journal article·2025-09Open access

Multiscale Characterization of Additive Manufacturing Components with Computed Tomography, 3D X-ray Microscopy, and Deep Learning

Herminso Villarraga-Gómez, Paul Brackman, Amirkoushyar Ziabari, Obaidullah Rahman, Zackary Snow, Ravi Shahani, Katrin Bugelnig, Andriy Andreyev, Yulia Trenikhina, Nathan Johnson, Hrishikesh Bale, Julian Schulz, Edson Costa Santos

Abstract

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) facilitates the creation of complex-geometry parts, driving advancements in lightweight aerospace components, high-efficiency engine cooling channels, and customized medical implants. However, ensuring the quality and reliability of AM parts remains challenging due to internal defects, surface irregularities, porosity, and residual trapped powder, which are often inaccessible to traditional inspection methods. Recent developments in X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and 3D X-ray microscopy (XRM), particularly systems equipped with resolution-at-a-distance (RaaD™) capabilities, enable high-resolution, non-destructive evaluation of AM components across multiple scales, from sub-micrometer to macroscopic levels. This paper explores modern XCT and XRM techniques for multiscale characterization of AM parts, focusing on their ability to detect and analyze defects such as porosity, cracks, inclusions, and surface roughness, while offering insights into defect formation mechanisms, material properties, and process-induced variations. The integration of deep learning (DL) frameworks, including Simurgh, DeepRecon, and DeepScout, enhances XCT/XRM workflows by reducing scan times, improving resolution recovery, and enabling accurate defect detection even with limited projection data. These DL-based methods overcome limitations of traditional reconstruction techniques, enabling faster, more reliable characterization of dense materials like Inconel 718 and novel alloys such as AlCe. Applications include process parameter optimization, high-throughput quality control, and multistage AM process evaluation, with DL-enhanced workflows accelerating analysis times from weeks to days. Correlative imaging approaches further validate XCT and XRM data against scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of physically sectioned samples, confirming the accuracy of DL-based reconstructions and enabling comprehensive defect analysis. While challenges remain in generalizing DL models to diverse materials and imaging conditions, improvements in resolution, noise reduction, and defect detection highlight the transformative potential of these methods. This multiscale and correlative approach enables precise identification and correlation of microstructural features with the overall performance of AM components. By integrating advanced XCT, XRM, and DL techniques, this paper demonstrates a significant leap forward in AM characterization, offering valuable insights into the relationships between processing parameters, microstructure, and part performance, and driving innovations that enhance the quality and reliability of AM products for demanding industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Thompson, A., Maskery, I., Leach, R.K.: X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: A review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27(17pp), 072001 (2016)10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001 ↗
2. Hassen, A.A., Kirka, M.M.: Additive manufacturing: The rise of a technology and the need for quality control and inspection techniques. Mater. Eval. 76(4), 439–453 (2018)
3. du Plessis, A., Yadroitsev, I., Yadroitsava, I., Le Roux, S.G.: X-Ray microcomputed tomography in additive manufacturing: A review of the current technology and applications. 3D Print. Additive Manuf. 5(3), 227–247 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2018.006010.1089/3dp.2018.0060 ↗
4. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Lee, C., Corbett, T., Tarbutton, J.A., Smith, S.T.: Assesing additive manufacturing processes with X-ray CT metrology, in ASPE Spring Topical Meeting, Raleigh, NC, (2015)
5. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Peitsch, C.M., Ramsey, A., Smith, S.T.: The role of computed tomography in additive manufacturing. in In: 2018 ASPE and Euspen Summer Topical Meeting: Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing, pp. 201–209. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California (USA) (2018)
6. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Frederick, C., Brackman, P., Andreyev, A., Trenikhina, Y., Johnson, N., Bale, H.: Non-destructive characterization of additive manufacturing components with computed tomography and 3D X-ray microscopy, in 13th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography (iCT), Wels, Austria, (2024)
7. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Herazo, E.L., Smith, S.T.: X-ray computed tomography: From medical imaging to dimensional metrology. Precis. Eng. 60, 44–569 (2019)10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.06.007 ↗
8. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Morse, E.P., Smith, S.T.: Assessing the effect of penetration length variations on dimensional measurements with X-ray computed tomography. Precis. Eng. 79, 146–163 (2023)10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.10.001 ↗
9. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Begun, D.L., Bhattad, P., Mo, K., Norouzi Rad, M., White, R.T., Kelly, S.T.: Assessing rechargeable batteries with 3D X-ray microscopy, computed tomography, and nanotomography. Nondestructive Test. Evaluation. 37(5), 519–535 (2022)10.1080/10589759.2022.2070165 ↗
10. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Crosby, K., Terada, M., Rad, M.N.: Assessing electronics with advanced 3D X-ray imaging techniques, nanoscale tomography, and deep learning. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 24, 2113–2128 (2024)10.1007/s11668-024-01989-5 ↗
11. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Kotwal, N., Parwani, R., Weiß, D., Krenkel, M., Kimmig, W.: Graf vom hagen, improving the dimensional accuracy of 3D X-ray microscopy data. Meas. Sci. Technol. 33(7), 074002, 10 (2022)10.1088/1361-6501/ac5a30 ↗
12. Bellens, S., Guerrero, P., Vandewalle, P., Dewulf, W.: Machine learning in industrial X-ray computed tomography– a review. CIRP J. Manufact. Sci. Technol. 51, 324–341 (2024)10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.05.004 ↗
13. Ziabari, A., Venkatakrishnan, S.V., Snow, Z., Lisovich, A., Sprayberry, M., Brackman, P., Frederick, F., Bhattad, B., Graham, S., Bingham, P., Dehoff, R., Plotkowski, A., Paquit, V.: Enabling rapid X-ray CT characterisation for additive manufacturing using CAD models and deep learning-based reconstruction. Npj Comput. Mater. 9(91), 10 (2023)
14. Ziabari, A., Venkatakrishnan, S., Dubey, A., Lisovich, A., Brackman, B., Frederick, C., Bhattad, P., Bingham, P., Plotkowski, A., Dehoff, R., Paquit, V.: Simurgh: A framework for cad-driven deep learning based x-ray ct reconstruction, in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Bordeaux, France, pp. 3836-3867, (2022)10.1109/ICIP46576.2022.9898017 ↗
15. Laboratory, O.R.N.: Simurgh: AI-assisted CT scan optimization, [Online]. Available: https://www.ornl.gov/technology/90000193. [Accessed May 2025]
16. Ziabari, A., Bedhief, M.H., Rahman, O., Venkatakrishnan, S., Brackman, P., Katuch, P.: Combining deep learning and scatterControl for high-throughput X-ray CT based non-destructive characterization of large-scale casted metallic components, in 14th International Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography (iCT), Antwerp, Belgium, (2025)10.1007/s10921-025-01228-3 ↗
17. Rahman, O., Venkatakrishnan, S.V., Snow, Z., Brackman, P., Feldhausen, T., Dehoff, R., Paquit, V., Ziabari, A.: Neural Network-based Single-material Beam Hardening Correction for X-ray CT in Additive Manufacturing, in 17th International Meeting on Fully 3D Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA, (2023)
18. Palenstijn, W.J., Batenburg, K.J., Sijbers, J.: The ASTRA tomography toolbox, in 13th International Conferenceon Computational and Mathematical Methodsin Science and Engineering, Almería, Spain, (2013)
19. Zhu, J.Y., Park, T., Isola, P., Efros, A.A.: Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation Using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks, in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, (2017)10.1109/ICCV.2017.244 ↗
20. Ziabari, A., Rahman, O., Franklin, R., Sprayberry, M., Peles, A.: High-Throughput Characterization Tools/Algorithms To Outline Porosity Variability In AM Samples As A Function OF Processing Conditions, ORNL/SPR-2025/3776, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, (2025)10.2172/3002622 ↗
21. Snow, Z., Scime, L., Ziabari, A., Fisher, B., Paquit, V.: Scalable in situ non-destructive evaluation of additively manufactured components using process monitoring, sensor fusion, and machine learning. Additive Manuf. 78, 103817 (2023)10.1016/j.addma.2023.103817 ↗
