journal article·2015-01

Understanding the structure of molecular liquids via combinations of molecular dynamics simulations and Reverse Monte Carlo modeling: Handling information deficiency

Orsolya Gereben, László Pusztai

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The problem of information deficiency, i.e., when the number of available diffraction (and/or EXAFS) experiments is (in many cases, much) lower than the number of partial radial distribution function in the system, is considered, with a focus on molecular liquids. Two approaches, both relying heavily on Reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) modeling [R.L. McGreevy, L. Pusztai, Molec. Simul. 1, 359 (1988)] are sketched: (1) molecular dynamics simulation, followed by RMC modeling (‘RMCMD’), and (2) RMC modeling that incorporates the extensive use of interatomic potential functions (‘RMC_POT’). We show that applying either method is useful, although the ‘RMCMD’ is restricted to smaller molecules. With larger molecules, the molecular structure begins to dominate the measurable total scattering structure factor and therefore, Reverse Monte Carlo is expected to play a more and more important role in conformational analyses in the liquid state.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Narten · J. Chem. Phys. · 1967 · 46 · 487510.1063/1.1840650 ↗
2. Egelstaff · Mol. Phys. · 1971 · 20 · 88110.1080/00268977100100851 ↗
3. Egelstaff · 1994
4. Squires · 1978
5. Nield · 2001
6. Fisher · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2006 · 69 · 23310.1088/0034-4885/69/1/R05 ↗
7. Ladd · 1977
8. McGreevy · Mol. Simul. · 1988 · 1 · 35910.1080/08927028808080958 ↗
9. Allen · 1987
10. Pusztai · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 457 · 9610.1016/j.cplett.2008.03.091 ↗
11. Pusztai · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 129 · 18410310.1063/1.2976578 ↗
12. Mile · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 1076010.1021/jp900092g ↗
13. Gereben · J. Comput. Chem. · 2012 · 33 · 228510.1002/jcc.23058 ↗
14. Keen · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2001 · 34 · 17210.1107/S0021889800019993 ↗
15. McGreevy · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1990 · 430 · 221
16. McGreevy · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2001 · 13 · R87710.1088/0953-8984/13/46/201 ↗
17. Evrard · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · S110.1088/0953-8984/17/5/001 ↗
18. Gereben · J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 9 · 3021
19. Howe · Phys. Chem. Liq. · 1991 · 24 · 110.1080/00319109108030643 ↗
20. Gereben · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1413610.1103/PhysRevB.50.14136 ↗
21. Pusztai · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 1998 · 10 · 52510.1088/0953-8984/10/3/006 ↗
22. Pusztai · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 1185110.1103/PhysRevB.60.11851 ↗
23. Pusztai · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 2810.1103/PhysRevB.61.28 ↗
24. Gereben · Phys. Scr. · 1994 · T57 · 69
25. Howe · Mol. Phys. · 1990 · 69 · 16110.1080/00268979000100111 ↗
26. Pusztai · Mol. Phys. · 1997 · 90 · 53310.1080/00268979709482635 ↗
27. Jóvári · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 114 · 808210.1063/1.1355998 ↗
28. Pusztai · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 125 · 04450810.1063/1.2208609 ↗
29. Pardo · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 13420310.1103/PhysRevB.76.134203 ↗
30. Morita · J. Mol. Liq. · 2009 · 147 · 18210.1016/j.molliq.2009.03.007 ↗
31. Pothoczki · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130 · 06450310.1063/1.3073051 ↗
32. Pothoczki · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 16451110.1063/1.3418444 ↗
33. Pothoczki · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 134 · 04425110.1063/1.3517087 ↗
34. Pothoczki · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 01420210.1103/PhysRevB.85.014202 ↗
35. Temleitner · J. Mol. Liq. · 2014 · 197 · 20410.1016/j.molliq.2014.05.011 ↗
36. Dove · Eur. J. Mineral. · 2002 · 14 · 33110.1127/0935-1221/2002/0014-0331 ↗
37. Temleitner · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 13410110.1103/PhysRevB.81.134101 ↗
38. Pothoczki · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25 · 45421610.1088/0953-8984/25/45/454216 ↗
39. Kohara · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2012 · 706–709 · 169010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.706-709.1690 ↗
40. Rey · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 16450610.1063/1.2720840 ↗
41. Rey · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 34410.1021/jp0754177 ↗
42. Rovira-Esteva · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 06420210.1103/PhysRevB.84.064202 ↗
43. Gereben · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 911410.1021/jp3040117 ↗
44. Henao · J. Mol. Liq. · 2014 · 190 · 12110.1016/j.molliq.2013.10.030 ↗
45. Soper · Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 202 · 29510.1016/0301-0104(95)00357-6 ↗
46. Soper · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 10420410.1103/PhysRevB.72.104204 ↗
47. Steinczinger · Condens. Matter Phys. · 2013 · 16 · 4360410.5488/CMP.16.43604 ↗
48. Mile · J. Mol. Liq. · 2010 · 157 · 3510.1016/j.molliq.2010.08.003 ↗
49. Mile · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 975810.1021/jp301595m ↗
50. Gereben · J. Mol. Liq. · 2012 · 169 · 6310.1016/j.molliq.2012.02.018 ↗
51. Thomas · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 1294110.1021/jp076501p ↗
52. van der Spoel · J. Comput. Chem. · 2005 · 26 · 170110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
53. Jorgensen · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 1122510.1021/ja9621760 ↗
54. Gereben · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25 · 45420110.1088/0953-8984/25/45/454201 ↗
55. Levitt · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1995 · 91 · 21510.1016/0010-4655(95)00049-L ↗
56. Page · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2000 · 104 · 667210.1021/jp001561f ↗
57. Kolano-Burian · J. Alloys Compd. · 2014