DataVXJournal of Nondestructive EvaluationPaper
journal article·2023-12

A Review on Application of Acoustic Emission Testing During Additive Manufacturing

Prabhat Ranjan Prem, Ambily Parukutty Sanker, Shilpa Sebastian, Senthil Kumar Kaliyavaradhan

Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation· Volume 42· Issue 4
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Materials processing

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Standard, A.: ISO/ASTM 52900: 2015 additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology. ASTM F2792-10e1 (2012)
2. Giridhar, G., Prem, P.R., Kumar, S.: Development of concrete mixes for 3D printing using simple tools and techniques. Sadhana 48(1), 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02069-w10.1007/s12046-022-02069-w ↗
3. Khlybov, A.A., Uglov, A.L., Bakiev, T.A., Ryabov, D.A.: Assessment of the degree of damage in structural materials using the parameters of structural-acoustic noise. Nondestr. Test. Eval. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2022.212647010.1080/10589759.2022.2126470 ↗
4. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/3d-printing-market-1276.html
5. AbouelNour, Y., Gupta, N.: In-situ monitoring of sub-surface and internal defects in additive manufacturing: a review. Mater. Des. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11106310.1016/j.matdes.2022.111063 ↗
6. Kim, H., Lin, Y., Tseng, T.-L.B.: A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-004810.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048 ↗
7. Tapia, G., Elwany, A.: A review on process monitoring and control in metal-based additive manufacturing. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402854010.1115/1.4028540 ↗
8. Aleshin, N.P., Grigor’Ev, M.V., Shchipakov, N.A., Prilutskii, M.A., Murashov, V.V.: Using nondestructive testing methods for in-production quality control of additive manufactured parts. Russ. J. Nondestr. Test. 52, 532–7 (2016)10.1134/S1061830916090023 ↗
9. Lopez, A., Bacelar, R., Pires, I., Santos, T.G., Sousa, J.P., Quintino, L.: Non-destructive testing application of radiography and ultrasound for wire and arc additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 21, 298–306 (2018).
10. Bamberg, J., Zenzinger, G., Ladewig, A.: In-process control of selective laser melting by quantitative optical tomography. In 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (pp. 1–8) (2016, June). https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt2016/papers/th1b1.pdf.
11. Ramezani, M.B., Yahaghi, E., Nohekhan, M.: An empirical study of electrode degradation in gliding arc discharge. Russ. J. Nondestr. Test. 58(7), 632–642 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092207004X10.1134/S106183092207004X ↗
12. Balageas, D., Maldague, X., Burleigh, D., Vavilov, V.P., Oswald-Tranta, B., Roche, J.M., Carlomagno, G.M.: Thermal (IR) and other NDT techniques for improved material inspection. J. Nondestr. Eval. 35, 1–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-015-0331-710.1007/s10921-015-0331-7 ↗
13. Powierza, B., Stelzner, L., Oesch, T., Gollwitzer, C., Weise, F., Bruno, G.: Water migration in one-side heated concrete: 4D in-situ CT monitoring of the moisture-clog-effect. J. Nondestr. Eval. 38, 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0552-710.1007/s10921-018-0552-7 ↗
14. Park, S., Alnuaimi, H., Hayes, A., Sitkiewicz, M., Amjad, U., Muralidharan, K., Kundu, T.: Nonlinear acoustic technique for monitoring porosity in additively manufactured parts. J. Nondestr. Eval. Diagnostics Prognostics Eng. Syst. 5(2), 021008 (2022)10.1115/1.4053252 ↗
15. Azamfirei, V., Psarommatis, F., Lagrosen, Y.: Application of automation for in-line quality inspection, a zero-defect manufacturing approach. J. Manuf. Syst. 67, 1–22 (2023).10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.010 ↗
16. Diot, G., Koudri-David, A., Walaszek, H., Guégan, S., Flifla, J.: Non-destructive testing of porosity in laser welded aluminium alloy plates: laser ultrasound and frequency-bandwidth analysis. J. Nondestr. Eval. 32, 354–361 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-013-0189-510.1007/s10921-013-0189-5 ↗
17. Eslamlou, A.D., Ghaderiaram, A., Schlangen, E., Fotouhi, M.: A review on non-destructive evaluation of construction materials and structures using magnetic sensors. Constr. Build. Mater. 397, 132460 (2023)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132460 ↗
18. Gupta, M., Khan, M.A., Butola, R., Singari, R.M.: Advances in applications of non-destructive testing (NDT): a review. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 8(2), 2286–2307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.190933210.1080/2374068X.2021.1909332 ↗
