The defect diffusion model, scaling, E*/H* and monomer volume and correlation lengths for glass-formers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Four topics are treated within the framework of the defect diffusion model (DDM). First, it is shown how the relationship between E V */ H* (ratio of the apparent isochoric activation energy to the isobaric activation enthalpy) and monomer volume for polymers that has been pointed out by Floudas and co-workers [G. Floudas, K. Mpoukouvalas and P. Papadopoulos, J. Chem. Phys. 124 (2006) 074905] is predicted. Next, it is shown that in the DDM, scaling arises because the critical temperature can be represented approximately by a power law. Consequently, in the DDM scaling is always approximate and significant departures from scaling, as is observed in the case of hydrogen bonded materials for example, are matters of degree. It is also shown how the connection of scaling with E V */ H* is a natural consequence of the DDM. Finally, DDM calculations of the defect correlation length are carried out and compared with experimental dynamical correlation lengths measured using the 4D3CP solid state NMR method.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Glass properties and applications · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Naoki · J. Phys. Chem. · 1987 · 91 · 406910.1021/j100299a044 ↗
2. Roland · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 491010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.152 ↗
3. Floudas · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 124 · 07490510.1063/1.2170074 ↗
4. Dlubek · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 02490610.1063/1.2406077 ↗
5. Roland · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2005 · 68 · 140510.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R03 ↗
6. Bendler · 2008 · Volume 982 · 215
7. Bendler · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2010 · 356 · 54710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.03.012 ↗
8. Tracht · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 272710.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2727 ↗
9. Tracht · J. Magn. Reson. · 1999 · 140 · 46010.1006/jmre.1999.1854 ↗
10. Reinsberg · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 114 · 729910.1063/1.1369160 ↗
11. Reinsberg · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2002 · 307–310 · 20810.1016/S0022-3093(02)01460-6 ↗
12. Qiu · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 45910.1021/jp021888b ↗
13. Bendler · Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 71 · 03150810.1103/PhysRevE.71.031508 ↗
14. Bendler · J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 118 · 671310.1063/1.1566433 ↗
15. Bendler · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 483510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.176 ↗
16. Kohlrausch · Prog. Ann. Phys. · 1847 · 12 · 393
17. Williams · Trans. Faraday Soc. · 1970 · 66 · 8010.1039/tf9706600080 ↗
18. Bendler · Electrochim. Acta · 2004 · 49 · 524910.1016/j.electacta.2004.06.033 ↗
19. Vogel · Phys. Z. · 1921 · 22 · 645
20. Tamman · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. · 1926 · 156 · 24510.1002/zaac.19261560121 ↗
21. Fulcher · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1925 · 8 · 33910.1111/j.1151-2916.1925.tb16731.x ↗
22. Bendler · J. Stat. Phys. · 1988 · 53 · 53110.1007/BF01011571 ↗
23. Bendler · J. Phys. Chem. · 1992 · 96 · 397010.1021/j100189a012 ↗
24. Stickel · J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 102 · 625110.1063/1.469071 ↗
25. Barker · 1963 · 36
26. Reiser · Europhys. Lett. · 2006 · 76 · 113710.1209/epl/i2006-10401-5 ↗
27. Alba-Simionesco · Europhys. Lett. · 2004 · 68 · 5810.1209/epl/i2004-10214-6 ↗
28. Dreyfus · Eur. J. Phys. · 2004 · 42 · 30910.1140/epjb/e2004-00386-3 ↗
29. Heinrich · Colloid Polym. Sci. · 1985 · 263 · 87310.1007/BF01469623 ↗
30. Mpoukouvalas · Polymer · 2006 · 47 · 717010.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.068 ↗
31. Simon · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. · 1929 · 178 · 30910.1002/zaac.19291780123 ↗
32. Reiser · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 09420410.1103/PhysRevB.72.094204 ↗
33. Roland · Macromolecules · 2003 · 36 · 136110.1021/ma025791z ↗
34. Roland · J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 122 · 13450510.1063/1.1863173 ↗
35. Kudlich · J. Mol. Liq. · 1999 · 479 · 201
36. Fisher · J. Math. Phys. · 1964 · 5 · 94410.1063/1.1704197 ↗
37. Equation (6) was best-fit to the dielectric relaxation data over the temperature range 260 K to 276 K10.1063/1.1674335 ↗
38. Wagner · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 407110.1021/jp9838947 ↗
39. Equation (6) was best-fit over the temperature range 259 to 271 K