journal article·2003-04

Effect of substrate conductivity on infrared reflection spectra of thin TiO2 films

G. Scarel, C.R. Aita, A.V. Sklyarov

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 318· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract S- and p-polarized middle infrared reflection spectra of a 0.25 μm thick TiO 2 film on silicon are measured with beam angle of incidence of φ =45° and 75°. An inversion of the absorption band related to the high frequency maximum of the loss function −1/Im[ ϵ ( ν )] of TiO 2 occurs while changing φ in the spectra measured using a p-polarized infrared beam. This inversion does not take place for TiO 2 films grown on aluminum. The phenomenon is studied calculating the spectra with Fresnel and Fuchs–Kliewer reflection coefficients. The former considers real substrates with finite and non-zero conductivity, while the latter considers ideal substrates with infinite and zero conductivity. Our study shows that the effect of the damping factor of the ion oscillations in TiO 2 has to be taken into account to explain the observed phenomenon. We conclude that the inversion of the absorption band related to the high frequency maximum of the loss function −1/Im[ ϵ ( ν )] of TiO 2 is due to the finite but low conductivity of the silicon substrate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Yen · J. Phys. Chem. · 1989 · 93 · 720810.1021/j100357a036 ↗
2. Wong · Appl. Spectrosc. · 1988 · 42 · 59810.1366/0003702884429175 ↗
3. Yamamoto · Vib. Spectrosc. · 1994 · 8 · 110.1016/0924-2031(94)00022-9 ↗
4. Brunner · Appl. Spectrosc. · 1997 · 51 · 20910.1366/0003702971940143 ↗
5. Vallant · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 104 · 530910.1021/jp000006a ↗
6. Parikh · J. Chem. Phys. · 1992 · 96 · 92710.1063/1.462847 ↗
7. Mielczarski · J. Phys. Chem. · 1993 · 97 · 264910.1021/j100113a029 ↗
8. Ishikawa · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 407610.1063/1.370313 ↗
9. D.L. Allara, private communication
10. Schubert · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 1330610.1103/PhysRevB.56.13306 ↗
11. Edwards · 1985
12. Jackson · 1998
13. DeLoach · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 237710.1063/1.369553 ↗
14. Yakovlev · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 110710.1063/1.125953 ↗
15. Hansen · J. Opt. Soc. Am. · 1968 · 58 · 38010.1364/JOSA.58.000380 ↗
16. Fuchs · Phys. Rev. · 1966 · 150 · 58910.1103/PhysRev.150.589 ↗
17. Grosse · Appl. Phys. A · 1986 · 39 · 25710.1007/BF00617270 ↗
18. A. Aoki, H. Tanaka, K. Hisano, in: Proc. 12th Japan Symposium on Thermophy. Prop. A, vol. 103, 1991, p. 9
19. Scarel · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2002 · 303 · 5010.1016/S0022-3093(02)00963-8 ↗
20. Gonzalez · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 55 · 701410.1103/PhysRevB.55.7014 ↗
21. Kurosawa · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1962 · 16 · 129810.1143/JPSJ.16.1298 ↗
22. Berreman · Phys. Rev. · 1968 · 174 · 79110.1103/PhysRev.174.791 ↗
23. G. Scarel, PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2001
24. Berreman · Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 130 · 219310.1103/PhysRev.130.2193 ↗