19. Naidjate, M., Helifa, B., Feliachi, M., Lefkaier, I.K., Heuer, H., Schulze, M.: A smart eddy current sensor dedicated to the nondestructive evaluation of carbon fibers reinforced polymers. Sensors 17(9), 1996 (2017).10.3390/s17091996 ↗
20. Goszczyńska, B.: Analysis of the process of crack initiation and evolution in concrete with acoustic emission testing. Arch. Civil Mech. Eng. 14(1), 134–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.06.00210.1016/j.acme.2013.06.002 ↗
21. Prem, P.R., Murthy, A.R., Verma, M.: Theoretical modelling and acoustic emission monitoring of RC beams strengthened with UHPC. Constr. Build. Mater. 158, 670–682 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.06310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.063 ↗
22. Han, Z., Luo, H., Sun, C., Li, J., Papaelias, M., Davis, C.: Acoustic emission study of fatigue crack propagation in extruded az31 magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 597, 270–278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.08310.1016/j.msea.2013.12.083 ↗
23. Drissi-Daoudi, R., Masinelli, G., de Formanoir, C., Wasmer, K., Jhabvala, J., Logé, R.E.: Acoustic emission for the prediction of processing regimes in laser powder bed fusion, and the generation of processing maps. Addit. Manuf. 67, 103484 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10348410.1016/j.addma.2023.103484 ↗
24. Wu, S., Shan, Z., Chen, K., Wu, X., Zou, D., Wang, S., Xiong, J.: Investigation of bending performance of printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid using acoustic emission. Polym. Compos. 44(2), 863–872 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2713710.1002/pc.27137 ↗
25. Li, F., Yu, Z., Yang, Z., Shen, X.: Real-time distortion monitoring during fused deposition modeling via acoustic emission. Struct. Health Monit. 19(2), 412–423 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.00310.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.003 ↗
26. Yue, J.G., Beskos, D.E., Feng, C., Wu, K.: Hardened fracture characteristics of printed concrete using acoustic emission monitoring technique. Constr. Build. Mater. 361, 129684 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12968410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129684 ↗
27. Kaliyavaradhan, S.K., Ambily, P.S., Prem, P.R., Ghodke, S.B.: Test methods for 3D printable concrete. Autom. Constr. 142, 104529 (2022)10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104529 ↗
28. Ravichandran, D., Prem, P.R., Kaliyavaradhan, S.K., Ambily, P.S.: Influence of fibers on fresh and hardened properties of ultra high-performance concrete (UHPC)—a review. J. Build. Eng. 57, 104922 (2022)10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104922 ↗
29. Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L.A.: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: elaboration and explanation. Bmj (2015). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g764710.1136/bmj.g7647 ↗
30. Kannivel, S., Vellayaraj, A., Kolimi, I., Thomas, J.: Effect of thickness on indentation response and tensile loading behaviour of glass/epoxy laminates under acoustic emission monitoring. Nondestr. Test. Eval. 36(2), 158–175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2019.170945610.1080/10589759.2019.1709456 ↗
31. Vidya Sagar, R., Basu, D.J.: Damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures under elevated-amplitude cyclic loading using sentry values based on acoustic emission testing. Nondestr. Test. Eval. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2022.214485210.1080/10589759.2022.2144852 ↗
32. Prem, P.R., Verma, M., Ambily, P.: Damage characterization of reinforced concrete beams under different failure modes using acoustic emission. In: Structures, Vol. 30, pp. 174–187 (2021). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.00710.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.007 ↗
33. Grosse, C.U., Ohtsu, M., Aggelis, D.G., Shiotani, T.: Acoustic Emission Testing: Basics for Research-Applications in Engineering. Springer (2021). https://books.google.co.in/books10.1007/978-3-030-67936-1 ↗
34. Wang, H., Li, B., Xuan, F.Z.: Acoustic emission for in situ process monitoring of selective laser melting additive manufacturing based on machine learning and improved variational modal decomposition. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 122(5–6), 2277–2292 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10032-610.1007/s00170-022-10032-6 ↗
