Effect of finishing methods on surface roughness and color stability in all-ceramic systems
Source abstract
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effect of the finishing methods on the surface roughness, and to investigate changes in CIE L* a* b* color coordinates of all-ceramic systems after different finishing methods and accelerated aging. Sixty specimens were prepared, 20 specimens each for Vitadur-N, IPS Empress II, and Cerec Vita Block Mark II. The surface roughness ( Ra) following treatment with the different finishing methods was measured using a profilometer. Surface examinations in all groups were made by using a scanning electronic microscope. CIE L* a* b* values of the specimens were determined. After all specimens were subjected to accelerated aging, color measurements were repeated, and the total color differences (Δ E) were calculated. Data were analyzed statistically. Significant differences in surface roughness among all-ceramics were found ( P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the surface roughness of the glazed and polished all-ceramics ( P > 0.05). After accelerated aging, all groups had acceptable color changes (Δ E < 2).
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Gemalmaz · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 2002 · 87 · 18910.1067/mpr.2002.120653 ↗
2. Sungkoo J, Hittelman E10.1067/mpr.2002.129803 ↗
3. Berns · 2000 · 31
4. Sproull · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 1973 · 29 · 41610.1016/S0022-3913(73)80019-8 ↗
5. Hunter · 1987 · 178
6. Rosenstiel · 1995 · 490
7. Heydecke · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 2001 · 85 · 55110.1067/mpr.2001.115385 ↗
8. O'Brien · J. Dent. Res. · 1990 · 69 · 176210.1177/00220345900690111001 ↗
9. Jager · Dent. Mater. · 2000 · 16 · 38110.1016/S0109-5641(00)00030-0 ↗
10. Albakry · J. Dent. · 2003 · 31 · 18110.1016/S0300-5712(03)00025-3 ↗
11. Taylor DF10.1016/0022-3913(71)90191-0 ↗
12. Kawai · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 2000 · 83 · 66410.1067/mpr.2000.107442 ↗
13. Yap · J. Oral Rehabil. · 1998 · 25 · 45610.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00253.x ↗
14. Obregon · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 1981 · 46 · 33010.1016/0022-3913(81)90222-5 ↗
15. Lee · J. Oral Rehabil. · 2001 · 28 · 45710.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00717.x ↗
16. Kim · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2003 · 14 · 40510.1023/A:1023206716774 ↗
17. Schweiger · Quintessence Dent. Technol. · 1999 · 22 · 143
18. Sorensen · Quintessence Dent. Technol. · 1999 · 22 · 153
19. Smith · Rest Dent. · 1989 · 5 · 60
20. Anusavice · 1996 · 583
21. Deany · Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. · 1996 · 7 · 13410.1177/10454411960070020201 ↗
22. Krejci · Quintessence Int. · 1994 · 25 · 199
23. Sarac · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 2006 · 96 · 12210.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.009 ↗
24. Chroma Meters CR-300/CR-310/CR-331 working instructions. Minolta Camera Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan, 1991.
25. Kern · J. Oral Rehabil. · 1999 · 26 · 37210.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00416.x ↗
26. Powers · J. Dent. Res. · 1978 · 57 · 96410.1177/00220345780570111101 ↗
27. Powers · J. Dent. Res. · 1980 · 59 · 207110.1177/00220345800590120801 ↗
28. Douglas · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 2000 · 83 · 16610.1016/S0022-3913(00)80008-6 ↗
29. Bessing · Scand. J. Dent. Res. · 1983 · 91 · 482
30. Martinez-Gomis · Int. J. Prosthodont. · 2003 · 16 · 74
31. Goldstein · J. Prosthet. Dent. · 1991 · 65 · 62710.1016/0022-3913(91)90196-4 ↗