Multiple Fault Diagnosis in a Wind Turbine Gearbox with Autoencoder Data Augmentation and KPCA Dimension Reduction

Leonardo Oldani Felix; Dionísio Henrique Carvalho de Sá Só Martins; Ulisses Admar Barbosa Vicente Monteiro; Luiz Antonio Vaz Pinto; Luís Tarrataca; Carlos Alfredo Orfão Martins

doi:10.1007/s10921-024-01131-3

journal article·2024-12

Multiple Fault Diagnosis in a Wind Turbine Gearbox with Autoencoder Data Augmentation and KPCA Dimension Reduction

Leonardo Oldani Felix, Dionísio Henrique Carvalho de Sá Só Martins, Ulisses Admar Barbosa Vicente Monteiro, Luiz Antonio Vaz Pinto, Luís Tarrataca, Carlos Alfredo Orfão Martins

Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation· Volume 43· Issue 4

Publisher page

Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references

1. Shen, G., Xiang, D., Zhu, K., Jiang, L., Shen, Y., Li, Y.: Fatigue failure mechanism of planetary gear train of wind turbine gearbox. Eng. Fail. Anal. 87, 96–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.01.00710.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.01.007 ↗

2. Gong, Y., Fei, J.L., Tang, J., Yang, Z.G., Han, Y.M., Li, X.: Failure analysis on abnormal wear of roller bearings in gearbox for wind turbine. Eng. Fail. Anal. 82, 26–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.08.01510.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.08.015 ↗

3. Su, Y., Meng, L., Kong, X., Xu, T., Lan, X., Li, Y.: Small sample fault diagnosis method for wind turbine gearbox based on optimized generative adversarial methods. Eng. Fail. Anal. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10657310.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106573 ↗

4. Straczkiewicz, M., Barszcz, T.: Application of artificial neural network for damage detection in planetary gearbox of wind turbine. Shock. Vib. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/408632410.1155/2016/4086324 ↗

5. Zhang, X., Han, P., Xu, L., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Gao, L.: Research on bearing fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox based on 1DCNN-PSO-SVM. IEEE Access 8, 192248–192258 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.303271910.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032719 ↗

6. Saravanan, N., Ramachandran, K.I.: Incipient gearbox fault diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for feature extraction and classification using artificial neural networks (ANN). Expert Syst. Appl. 37(6), 4168–4418 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.00610.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.006 ↗

7. Desavale, R.G., Jadhav, P.M., Dharwadkar, N.V.: Dynamic response analysis of gearbox to improve fault detection using empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural network techniques. J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405134410.1115/1.4051344 ↗

8. Wang, Y., Sun, G., Jin, Q.: Imbalanced sample fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using conditional variational autoencoder generative adversarial network. Appl. Soft Comput. J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.10633310.1016/j.asoc.2020.106333 ↗

9. Wan, Z., Zhang, Y., He, H.: Variational autoencoder based synthetic data generation for imbalanced learning. IEEE Symp. Ser. Comput. Intell. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2017.828516810.1109/SSCI.2017.8285168 ↗

10. Xing, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Li, J.: Intelligent diagnosis of rolling bearings with imbalanced data based on the ConVAE-CNN model. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2369/1/01200110.1088/1742-6596/2369/1/012001 ↗

11. Babaei, K., Chen, Z.Y., Maul, T.: Data augmentation by autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection. Cornell University (2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.1338410.48550/arXiv.1912.13384 ↗

12. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority oversampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16(1), 321–357 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.95310.1613/jair.953 ↗

13. Han, H., Wang, W.Y., Mao, B.H.: Boderline-smote: a new oversampling method in imbalanced datasets learning. Adv. Intell. Comput. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11538059_9110.1007/11538059_91 ↗

14. He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E.A., Li, S.: ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw. 3, 1322–1328 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2008.463396910.1109/IJCNN.2008.4633969 ↗

15. Goodfellow, I.J., Abadie, J.P., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Farley, D.W., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio. Y.: Generative Adversarial Networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.266110.48550/arXiv.1406.2661 ↗

16. Douzas, G., Bacao, F.: Effective data generation for imbalanced learning using conditional generative adversarial networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 91, 464–471 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.03010.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.030 ↗

17. Delgado, J.M.D., Oyedele, L.: Deep learning with small datasets: using autoencoder to address limited datasets in construction management. Appl. Soft Comput. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.10783610.1016/j.asoc.2021.107836 ↗

18. Li, X., Li, J., Qu, Y., He, D.: Semi-supervised gear fault diagnosis using raw vibration signal based on deep learning. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 33(2), 418–428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.04.01810.1016/j.cja.2019.04.018 ↗

19. Goubeaud, M., Joußen, P., Gmyrek, N., Ghorban, F., Schelkes, L., Kummert, A.: Using variational autoencoder to augment sparse time series datasets. In: 7th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA), Wolfenbüttel, Germany, pp. 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOA51614.2021.944261910.1109/ICOA51614.2021.9442619 ↗

