., Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B.W.: Advanced reflector characterization with ultrasonic phased arrays in NDE applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 54, 1541–1550 (2007)10.1109/TUFFC.2007.424 ↗
17. Zhang, J., Drinkwater, B., Wilcox, P.: Defect characterization using an ultrasonic array to measure the scattering matrix. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 55, 2254–2265 (2008)10.1109/TUFFC.924 ↗
18. Schmerr, L.W.: Fundamentals of Ultrasonic Non-destructive Evaluation: A Modelling Approach. Plenum, New York (1998)10.1007/978-1-4899-0142-2 ↗
19. Zhang, J., Drinkwater, B., Wilcox, P., Hunter, A.: Defect detection using ultrasonic arrays: the multi-mode total focusing method. NDT & E Int. 43, 123–133 (2010)10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.001 ↗
20. Miller, G.F., Pursey, H.: The field and radiation impedance of mechanical radiators on the free surface of a semi-infinite isotropic solid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 34, 521–541 (1954)10.1098/rspa.1954.0134 ↗
21. Velichko, A., Wilcox, P.: Reversible back-propagation imaging algorithm for postprocessing of ultrasonic array data. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56, 2492–2503 (2009)10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1336 ↗