35. Xu, K., Lyu, J., Manoochehri, S.: In situ process monitoring using acoustic emission and laser scanning techniques based on machine learning models. J. Manuf. Process. 84, 357–374 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.00210.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.002 ↗
36. Liu, J., Kanwal, H., Tang, C., Hao, W.: Study on flexural properties of 3D printed lattice-reinforced concrete structures using acoustic emission and digital image correlation. Constr. Build. Mater. 333, 127418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12741810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127418 ↗
37. He, J., Feng, X., Wang, X., Guan, X.: Fatigue performance and acoustic emission behaviour of remanufactured low-carbon steel made by wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int. J. Fatigue 165, 107190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10719010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107190 ↗
38. Yoon, D.-J., Weiss, W.J., Shah, S.P.: Assessing damage in corroded reinforced concrete using acoustic emission. J. Eng. Mech. 126(3), 273–283 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:3(273)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:3(273) ↗
39. Wang, S., Wang, H., Wang, D., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Hong, J., Gao, L.: AE source localization and imaging on cylindrical shell structures based on six-AE-sensor monitoring network and VTR focusing imaging. Nondestr. Test. Eval. 36(1), 35–61 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2019.169201210.1080/10589759.2019.1692012 ↗
40. Behnia, A., Chai, H.K., Shiotani, T.: Advanced structural health monitoring of concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission. Constr. Build. Mater. 65, 282–302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.103 ↗
41. Acoustic Emission Sensors. Accessed on 15-Feburary-2022 https://www.vallen.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/sov.pdf.
42. Physical Acoustic- World Leader in Acoustic Emission. https://www.physicalacoustics.com/sensors/. Accessed 12-Dec-2021
43. Piezoelectric sensors group. http://www.fujicera.co.jp/en/product/ae/. Accessed 19 Jan-2022
44. Physical Acoustic- World Leader in Acoustic Emission. https://www.physicalacoustics.com/preamplifiers/. Accessed 12 Dec-2021
45. Grosse, C.U., Reinhardt, H.W., Finck, F.: Signal-based acoustic emission techniques in civil engineering. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 15(3), 274–279 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(274)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(274) ↗
46. Pomponi, E., Vinogradov, A.: A real-time approach to acoustic emission clustering. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 40(2), 791–804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.03.01710.1016/j.ymssp.2013.03.017 ↗
47. Prem, P.R., Murthy, A.R.: Acoustic emission and flexural behaviour of RC beams strengthened with UHPC overlay. Constr. Build. Mater. 123, 481–492 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.033 ↗
48. Jierula, A., Wang, S., Oh, T.M., Lee, J.W., Lee, J.H.: Detection of source locations in RC columns using machine learning with acoustic emission data. Eng. Struct. 246, 112992 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11299210.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112992 ↗
49. Boczar, T., Borucki, S., Jancarczyk, D., Bernas, M., Kurtasz, P.: Application of selected machine learning techniques for identification of basic classes of partial discharges occurring in paper-oil insulation measured by acoustic emission technique. Energies 15(14), 5013 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en1514501310.3390/en15145013 ↗
50. Saeedifar, M., Najafabadi, M.A., Zarouchas, D., Toudeshky, H.H., Jalalvand, M.: Clustering of interlaminar and intralaminar damages in laminated composites under indentation loading using Acoustic Emission. Composite B 144, 206–219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.028 ↗
51. Sun, J., Chen, X., Fu, Z., Lacidogna, G.: Damage pattern recognition and crack propagation prediction for crumb rubber concrete based on acoustic emission techniques. Appl. Sci. 11(23), 11476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11231147610.3390/app112311476 ↗
52. Manson, G., Worden, K., Holford, K., Pullin, R.: Visualisation and dimension reduction of acoustic emission data for damage detection. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 12(8), 529–536 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389012214537510.1177/10453890122145375 ↗
