journal article·2006-11Open access

Asymptotic description of schematic models for CKN

Matthias Sperl

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 352· Issue 42-49

Abstract

The fits of 0.4 Ca(NO_3)_2 0.6 K(NO_3) (CKN) by schematic mode-coupling models [V. Krakoviack and C. Alba-Simionesco, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 2161-2171 (2002)] are analyzed by asymptotic expansions. The validity of both the power-law and the Cole-Cole-peak solutions for the critical spectrum are investigated. It is found that the critical spectrum derived from the fits is described by both expansions equally well when both expansions are carried out up to next-to-leading order. The expansions up to this order describe the data for 373K over two orders of magnitude in frequency. In this regime an effective power law omega^a can be identified where the observed exponent $a$ is smaller than its calculated value by about 15%; this finding can be explained by corrections to the leading-order terms in the asymptotic expansions. For higher temperatures, even smaller effective exponents are caused by a crossover to the alpha-peak spectrum.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Thermodynamic properties of mixtures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Bengtzelius · J. Phys. C · 1984 · 17 · 591510.1088/0022-3719/17/33/005 ↗
2. Franosch · Phys. Rev. E · 1997 · 55 · 715310.1103/PhysRevE.55.7153 ↗
3. Götze · Z. Phys. B · 1984 · 56 · 13910.1007/BF01469695 ↗
4. Sjögren · Phys. Rev. A · 1986 · 33 · 125410.1103/PhysRevA.33.1254 ↗
5. Singh · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1998 · 235–237 · 6610.1016/S0022-3093(98)00583-3 ↗
6. Rufflé · Europhys. Lett. · 1999 · 45 · 59110.1209/epl/i1999-00208-x ↗
7. Götze · Phys. Rev. E · 2000 · 61 · 413310.1103/PhysRevE.61.4133 ↗
8. Brodin · Phys. Rev. E · 2002 · 65 · 05150310.1103/PhysRevE.65.051503 ↗
9. Wiebel · New J. Phys. · 2002 · 4 · 5610.1088/1367-2630/4/1/356 ↗
10. Cang · J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 123 · 06450810.1063/1.2000235 ↗
11. Hinze · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 243710.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2437 ↗
12. Cang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 19740110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.197401 ↗
13. Ricci · Philos. Mag. B · 2002 · 82 · 54110.1080/13642810208223143 ↗
14. Götze · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 10570110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.105701 ↗
15. Sperl · Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 74 · 01150310.1103/PhysRevE.74.011503 ↗
16. Buchalla · J. Phys. C · 1988 · 21 · 423910.1088/0022-3719/21/23/010 ↗
17. Götze · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1989 · 1 · 4183
18. Cummins · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · 1457
19. Li · Phys. Rev. A · 1992 · 45 · 386710.1103/PhysRevA.45.3867 ↗
20. Krakoviack · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 107 · 341710.1063/1.474484 ↗
21. Krakoviack · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 117 · 216110.1063/1.1489895 ↗
22. Alba-Simionesco · J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 102 · 657410.1063/1.469373 ↗
23. V. Krakoviack, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris XI Orsay (2000).
24. Surovtsev · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 1488810.1103/PhysRevB.58.14888 ↗
25. Gapinski · J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 110 · 231210.1063/1.477966 ↗
26. Barshilia · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 59 · 562510.1103/PhysRevE.59.5625 ↗
27. Cole · J. Chem. Phys. · 1941 · 9 · 34110.1063/1.1750906 ↗
28. Cummins · Phys. Rev. E · 1993 · 47 · 422310.1103/PhysRevE.47.4223 ↗