Domain structure, microscopic segregation and dynamics heterogeneity in alumina-silicate liquid
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We report molecular dynamics simulation for SiO2.Al2O3 liquid. The result shows that the system contains small TO-subnets (T is Si or Al) and two large ones consisting of 18 - 35% of total atoms. The average size of SiO-subnets is larger than AlO-subnets, and T-O-T angle distribution is quite different for three O types. The microscopic segregation occurs with formation of three distinct domains, whose number density is 57, 67 and 69 atom/nm3. Diffusion proceeds by collective movements without and with exchange of coordinated atoms. The exchange of coordinated atoms gives the major contribution. During 300 ps, there are Si-rich and Al-rich regions, where immobile and mobile O resides respectively. By examining atom's flow through a fixed cubic lattice we find that the system contains immobile and mobile regions where the atom flow significantly differs from each other. The dynamic heterogeneity is related to non-uniform spatial distribution of bond breaking-reforming.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Glass properties and applications · Clay minerals and soil interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Coslovich · J. Phys.: Condens. Matt · 2009 · 21
2. Le Losq · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2014 · 126 · 49510.1016/j.gca.2013.11.010 ↗
3. Drewitt · J. Phys.: Condens. Matt. · 2015 · 27
4. Meyer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 9
5. Angell · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1988 · 49 · 86310.1016/0022-3697(88)90002-9 ↗
6. Wang · Nat.Commun · 2014 · 5 · 324110.1038/ncomms4241 ↗
7. Olga · J. Non-Cryst. Sol. · 2013 · 375 · 6210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.04.060 ↗
8. Davis · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1972 · 55 · 52510.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb13421.x ↗
9. Aksay · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1979 · 62 · 33310.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19071.x ↗
10. Morikawa · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1982 · 65 · 7810.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10361.x ↗
11. Poe · J. Phys. Chem. · 1992 · 96 · 822010.1021/j100200a005 ↗
12. Pole · Chem. Geol. · 1992 · 96 · 33310.1016/0009-2541(92)90063-B ↗
13. Xue · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 1081610.1021/jp992108a ↗
14. Hoang · Phys. Lett. A · 2007 · 368 · 49910.1016/j.physleta.2007.04.050 ↗
15. V.V. Hoang, Physica B, 400 (2007) 278-286.10.1016/j.physa.2007.02.046 ↗
16. Pfleiderer · Chem. Geol. · 2006 · 229 · 18610.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.01.020 ↗
17. Winkler · J. Chem. Phys · 2004 · 120 · 38410.1063/1.1630562 ↗
18. Vinh · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2020 · 2810.1088/1361-651X/ab6ec6 ↗
19. Krishnan · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2000 · 83 · 277710.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01630.x ↗
20. Wilding · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 574210.1021/jp907587e ↗
21. Okuno · J. Non-Cryst. Sol. · 2005 · 351 · 103210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.01.014 ↗
22. Ohira · Geochem. Persp. Let. · 2019 · 10 · 4110.7185/geochemlet.1913 ↗
23. Weber · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 1672610.1021/jp807964u ↗
24. Kim · J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 138
25. Szamel · Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 7410.1103/PhysRevE.74.021507 ↗
26. Lacevic · Phys. Rev. E · 2002 · 6610.1103/PhysRevE.66.030101 ↗
27. Donati · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2002 · 307–310 · 21510.1016/S0022-3093(02)01461-8 ↗
28. Winkler · J. Chem. Phys · 2004 · 120 · 38410.1063/1.1630562 ↗
29. Bouhadja · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2020 · 32
30. Sarnthein · R. Car, Phys. Rev. Lett · 1995 · 74 · 468210.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4682 ↗
31. Dove · Phys. Chem. Minerals · 1997 · 24 · 31110.1007/s002690050043 ↗
32. R.D. Shannon, C.T. Prewitt, Acta Cryst. B25 (1969) 925.10.1107/S0567740869003220 ↗
33. Benoit · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 6410.1103/PhysRevB.64.224205 ↗
34. Mauri · Pfrommer, Phys. Rev. B. · 2000 · 62
35. Jakse · Appl. Phys. Lett · 2012 · 10110.1063/1.4766920 ↗
36. Zheng · ISIJ International · 2012 · 52 · 34210.2355/isijinternational.52.342 ↗
37. Xiang · J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 139