Fermionic lattice models and electronic correlations: Magnetism and superconductivity
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We consider the dimer approach to the generalized Hubbard model. As a first step we solve the dimer eigenvalue problem exactly. We decompose the dimer Hamiltonian HD into a set of commuting partial Hamiltonians H D ( α ) ( α = 1 , 2 , … , 16 ) ascribed to each dimer energy level where each H D ( α ) is represented in the second quantization. This procedure gives us a review of important two-site interactions, normally hidden in the original dimer Hamiltonian HD, several of them describing a competition between magnetism and superconductivity but belonging to different dimer energy levels. This feature is, however, a source of new problems discussed in the paper and connected with the practical use of the mean field approximation in the case of a real lattice. As a next step, we consider the decomposition of the real lattice into a set of interacting dimers to explicitly show that the competition between magnetism and superconductivity is a common feature of all electronic lattice models. This competition should be necessarily taken into account in practical calculations of the thermodynamics of such models.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum many-body systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Hubbard · Proc. Roy. Soc. A · 1963 · 276 · 238
2. Hubbard · Proc. Roy. Soc. A · 1964 · 281 · 401
3. Gutzwiller · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1963 · 10 · 5910.1103/PhysRevLett.10.159 ↗
4. Kanamori · Prog. Theor. Phys. · 1963 · 30 · 27510.1143/PTP.30.275 ↗
5. Moriya · 1985 · vol. 56
6. Fulde · 1995
7. Gebhard · 1997 · vol. 137
8. Anderson · Science · 1987 · 235 · 119610.1126/science.235.4793.1196 ↗
9. Baskaran · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 58010.1103/PhysRevB.37.580 ↗
10. Micnas · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1990 · 62 · 11310.1103/RevModPhys.62.113 ↗
11. Kulik · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1980 · 79 · 1469
12. Penson · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 33 · 166310.1103/PhysRevB.33.1663 ↗
13. Chao · J. Phys. C · 1977 · 10 · L27110.1088/0022-3719/10/10/002 ↗
14. Chao · Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) · 1977 · 84 · 74710.1002/pssb.2220840241 ↗
15. Chao · Phys. Rev. B · 1980 · 18 · 345310.1103/PhysRevB.18.3453 ↗
16. Spałek · Physica B · 1977 · 86–88 · 375
17. Spałek · J. Phys. C · 1980 · 13 · 524110.1088/0022-3719/13/28/011 ↗
18. Matlak · Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) · 1980 · 99 · K8710.1002/pssb.2220990242 ↗
19. Park · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 18451010.1103/PhysRevB.64.184510 ↗
20. Lieb · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1968 · 20 · 144510.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1445 ↗
21. Klümper · Europhys. Lett. · 1993 · 24 · 29310.1209/0295-5075/24/4/010 ↗
22. Strack · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 70 · 263710.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2637 ↗
23. de Boer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 429810.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4298 ↗
24. Montorsi · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 53 · 515310.1103/PhysRevB.53.5153 ↗
25. Szabo · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 1000710.1103/PhysRevB.59.10007 ↗
26. Dziurdzik · Eur. Phys. J. B · 1999 · 12 · 109
27. Beccaria · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2000 · 14 · 52310.1007/s100510051061 ↗
28. Grabiec · Acta Phys. Polon. A · 2002 · 101 · 53710.12693/APhysPolA.101.537 ↗
29. Matlak · Ann. Phys. · 2003 · 12 · 30410.1002/andp.20035150504 ↗
30. Carter · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 04510710.1103/PhysRevB.70.045107 ↗
31. Matlak · Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) · 2005 · 242 · 31710.1002/pssb.200460051 ↗
32. Bimberg · 1999
33. Loos · Phys. Rev. A · 1998 · 57 · 12010.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 ↗
34. Martin · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2003 · 256 · 44910.1016/S0304-8853(02)00898-3 ↗
35. Baletto · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2004 · 76 · 371