journal article·2024-12-13Open access

Smoothing and Cicatrization of Isotactic Polypropylene/Fe3O4 Nanocomposites via Magnetic Hyperthermia

Pablo Griffiths, Simon Fritz, Laura Ea, Florent Dalmas, Jérôme Adrien, Vivien Truchot, Françoise Méchin, Cyril Benoit, Fabien Dutertre, Jean-Charles Majesté, Niels Pernoux, Jérôme Grando, Jérôme Chevalier, Guilhem P. Baeza

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 6· Issue 23

Abstract

We prepare industrially relevant magnetoresponsive thermoplastic nanocomposites capable of being cicatrized and smoothed after additive manufacturing through the application of an oscillatory magnetic field (OMF). The materials are made of an isotactic polypropylene (iPP) matrix filled with magnetite nanoparticles (NPs; 2–22 wt %, 75 nm in diameter) synthesized from steel waste, providing them with a limited ecological impact on top of their ability to be repaired. NPs are found to have no significant impact on the thermal properties of iPP, which allows one to compare directly the magnetothermal effects measured on the different nanocomposites. Beyond the primary temperature increase generated by magnetic hysteresis loss, we show that the OMF irradiation triggers a second heating mechanism from the iPP melting. This phenomenon, which was assigned to NP magnetization and subsequent rotation causing high-frequency mechanical friction, is investigated here in a systematic way. Our results indicate that while the specific power generated by NP friction is (expectedly) proportional to the irradiation time, it is independent of the NP content as long as the temperature is well above the polymer melting point. These observations therefore suggest that the (local) filler–polymer interfacial rheology dictates the amount of heat generated through friction. From an application point of view, 7 wt % of the NPs is found to be enough to induce iPP melting from the magnetothermal effect, which enables the postprocessing of a hot-pressed and 3D-printed specimen through “cicatrization” and “smoothing” experiments. In the former case, rewelding a sample cut into two pieces is found to provide a Young modulus and a yield point similar to those in native hot-pressed samples (exhibiting, however, a lower strain at failure). In the latter case and beyond the improved specimen appearance, smoothing is found to double both the stress and strain at failure of large 3D-printed samples that present, nevertheless, significantly lower properties than those of their hot-pressed counterparts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5510, MATEIS, 69621 Villeurbanne, France

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, CNRS, UMR 5223, Ingénierie des Matériaux Polymères, F-69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, CNRS, UMR 5223, Ingénierie des Matériaux Polymères, F-42023 Saint-Etienne Cedex, France

Lines Manufacturing, 67810 Holtzheim, France

Plastic Omnium Intelligent Exterior System, 01150 Sainte-Julie, France

Funding

Minist?re de l'Enseignement sup?rieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation · Agence Nationale de la Recherche

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0666910.1038/nature06669 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1280610.1038/nature12806 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0220410.1021/acs.macromol.9b02204 ↗
4. 10.1122/1.500881710.1122/1.5008817 ↗
5. 10.1039/C8SM00044A10.1039/C8SM00044A ↗
6. 10.1021/cr500633b10.1021/cr500633b ↗
7. 10.1038/s41578-020-0202-410.1038/s41578-020-0202-4 ↗
8. 10.1002/admi.20180038410.1002/admi.201800384 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6PY01833E10.1039/C6PY01833E ↗
10. 10.1122/1.499760010.1122/1.4997600 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0235210.1021/acs.macromol.0c02352 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1507169610.3390/polym15071696 ↗
13. 10.1002/mame.20180040510.1002/mame.201800405 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20200632410.1002/adfm.202006324 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12488510.1016/j.polymer.2022.124885 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41565-018-0327-410.1038/s41565-018-0327-4 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0204610.1021/acs.macromol.1c02046 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20090194010.1002/adma.200901940 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.02410.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.024 ↗
20. 10.1038/srep1377310.1038/srep13773 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20110124310.1002/adfm.201101243 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.00610.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.006 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.355158210.1063/1.3551582 ↗
24. Coey J. M. · 2010
25. 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00145-610.1016/S0304-8853(99)00145-6 ↗
26. 10.1177/09673911120200040110.1177/096739111202000401 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c0025610.1021/acs.macromol.2c00256 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0544010.1021/acsnano.3c05440 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.08.03410.1016/j.jmmm.2012.08.034 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.05441610.1103/PhysRevB.107.054416 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12274-015-0734-x10.1007/s12274-015-0734-x ↗
32. 10.1039/C5NR07143G10.1039/C5NR07143G ↗
33. 10.2147/IJN.S14107210.2147/IJN.S141072 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.23710.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.237 ↗
35. Gallone T. · Field Actions Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 48
36. Brunet, F.; Crouzet, C.; Goffe, B. Method for producing nanomagnetite. U.S. Patent 10,843,935, 2020.
37. 10.3389/feart.2017.0008610.3389/feart.2017.00086 ↗
38. 10.1002/sia.590910.1002/sia.5909 ↗
39. Griffiths Alfaro, P. Magnetic induction healing of thermoplastic elastomer composites: Multi-physics characterization─Appendix B. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France, 2022.
40. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00345-010.1016/S0032-3861(98)00345-0 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.46487410.1063/1.464874 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.492805910.1063/1.4928059 ↗
43. 10.1038/nature1618910.1038/nature16189 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.03310.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.033 ↗
45. 10.1002/pol.1984.18022060810.1002/pol.1984.180220608 ↗
46. Mark J. E. · 2007 · 107610.1007/978-0-387-69002-5 ↗
47. Chase, M. W. NIST–JANAF Themochemical Tables, 4th ed. NIST–JANAF, 1998; pp 1–1951.
48. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.03.007 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10734110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.04910.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.049 ↗
51. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.05410.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.054 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.017 ↗
54. Ashby M. F. · 2013