53. Rippengill, S., Worden, K., Holford, K.M., Pullin, R.: Automatic classification of acoustic emission patterns. Strain 39(1), 31–41 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00041.x10.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00041.x ↗
54. Ai, L., Soltangharaei, V., Ziehl, P.: Developing a heterogeneous ensemble learning framework to evaluate Alkali-silica reaction damage in concrete using acoustic emission signals. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 172, 108981 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10898110.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108981 ↗
55. Pichika, S.N., Meganaa, G., Rajasekharan, S.G., Malapati, A.: Multi-component fault classification of a wind turbine gearbox using integrated condition monitoring and hybrid ensemble method approach. Appl. Acoust. 195, 108814 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.10881410.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108814 ↗
56. Nguyen-Le, D.H., Tao, Q.B., Nguyen, V.H., Abdel-Wahab, M., Nguyen-Xuan, H.: A data-driven approach based on long short-term memory and hidden Markov model for crack propagation prediction. Eng. Fract. Mech. 235, 107085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10708510.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107085 ↗
57. Guo, W., Wu, C., Ding, Z., Zhou, Q.: Prediction of surface roughness based on a hybrid feature selection method and long short-term memory network in grinding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 112, 2853–2871 (2021)10.1007/s00170-020-06523-z ↗
58. Fu, W., Zhou, R., Guo, Z.: Automatic bolt tightness detection using acoustic emission and deep learning. In Structures (Vol. 55, pp. 1774–1782) (2023, September) Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.10010.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.100 ↗
59. Adeniji, D., Oligee, K., Schoop, J.: A novel approach for real-time quality monitoring in machining of aerospace alloy through acoustic emission signal transformation for DNN. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 6(1), 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp601001810.3390/jmmp6010018 ↗
60. Pashmforoush, F., Khamedi, R., Fotouhi, M., Hajikhani, M., Ahmadi, M.: Damage classification of sandwich composites using acoustic emission technique and k-means genetic algorithm. J. Nondestr. Eval. 33(4), 481–492 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-014-0243-y10.1007/s10921-014-0243-y ↗
61. Pashmforoush, F., Fotouhi, M., Ahmadi, M.: Acoustic emission-based damage classification of glass/polyester composites using harmony search k-means algorithm. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 31(10), 671–680 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441244225710.1177/0731684412442257 ↗
62. Kraljevski, I., Duckhorn, F., Tschöpe, C., Wolff, M.: Machine learning for anomaly assessment in sensor networks for NDT in aerospace. IEEE Sens. J. 21(9), 11000–11008 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.306294110.1109/JSEN.2021.3062941 ↗
63. Konig, F., Jacobs, G., Stratmann, A., Cornel, D.: Fault detection for sliding bearings using acoustic emission signals and machine learning methods. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012013) (2021, February). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1097/1/01201310.1088/1757-899X/1097/1/012013 ↗
64. Allen, R.: Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72(6B), 225–242 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA07206B022510.1785/BSSA07206B0225 ↗
65. Kurz, J.H., Grosse, C.U., Reinhardt, H.-W.: Strategies for reliable automatic onset time picking of acoustic emissions and of ultrasound signals in concrete. Ultrasonics 43(7), 538–546 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.00510.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.005 ↗
66. Jiang, J., Fu, Y.-F.: A short survey of sustainable material extrusion additive manufacturing. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2020.182504510.1080/14484846.2020.1825045 ↗
67. Ackland, D.C., Robinson, D., Redhead, M., Lee, P.V.S., Moskaljuk, A., Dimitroulis, G.: A personalized 3d-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint: from implant design to implantation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 69, 404–411 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.04810.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.048 ↗
68. Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., Radhakrishnan, P.: Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 118(1–3), 385–388 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3 ↗