22. Ziabari, A., Snow, Z., Ortega, J., Paquit, V.: Deep Learning Based Sparse X-ray CT Image Reconstruction of Thick and Complex AM Parts Made of High-Density Nickle Super-Alloys, in International Workshop On Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation (ENDE), Knoxville, TN, USA, (2025)
23. Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C., Kress, J.W.: Practical cone-beam algorithm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 1(6), 612–619 (1984)10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612 ↗
24. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Smith, S.T.: Effect of the number of projections on dimensional measurements with X-ray computed tomography. Precis. Eng. 66, 445–456 (2020)10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.08.006 ↗
25. Jerri, A.J.: The Shannon Sampling Theorem—Its Various Extensions and Applications: A Tutorial Review, in Proc. of the IEEE, Vol: 65, no 11, (1977)10.1109/PROC.1977.10771 ↗
26. Fieser, D., Lawton, M., Bahl, S., Ziabari, A., Plotkowski, A., McDonald, E., Babu, S., Hu, A.: Processing, mechanical properties, and microstructure characterization of Crack-free AlCe-Ni alloys with laser additive manufacturing. Under Rev., (2025)
27. Da, G., Lambert-Garcia, R., ocine, S., Fan, X., Greenhalgh, H., Shahani, R., Majkut, M., Rack, A., Lee, P.D., Alex, C.L., Leung: Correlative spatter and vapour depression dynamics during laser powder bed fusion of an Al-Fe-Zr alloy. Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 6(5), 055601 (2024)10.1088/2631-7990/ad4e1d ↗
28. Team, O.D.: ICP registration, in Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processing, [Online]. Available: https://www.open3d.org/docs/latest/tutorial/pipelines/icp_registration.html. [Accessed May 2025]
29. Bhattad, P., Sarraf, A.: Addressing variable print quality in am using novel deep-learning based CT solutions, in RAPID+TCT conference, Chicago, IL, USA, (2023)
30. Ziabari, A.K., Rahman, O., Pisa, G., Shahani, R., Stoppiglia, H., Panourgias, G., Brackman, P., Santos, E., Frederick, C., Requena, G., Bugelnig, K., Boller, E.: A comparative study of non-destructive evaluation techniques: ultrasonic testing, X-ray computed tomography, and large-field-of-view synchrotron tomography, in ASTM ICAM conference, Atlanta, (2024)
31. Robsertson, J., Poly, S., Shahani, R.: Validating porosity prediction for aluminum laser powder bed fusion components, in RAPID+TCT conference, Detroit, MI, USA, (2025)
32. Pramanik, A., Venkatakrishnan, S.V., Rahman, O., Ziabari, A.: A learnt half-quadratic splitting-based algorithm for fast and high-quality industrial cone-beam CT reconstruction, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2501.13128, (2025)
33. Pramanik, A., Rahman, O., Venkatakrishnan, S.V., Ziabari, A.: A fast, scalable, and robust deep learning-based iterative reconstruction framework for accelerated industrial cone-beam X-ray computed tomography. ArXiv e-prints. (2025). arXiv:2501.13961
34. Slotwinski, J.A., Garboczi, E.J., Stutzman, P.E., Ferraris, C.F., Watson, S.S., Peltz, M.A.: Characterization of metal powders used for additive manufacturing. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 119, 460–493 (2014)10.6028/jres.119.018 ↗
35. Kim, F.H., Moylan, S.P., Garboczi, E.J., Slotwinski, J.A.: Investigation of pore structure in Cobalt Chrome additively manufactured parts using X-ray computed tomography and three-dimensional image analysis. Additive Manuf. 17, 23–38 (2017)10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.011 ↗
36. DebRoy, T., Wei, H.L., Zuback, J.S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J.W., Milewski, J.O., Beese, A.M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A., Zhang, W.: Additive manufacturing of metallic components– Process, structure and properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 92, 112–224 (2017)10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
37. Sames, W.J., List, F.A., Pannala, S., Dehoff, R.R., Babu, S.S.: The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int. Mater. Rev. 65(5), 315–360 (2016)10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 ↗
38. Sutton, A.T., Kriewal, C.S., Leu, M.C., Newkirk, J.W.: Powders for additive manufacturing processes: Characterization techniques and effects on part properties, in Proc.of 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium–An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, Texas (USA), pp. 1004-1030, (2016)
39. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Ramsey, A., Seifi, M., Peitsch, C.M.: The role of X-ray computed tomography in additive manufacturing. in In: 2018 ASPE and Euspen Summer Topical Meeting: Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California (USA) (2018)
40. Slotwinski, J.A., Garboczi, E.J., Hebenstreit, K.M.: Porosity measurements and analysis for metal additive manufacturing process control. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 119, 494–528 (2014)10.6028/jres.119.019 ↗
41. Wits, W.W., Carmignato, S., Zanini, F., Vaneker, T.H.: Porosity testing methods for the quality assessment of selective laser melted parts. CIRP Ann. 65(1), 201–204 (2016)10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.054 ↗
42. Hermanek, P., Zanini, F., Carmignato, S., Savio, E.: X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: Accuracy and porosity measurements, in ASPE/euspen 2016 Summer Topical Meeting, Raleigh, NC (USA), (2016)
43. Seifi, M., Gorelik, M., Waller, J., Hrabe, N., Shamsaei, N., Daniewicz, S., Lewandowski, J.: Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification. J. Minerals Met. Mater. Soc. 69(3), 439–455 (2017)10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 ↗
44. Adair, D., Kirka, M.,Ryan, D.: Additive Manufacture of Prototype Turbine Blades for Hot-Fired Engine Performance Validation Trials, in Proc. of the ASME Turbo Expo: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA, paper no GT2019-90966, V006T24A012, pp. 1-8, 2019. (2019)
45. Gallardo, D., Lucía-Candela, D., Jiménez, R., Torralba, M., Albajez, J.A., Yagüe-Fabra, J.A.: X-Ray computed tomography performance in metrological evaluation and characterisation of polymeric additive manufactured surfaces. Additive Manuf. 75, 103754 (2023)10.1016/j.addma.2023.103754 ↗
46. Lifton, J.J., Liu, Y., Tan, Z.J., Mutiargo, B., Goh, X.Q., Malcolm, A.A.: Internal surface roughness measurement of metal additively manufactured samples via x-ray CT: The influence of surrounding material thickness. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 9, 035008 (2021)10.1088/2051-672X/ac0e7c ↗
47. Klingaa, C.G., Dahmen, T., Baier, S., Mohanty, S., Hattel, J.H.: X-ray CT and image analysis methodology for local roughness characterization in cooling channels made by metal additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 32, 101032 (2020)10.1016/j.addma.2019.101032 ↗
48. Lettenbauer, H., Lotze, A., Kunzmann, S.: Method and device for identifying material boundaries of a test object. United States Patent US. 8(045,806 B2), 25 (Oct. 2011)
49. Reinhart, C.: Industrial computer tomography– A universal inspection tool, in 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Shanghai, China, (2008)
50. Andrew, M., Omlor, L., Andreyev, A., Sanapala, R., Khoshkhoo, M.S.: New technologies for X-ray Microscopy: phase correction and fully automated deep learning based tomographic reconstruction, in Proc. SPIE 11840, Developments in X-Ray Tomography XIII, 118400I, San Diego, CA, USA, (2021)10.1117/12.2596592 ↗
51. Andrew, M., Andreyev, A., Yang, F., Terada, M., Gu, A., White, R.: Fully automated deep learning-based resolution recovery, in Proc. SPIE 12242, Developments in X-Ray Tomography XIV, 122420M, San Diego, CA, USA, (2022)10.1117/12.2633095 ↗
52. Johnson, N.S., Trenikhina, Y., Bale, H., Kelly, S.: Deep-learning models enable high-resolution reconstruction of large-volume x-ray microscopy datasets, in Proc. SPIE 13152, Developments in X-Ray Tomography XV, 131520U, San Diego, CA, USA, (2024)10.1117/12.3027501 ↗
53. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Andreyev, A., Andrew, M., Bale, H., Sanapala, R., Terada, M., Gu, A., Johnson, B., Omlor, L.: and C. Graf vom Hagen, Improving scan time and image quality in 3D X-ray microscopy by deep learning reconstruction techniques, in Proc. of 35th ASPE Annual Meeting, Vol 75, pp. 361-366, Minneapolis, MN, USA, (2021)
54. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Norouzi Rad, M., Andrew, M., Andreyev, A., Sanapala, R., Omlor, L.: and C. Graf von Hagen, Improving throughput and image quality of high-resolution 3D X-ray microscopes using deep learning reconstruction techniques, in Proc. of 11th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography, Wels, Austria, pp. 1-6, (2022)
55. Bukka, V.V.R., Xu, M., Andrew, M., Andreyev, A.: Assessment of deep-learning-based resolution recovery algorithm relative to imaging system resolution and feature size. Methods Microscopy, pp. 1–9, (2025)10.1515/mim-2024-0017 ↗