Evaluation of Ultrasonic SH-Waveform Tomography for Determining Cover Thickness and Rebar Size in Concrete Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. McCann, D.M., Forde, M.C.: Review of NDT methods in the assessment of concrete and masonry structures. NDT E Int. 34(2), 71–84 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00032-310.1016/S0963-8695(00)00032-3 ↗
2. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Duong, T.H.: An algorithm for automatic localization and detection of rebars from GPR data of concrete bridge decks. Autom. Constr. 89, 292–298 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.01710.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.017 ↗
3. Algernon, D., Hiltunen, D.R., Ferraro, C.C., Ishee, C.: Rebar detection with cover meter and ultrasonic pulse echo combined with automated scanning system. Transp. Res. Rec. 2251(1), 123–131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3141/2251-1310.3141/2251-13 ↗
4. Hoegh, K., Khazanovich, L., Yu, H.T.: Ultrasonic tomography for evaluation of concrete pavements. Transp. Res. Rec. 2232(1), 85–94 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3141/2232-0910.3141/2232-09 ↗
5. Hasan, M.I., Yazdani, N.: Ground penetrating radar utilization in exploring inadequate concrete covers in a new bridge deck. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 1, 104–114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2014.04.00310.1016/j.cscm.2014.04.003 ↗
6. Wiwatrojanagul, P., Sahamitmongkol, R., Tangtermsirikul, S., Khamsemanan, N.: A new method to determine locations of rebars and estimate cover thickness of RC structures using GPR data. Constr. Build. Mater. 140, 257–273 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.02.12610.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.02.126 ↗
7. Utsi, V., Utsi, E.: Measurement of reinforcement bar depths and diameters in concrete. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004, pp. 659–662. IEEE (2004)
8. Zhou, F., Chen, Z., Liu, H., Cui, J., Spencer, B.F., Fang, G.: Simultaneous estimation of rebar diameter and cover thickness by a GPR-EMI dual sensor. Sensors 18(9), 2969 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1809296910.3390/s18092969 ↗
9. Chang, C.W., Lin, C.H., Lien, H.S.: Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR. Constr. Build. Mater. 23(2), 1057–1063 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.01810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.018 ↗
10. Zhan, R., Xie, H.: GPR measurement of the diameter of steel bars in concrete specimens based on the stationary wavelet transform. Insight-Non-Destruct. Test. Cond. Monit. 51(3), 151–155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2009.51.3.15110.1784/insi.2009.51.3.151 ↗
11. Zanzi, L., Arosio, D.: Sensitivity and accuracy in rebar diameter measurements from dual-polarized GPR data. Constr. Build. Mater. 48, 1293–1301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.009 ↗
12. Hasan, M.I., Yazdani, N.: An experimental and numerical study on embedded rebar diameter in concrete using ground penetrating radar. Chin. J. Eng (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/971438110.1155/2016/9714381 ↗
13. Mechbal, Z., Khamlichi, A.: Determination of concrete rebars characteristics by enhanced post-processing of GPR scan raw data. NDT E Int. 89, 30–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.03.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2017.03.005 ↗
14. Hong, S., Lai, W.W.L., Wilsch, G., Helmerich, R., Helmerich, R., Günther, T., Wiggenhauser, H.: Periodic mapping of reinforcement corrosion in intrusive chloride contaminated concrete with GPR. Constr. Build. Mater. 66, 671–684 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.019 ↗
15. Dinh, K., Zayed, T., Moufti, S., Shami, A., Jabri, A., Abouhamad, M., Dawood, T.: Clustering-based threshold model for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks with ground-penetrating radar. Transp. Res. Rec. 2522(1), 81–89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3141/2522-0810.3141/2522-08 ↗
16. Popovics, J.S., Roesler, J.R., Bittner, J., Amirkhanian, A.N., Brand, A.S., Gupta, P., Flowers, K.: Ultrasonic imaging for concrete infrastructure condition assessment and quality assurance. Illinois Center for Transportation (2017)
17. Wang, X., Rister, B., Dadi, G.B.: Evaluating performance of ground penetrating radar (GPR) and pachometers for bridge deck reinforcing steel cover height verification. Construction Research Congress (2020)10.1061/9780784482865.131 ↗
18. Virieux, J., Operto, S.: An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics 74(6), WCC1–WCC26 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.323836710.1190/1.3238367 ↗
19. Pratt, R.G.: Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain; Part 1, Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics 64(3), 888–901 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.144459710.1190/1.1444597 ↗
20. Shipp, R.M., Singh, S.C.: Two-dimensional full wavefield inversion of wide-aperture marine seismic streamer data. Geophys. J. Int. 151(2), 325–344 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01645.x10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01645.x ↗