69. Ahn, S.-H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., Wright, P.K.: Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping J. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
70. Rao, P.K., Liu, J.P., Roberson, D., Kong, Z.J., Williams, C.: Online real- time quality monitoring in additive manufacturing processes using heterogeneous sensors. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402982310.1115/1.4029823 ↗
71. Baumann, F., Roller, D.: Vision based error detection for 3D printing processes. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 59, p. 06003 (2016). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/2016590600310.1051/matecconf/20165906003 ↗
72. Yang, Z., Jin, L., Yan, Y., Mei, Y.: Filament breakage monitoring in fused deposition modelling using acoustic emission technique. Sensors 18(3), 749 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1803074910.3390/s18030749 ↗
73. Wu, H., Yu, Z., Wang, Y.: Real-time FDM machine condition monitoring and diagnosis based on acoustic emission and hidden semi-markov model. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90(5–8), 2027–2036 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9548-610.1007/s00170-016-9548-6 ↗
74. Lotrakul, P., San-Um, W., Takahashi, M.: The monitoring of three-dimensional printer filament feeding process using an acoustic emission sensor. In: Sustainability Through Innovation in Product Life Cycle Design, pp. 499–511. Springer (2017). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0471-1_3410.1007/978-981-10-0471-1_34 ↗
75. Wu, H., Wang, Y., Yu, Z.: In situ monitoring of FDM machine condition via acoustic emission. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 84(5–8), 1483–1495 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7809-410.1007/s00170-015-7809-4 ↗
76. Li, H., Yu, Z., Li, F., Kong, Q., Tang, J.: Real-time polymer flow state monitoring during fused filament fabrication based on acoustic emission. J. Manuf. Syst. 62, 628–635 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.01.00710.1016/j.jmsy.2022.01.007 ↗
77. Wu, H., Yu, Z., Wang, Y.: A new approach for online monitoring of additive manufacturing based on acoustic emission. In: International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, vol. 49910, pp. 003–08013 (2016). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2016-855110.1115/MSEC2016-8551 ↗
78. Liu, J., Hu, Y., Wu, B., Wang, Y.: An improved fault diagnosis approach for FDM process with acoustic emission. J. Manuf. Process. 35, 570–579 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.03810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.038 ↗
79. Li, F., Yu, Z., Shen, X., Zhang, H.: Status recognition for fused deposition modeling manufactured parts based on acoustic emission. In: E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 95, p. 01005 (2019). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019950100510.1051/e3sconf/20199501005 ↗
80. Wu, H., Yu, Z., Wang, Y.: Experimental study of the process failure diagnosis in additive manufacturing based on acoustic emission. Measurement 136, 445–453 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.06710.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.067 ↗
81. Yang, Z., Yan, W., Jin, L., Li, F., Hou, Z.: A novel feature representation method based on original waveforms for acoustic emission signals. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 135, 106365 (2020)10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106365 ↗
82. Barile, C., Casavola, C., Cazzato, A.: Acoustic emissions in 3D printed parts under mode in delamination test. Materials 11(9), 1760 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1109176010.3390/ma11091760 ↗
83. Yoon, J., He, D., Van Hecke, B.: A PHM approach to additive manufacturing equipment health monitoring, fault diagnosis, and quality control. In: Annual Conference of the PHM Society, Vol. 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2014.v6i1.233810.36001/phmconf.2014.v6i1.2338 ↗
84. Kim, J.S., Lee, C.S., Kim, S.-M., Lee, S.W.: Development of data-driven in-situ monitoring and diagnosis system of fused deposition modeling (FDM) process based on support vector machine algorithm. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 5(4), 479–486 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0051-410.1007/s40684-018-0051-4 ↗
85. Nam, J., Jo, N., Kim, J.S., Lee, S.W.: Development of a health monitoring and diagnosis framework for fused deposition modeling process based on a machine learning algorithm. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B 234(1–2), 324–332 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541985522410.1177/0954405419855224 ↗