20. Ma, Z., Cao, M., Deng, Yi., Jiang, Y., Tian, Ye., Wang, X.: Typical fault prediction method for wind turbines based on an improved stacked autoencoder network. Energy Harvest. Syst. 11(1), 1–11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1515/ehs-2023-007210.1515/ehs-2023-0072 ↗

21. Zhao, D., Liu, S., Gu, D., Sun, X., Wang, L., Wei, Y., Zhang, H.: Enhanced data-driven fault diagnosis for machines with small and unbalanced data based on variational auto-encoder. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab55f810.1088/1361-6501/ab55f8 ↗

22. Shao, R., Hu, W., Wang, Y., Qi, X.: The fault feature extraction and classification of gear using principal component analysis and kernel principal component analysis based on wavelet packet transform. Measurement 54, 118–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.01610.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.016 ↗

23. Cheng, G., Chen, X., Li, H., Li, P., Liu, H.: Study on planetary gear fault diagnosis based on entropy feature fusion of ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Measurement 91, 140–154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.05910.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.059 ↗

24. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

25. Bedi, J., Toshniwal, D.: Energy load time-series forecast using decomposition and autoencoder integrated memory network. Appl. Soft Comput. J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.10639010.1016/j.asoc.2020.106390 ↗

26. Zhang, Y., Zuo, H., Bai, F.: Classification of fault location and performance degradation of a roller bearing. Measurement 46(3), 1178–1189 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.02510.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.025 ↗

27. Anowar, F., Sadaoui, S., Selim, B.: Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE). Comput. Sci. Rev. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.10037810.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100378 ↗

28. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., Müller, K.R.: Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Comput. 10(5), 1299–1319 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1162/08997669830001746710.1162/089976698300017467 ↗

29. Lee, J.-M., et al.: Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59(1), 223–234 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.01210.1016/j.ces.2003.09.012 ↗

30. Wang, W., Zhang, M., Wang, D., Jian, Y.: Kernel PCA feature extraction and the SVM classification algorithm for multiple-status, through-wall, human being detection. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-017-0931-210.1186/s13638-017-0931-2 ↗

31. Genton, M.G.: Classes of kernels for machine learning: a statistics perspective. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 299–312 (2001)

32. Harkat, M.-F., et al.: Machine learning-based reduced kernel PCA model for nonlinear chemical process monitoring. J. Control Autom. Electr. Syst. 31(5), 1196–1209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-020-00604-w10.1007/s40313-020-00604-w ↗

33. Attouri, K., et al.: Wind power converter fault diagnosis using reduced kernel PCA-based BiLSTM. Sustainability 15(4), 1–19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1504319110.3390/su15043191 ↗

34. Gwashavanhu, B.K., Oberholster, A.J., Heyns, S.P.: A comparative study of principal component analysis and kernel principal component analysis for photogrammetric shape-based turbine blade damage analysis. Eng. Struct. 318, 1–18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11871210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118712 ↗

35. Olsson D (2011) Applications and implementation of kernel principal component analysis to specific data sets. Master’s Thesis Report, University of Florida.

36. Chang, Q., Chen, Q., Wang, X.: Scaling Gaussian RBF kernel width to improve SVM classification. In: International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNNB.2005.161455910.1109/ICNNB.2005.1614559 ↗

37. Syed, S.H., Muralidharan, V.: Feature extraction using discrete wavelet transform for fault classification of planetary gearbox—a comparative study. Appl. Acoust. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.10857210.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108572 ↗

38. Quiroz, J.C., Mariun, N., Mehrjou, M.R., Izadi, M., Misron, N., Radzi, M.A.M.: Fault detection of broken rotor bar in LS-PMSM using random forests. Measurement 116, 273–280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.00410.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.004 ↗

39. Sheng S (2012) Wind turbine gearbox vibration condition monitoring benchmarking datasets. National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/TP-5000–54530.

40. Felix, L.O., de Sá Só Martins, D.H., Monteiro, U.A., et al.: A feature selection committee method using empirical mode decomposition for multiple fault classification in a wind turbine Gearbox. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 42, 85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-023-00996-010.1007/s10921-023-00996-0 ↗

41. International Standard, ISO 10816-21:2015: Mechanical vibration—evaluation of machine vibration by measurements on non-rotating parts—Horizontal axis wind turbines with gearbox (2015)

42. Kordestani, M., Rezamand, M., Orchard, M., Carriveau, R., Ting, D.S.K., Saif, M.: Planetary gear faults detection in wind turbine gearbox based on a ten years historical data from three wind farms. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(2), 10318–10323 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.276710.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2767 ↗

43. Amin, A., Bibo, A., Panyam, M., Tallapragada, P.: Vibration based fault diagnostics in a wind turbine planetary gearbox using machine learning. Wind Eng. 47(1), 175–189 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X22112396810.1177/0309524X221123968 ↗

44. Shen, C., Wang, J., Chen, J., Zhang, B.: Gearbox fault diagnosis for wind turbine based on data augmentation using improved generative adversarial networks. In: International Conference on Electrical Materials and Power Equipment (ICEMPE) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMPE51623.2021.950905610.1109/ICEMPE51623.2021.9509056 ↗