21. Ravaut, C., Operto, S., Improta, L., Virieux, J., Herrero, A., Dell’Aversana, P.: Multiscale imaging of complex structures from multifold wide-aperture seismic data by frequency-domain full-waveform tomography: application to a thrust belt. Geophys. J. Int. 159(3), 1032–1056 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02442.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02442.x ↗
22. Sheen, D.H., Tuncay, K., Baag, C.E., Ortoleva, P.J.: Time domain Gauss—Newton seismic waveform inversion in elastic media. Geophys. J. Int. 167(3), 1373–1384 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03162.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03162.x ↗
23. Sears, T.J., Singh, S.C., Barton, P.J.: Elastic full waveform inversion of multi-component OBC seismic data. Geophys. Prospect. 56(6), 843–862 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00692.x10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00692.x ↗
24. Prieux, V., Brossier, R., Operto, S., Virieux, J.: Multiparameter full waveform inversion of multicomponent ocean-bottom-cable data from the Valhall field. Part 1: imaging compressional wave speed, density and attenuation. Geophys. J. Int. 194(3), 1640–1664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt17710.1093/gji/ggt177 ↗
25. Métivier, L., Bretaudeau, F., Brossier, R., Operto, S., Virieux, J.: Full waveform inversion and the truncated Newton method: quantitative imaging of complex subsurface structures. Geophys. Prospect. 62(6), 1353–1375 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.1213610.1111/1365-2478.12136 ↗
26. Tran, K.T., McVay, M., Faraone, M., Horhota, D.: Sinkhole detection using 2D full seismic waveform tomographySinkhole detection by FWI. Geophysics 78(5), R175–R183 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0063.110.1190/geo2013-0063.1 ↗
27. Tran, K.T., Sperry, J.: Application of 2D full-waveform tomography on land-streamer data for assessment of roadway subsidence. Geophysics 83(3), EN1–EN11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0550.110.1190/geo2016-0550.1 ↗
28. Epanomeritakis, I., Akçelik, V., Ghattas, O., Bielak, J.: A Newton-CG method for large-scale three-dimensional elastic full-waveform seismic inversion. Inverse Prob. 24(3), 034015 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/03401510.1088/0266-5611/24/3/034015 ↗
29. Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L., Igel, H., Bunge, H.P.: Full seismic waveform tomography for upper-mantle structure in the Australasian region using adjoint methods. Geophys. J. Int. 179(3), 1703–1725 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04368.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04368.x ↗
30. Tape, C., Liu, Q., Maggi, A., Tromp, J.: Seismic tomography of the southern California crust based on spectral-element and adjoint methods. Geophys. J. Int. 180(1), 433–462 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04429.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04429.x ↗
31. Vigh, D., Kapoor, J., Moldoveanu, N., Li, H.: Breakthrough acquisition and technologies for subsalt imaging. Geophysics 76(5), WB41–WB51 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0399.110.1190/geo2010-0399.1 ↗
32. Warner, M., Ratcliffe, A., Nangoo, T., Morgan, J., Umpleby, A., Shah, N., Conroy, G.: Anisotropic 3D full-waveform inversion. Geophysics 78(2), R59–R80 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0338.110.1190/geo2012-0338.1 ↗
33. Ha, W., Kang, S.G., Shin, C.: 3D Laplace-domain waveform inversion using a low-frequency time-domain modeling algorithm. Geophysics 80(1), R1–R13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0332.110.1190/geo2013-0332.1 ↗
34. Métivier, L., Brossier, R., Mérigot, Q., Oudet, E., Virieux, J.: An optimal transport approach for seismic tomography: application to 3D full waveform inversion. Inverse Prob. 32(11), 115008 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/32/11/11500810.1088/0266-5611/32/11/115008 ↗
35. Trinh, P.T., Brossier, R., Métivier, L., Tavard, L., Virieux, J.: Efficient time-domain 3D elastic and viscoelastic full-waveform inversion using a spectral-element method on flexible Cartesian-based mesh. Geophysics 84(1), R61–R83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0059.110.1190/geo2018-0059.1 ↗
36. Nguyen, T.D., Tran, K.T.: Site characterization with 3D elastic full-waveform tomography Geotechnical site characterization with 3D FWI. Geophysics 83(5), R389–R400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0571.110.1190/geo2017-0571.1 ↗
37. Mirzanejad, M., Tran, K.T.: 3D viscoelastic full waveform inversion of seismic waves for geotechnical site investigation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 122, 67–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.00510.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.005 ↗
38. Tran, K.T., Mirzanejad, M., McVay, M., Horhota, D.: 3-D time-domain Gauss-Newton full waveform inversion for near-surface site characterization. Geophys. J. Int. 217(1), 206–218 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz02010.1093/gji/ggz020 ↗
39. Tran, K.T., Nguyen, T.D., Hiltunen, D.R., Stokoe, K., Menq, F.: 3D full-waveform inversion in time-frequency domain: field data application. J. Appl. Geophys. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.10407810.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104078 ↗