86. Shevchik, S.A., Kenel, C., Leinenbach, C., Wasmer, K.: Acoustic emission for in situ quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using spectral convolutional neural networks. Addit. Manuf. 21, 598–604 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.01210.1016/j.addma.2017.11.012 ↗
87. Calignano, F., Manfredi, D., Ambrosio, E.P., Biamino, S., Lombardi, M., Atzeni, E., Salmi, A., Minetola, P., Iuliano, L., Fino, P.: Overview on additive manufacturing technologies. Proc. IEEE 105(4), 593–612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.262509810.1109/JPROC.2016.2625098 ↗
88. Khairallah, S.A., Anderson, A.T., Rubenchik, A., King, W.E.: Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater. 108, 36–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
89. McCann, R., Obeidi, M. A., Hughes, C., McCarthy, É., Egan, D. S., Vijayaraghavan, R. K.,. & Brabazon, D.: In-situ sensing, process monitoring and machine control in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: A review. Additive Manufacturing, 45, 102058 (2021) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860421002232.10.1016/j.addma.2021.102058 ↗
90. Zhang, M., Sun, C.-N., Zhang, X., Goh, P.C., Wei, J., Hardacre, D., Li, H.: Fatigue and fracture behaviour of laser powder bed fusion stainless steel 316L: Influence of processing parameters. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 703, 251–261 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.07110.1016/j.msea.2017.07.071 ↗
91. Wuriti, G.S., Chattopadhyaya, S., Thomas, T.: Acoustic emission signal characteristics of maraging steel 250 pressure vessel during a hydraulic qualification test. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 37(1), 100–114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2021.190901310.1080/10589759.2021.1909013 ↗
92. Ghayoomi Mohammadi, M.: Acoustic emission monitoring of the powder bed fusion process with machine learning approach. PhD thesis (2021). http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27064
93. Shevchik, S.A., Masinelli, G., Kenel, C., Leinenbach, C., Wasmer, K.: Deep learning for in situ and real-time quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using acoustic emission. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 15(9), 5194–5203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.291052410.1109/TII.2019.2910524 ↗
94. Wasmer, K., Kenel, C., Leinenbach, C., Shevchik, S.: In situ and real- time monitoring of powder-bed am by combining acoustic emission and artificial intelligence. In: International Conference on Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications, pp. 200–209 (2017). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_2010.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_20 ↗
95. Wasmer, K., Le-Quang, T., Meylan, B., Shevchik, S.: In situ quality monitoring in AM using acoustic emission: A reinforcement learning approach. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28(2), 666–672 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3690-210.1007/s11665-018-3690-2 ↗
96. Kratochvilova, V., Vlasic, F., Mazal, P., Palousek, D.: Fatigue behaviour evaluation of additively and conventionally produced materials by acoustic emission method. Procedia Structural Integrity 5, 393–400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.18710.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.187 ↗
97. Eschner, N., Weiser, L., Hafner, B., Lanza, G.: Development of an acoustic process monitoring system for selective laser melting (SLM). In: 2018 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (2018). University of Texas at Austin. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/1720510.26153/tsw/17205 ↗
98. Eschner, N., Weiser, L., Hafner, B., Lanza, G.: Classification of specimen density in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) using in-process structure- borne acoustic process emissions. Addit. Manuf. 34, 101324 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10132410.1016/j.addma.2020.101324 ↗
99. Pandiyan, V., Drissi-Daoudi, R., Shevchik, S., Masinelli, G., Log´e, R., Wasmer, K.: Analysis of time, frequency and time-frequency domain features from acoustic emissions during laser powder-bed fusion process. Procedia CIRP 94, 392–397 (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.15210.1016/j.procir.2020.09.152 ↗
100. Ye, D., Hong, G.S., Zhang, Y., Zhu, K., Fuh, J.Y.H., et al.: Defect detection in selective laser melting technology by acoustic signals with deep belief networks (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1728010.1007/s00170-018-17280 ↗