NDE 4.0—A Design Thinking Perspective
Source abstract
Abstract
Cyber technologies are offering new horizons for quality control in manufacturing and safety assurance in-service of physical assets. The line between non-destructive evaluation (NDE) and Industry 4.0 is getting blurred since both are sensory data-driven domains. This multidisciplinary approach has led to the emergence of a new capability: NDE 4.0. The NDT community is coming together once again to define the purpose, chart the process, and address the adoption of emerging technologies. In this paper, the authors have taken a design thinking approach to spotlight proper objectives for research on this subject. It begins with qualitative research on twenty different perceptions of stakeholders and misconceptions around the current state of NDE. The interpretation is used to define ten value propositions or use cases under 'NDE for Industry 4.0' and 'Industry 4.0 for NDE' leading up to the clarity of purpose for NDE 4.0-enhanced safety and economic value for stakeholders. To pursue this worthy cause, the paper delves into some of the top adoption challenges, and proposes a journey of managed innovation, conscious skills development, and a new form of leadership required to succeed in the cyber-physical world.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Educational Leadership and Innovation · Digital Transformation in Industry · The Impact of Diversity and Innovation on Society
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Kagermann, H., Lukas, W.-D.: Wahlster W (2011) Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution. VDI-Nachrichten 13, 2 (2011)
2. Vrana, J.: NDE perception and emerging reality: NDE 40 value extraction. Mater. Eval. 78(7), 835–851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.32548/2020.me-0413110.32548/2020.me-04131 ↗
3. Vrana, J.: ZfP 4.0: Die vierte Revolution der Zerstörungsfreien Prüfung: Schnittstellen, Vernetzung, Feedback, neue Märkte und Einbindung in die Digitale Fabrik. ZfP Zeitung 165, 51–59 (2019)
4. Vrana, J.: The Four Industrial Revolutions. YouTube. https://youtu.be/59SsqSWw4b0 (2020)
5. Dam, R.F., Siang, T.Y.: What is design thinking and why is it so popular? (2020) https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular (accessed 29 June 2020)
6. Brown, T.: Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1–10 (2008)
7. United States Air Force: Global Horizons Final Report. AF/ST TR 13-01 (2013)
8. Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M.: Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Bus. Horizons 62(1), 15–25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.00410.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004 ↗
9. Kluver, R.: Globalization, informatization, and intercultural communication. Am. Commun. J. 3(3) (2000)
10. Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., et al.: Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-510.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 ↗
11. Schrödinger, E.: Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 844–849 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0149198710.1007/BF01491987 ↗
12. Volz, J., Weber, M., Schlenk, D., Rosenfeld, W., Vrana, J., Saucke, K., Kurtsiefer, C., Weinfurter, H.: Observation of sm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(3), 030404 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.03040410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.030404 ↗
13. Meyendorf, N.G.H., Bond, L.J., Curtis-Beard, J., Heilmann, S., Pal, S., Schallert, R., Scholz, H., Wunderlich, C.: NDE 4.0—NDE for the 21st Century—the internet of things and cyber physical systems will revolutionize NDE. In: Proceedings of the 15th Asia Pacific Conference for Non-Destructive Testing (APCNDT 2017), Singapore (2017)
14. Link, R., Riess, N.: NDT 4.0—overall significance and implications to NDT. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (ECNDT 2018), Gothenburg (2018)
15. Singh, R.: NDE 4.0: the next revolution in nondestructive testing and evaluation: what and how? Mater. Eval. 77(1), 45–50 (2019)
16. Singh, R.: Purpose and pursuit of NDE 40. Mater. Eval. 78(7), 785–793 (2020). https://doi.org/10.32548/2020.me-0414310.32548/2020.me-04143 ↗
17. Chakraborty, D., McGovern, M.E.: NDE 4.0: smart NDE. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHM.2019.881942910.1109/ICPHM.2019.8819429 ↗
18. Vrana, J.: Welcome to the World of NDE 4.0. YouTube (2020). https://youtu.be/MzUKHmp4exE. Published: 24 March 2020
19. Vrana, J.: The four NDE revolutions. YouTube (2020). https://youtu.be/lvLfy4zfSYo. Published: 14 April 2020
20. Vrana, J., Kadau, K.: Amann C (2018) Smart data analysis of the results of ultrasonic inspections for probabilistic fracture mechanics. VGB PowerTech 7, 38–42 (2018)
21. Singh, R.: Three decades of NDT reliability assessment and demonstration. Mater. Eval. 59(7), 856–860 (2001)
22. Singh, R., Palumbo, D., Hewson, J., Locke, D., Paulk, M.D., Lewis, R.R.: A Design of Experiments for Human Factor Quantification in NDI Reliability Studies. USAF ASIP Conf, San Antonio (2001)
23. Virkkunen I, Koskinen T, Jessen-Juhler O, Rinta-aho J (2020) Augmented Ultrasonic Data for Machine Learning. arXiv:1903.1139910.1007/s10921-020-00739-5 ↗
24. Collins, J.: Good to Great. Harper Business, New York (2001)
25. Galloway, S.: The Four. Portfolio, New York (2017)
26. Sinek, S.: Start with Why. Portfolio, New York (2003)
27. ISO Standards: ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system—guidance (2019). https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.html