40. Mirzanejad, M., Tran, K.T., McVay, M., Horhota, D., Wasman, S.J.: Coupling of SPT and 3D full waveform inversion for deep site characterization. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 136, 106196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.10619610.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106196 ↗
41. Mirzanejad, M., Tran, K.T., McVay, M., Horhota, D., Wasman, S.J.: Sinkhole detection with 3D full seismic waveform tomography. Geophysics 85(5), B169–B179 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0490.110.1190/geo2019-0490.1 ↗
42. Rao, J., Ratassepp, M., Fan, Z.: Limited-view ultrasonic guided wave tomography using an adaptive regularization method. J. Appl. Phys. 120(19), 194902 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496779010.1063/1.4967790 ↗
43. Rao, J., Ratassepp, M., Fan, Z.: Investigation of the reconstruction accuracy of guided wave tomography using full waveform inversion. J. Sound Vib. 400, 317–328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.04.01710.1016/j.jsv.2017.04.017 ↗
44. Nguyen, L.T., Modrak, R.T.: Ultrasonic wavefield inversion and migration in complex heterogeneous structures: 2D numerical imaging and nondestructive testing experiments. Ultrasonics 82, 357–370 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.01110.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.011 ↗
45. Jalinoos, F., Tran, K.T., Nguyen, T.D., Agrawal, A.K.: Evaluation of bridge abutments and bounded wall type structures with ultraseismic waveform tomography. J. Bridg. Eng. 22(12), 04017104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000115010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001150 ↗
46. Tran, K.T., Jalinoos, F., Nguyen, T.D., Agrawal, A.K.: Evaluation of bridge abutment with ultraseismic waveform tomography: field data application. J. Nondestr. Eval. 38(4), 95 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-019-0631-410.1007/s10921-019-0631-4 ↗
47. Nguyen, T.D., Tran, K.T., Gucunski, N.: Detection of bridge-deck delamination using full ultrasonic waveform tomography. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23(2), 04016027 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000032310.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000323 ↗
48. Chen, R., Tran, K.T., Wang, Y.: Time-domain full waveform inversion of SH-and Love-waves for geotechnical site characterization. Near Surf. Geophys. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.1213710.1002/nsg.12137 ↗
49. Schickert, M., Krause, M., Müller, W.: Ultrasonic imaging of concrete elements using reconstruction by synthetic aperture focusing technique. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 15(3), 235–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(235)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(235) ↗
50. Virieux, J.: SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 49(11), 1933–1942 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.144160510.1190/1.1441605 ↗
51. Levander, A.R.: Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53(11), 1425–1436 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.144242210.1190/1.1442422 ↗
52. Komatitsch, D., Martin, R.: An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics 72(5), SM155–SM167 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.275758610.1190/1.2757586 ↗
53. Plessix, R.E.: A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophys. J. Int. 167(2), 495–503 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02978.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02978.x ↗
54. Tikhonov, A.N., Arsenin, V.Y.: Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems, pp. 1–30. Springer, New York (1977)
55. Nocedal, J., Wright, S.: Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York (2006)
56. Zhang, Z., Huang, L., Lin, Y.: Double‐difference elastic‐waveform inversion with weighted gradients for monitoring EGS reservoirs. In: Thirty-Seventh Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University, California (2012)
57. Busch, S., van der Kruk, J., Bikowski, J., Vereecken, H.: Quantitative conductivity and permittivity estimation using full-waveform inversion of on-ground GPR data. Geophysics 77(6), H79–H91 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0045.110.1190/geo2012-0045.1 ↗
58. Ernst, J.R., Green, A.G., Maurer, H., Holliger, K.: Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data. Geophysics 72(5), J53–J64 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.276184810.1190/1.2761848 ↗
59. Schäfer, M., Groos, L., Forbriger, T., Bohlen, T.: On the effects of geometrical spreading corrections for a 2D full waveform inversion of recorded shallow seismic surface waves. In: 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating EUROPEC 2012. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, pp. cp-293–00298. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20148327 (2012)10.3997/2214-4609.20148327 ↗
60. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Tran, K.T., Novo, A., Nguyen, T.: Full-resolution 3D imaging for concrete structures with dual-polarization GPR. Autom. Constr. 125, 103652 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10365210.1016/j.autcon.2021.103652 ↗
61. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Zayed, T.: Automated visualization of concrete bridge deck condition from GPR data. NDT E Int. 102, 120–128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.01510.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.015 ↗