journal article·2008-01

High nonlinear optical properties in TeO2-based glasses: A modifier’s influence study from the localized hyperpolarizability approach

O. Noguera, S. Suehara

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 354· Issue 2-9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Ab initio localized molecular orbital theory (GAMESS program) has been used to evaluate the effects of a second cation on nonlinear optical properties of tellurium oxide based glasses. Calculations were performed on [H n TeO 3 A 3− n ] + ( n = 0–3) molecules with alkali cations (A = Li, Na). Results of the calculations on optimized structures show that the effects of the second cation on the nonlinear optical properties are significant and related to the geometric modification of the structural unit. However, the introduction of the second cation induces an increase of both linear polarizability and second hyperpolarizabilty whereas experiments show the opposite, second hyperpolarizabilty is much more affected by the introduction of the second cation. Such calculations have to be performed on bigger size clusters in which the introduction of a second cation implies breaking a Te–O–Te bridge.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Research · Crystal Structures and Properties · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. El-Mallawany · 2002
2. Noguera · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 09420310.1103/PhysRevB.68.094203 ↗
3. Kim · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1993 · 76 · 86510.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb05307.x ↗
4. Kim · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1995 · 78 · 106110.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08437.x ↗
5. Fargin · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1996 · 203 · 9610.1016/0022-3093(96)00338-9 ↗
6. Uchino · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1996 · 204 · 24310.1016/S0022-3093(96)00423-1 ↗
7. Uchino · J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. · 1997 · 105 · 20110.2109/jcersj.105.201 ↗
8. Nida · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 114 · 45910.1063/1.1328417 ↗
9. Suehara · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 20512110.1103/PhysRevB.70.205121 ↗
10. Noguera · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2004 · 345&346 · 73410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.08.192 ↗
11. Mirgorodsky · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 13420610.1103/PhysRevB.73.134206 ↗
12. Schmidt · J. Comput. Chem. · 1993 · 14 · 134710.1002/jcc.540141112 ↗
13. Becke · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 564810.1063/1.464913 ↗
14. Lee · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
15. Vosko · Can. J. Phys. · 1980 · 58 · 120010.1139/p80-159 ↗
16. Hertwig · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 268 · 34510.1016/S0009-2614(97)00207-8 ↗
17. Cundari · J. Phys. Chem. A · 1998 · 102 · 296210.1021/jp980438+ ↗
18. Karna · J. Chem. Phys. · 1990 · 92 · 741810.1063/1.458227 ↗
19. Karna · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 171 · 20110.1016/0009-2614(90)85227-4 ↗
20. Stevens · J. Chem. Phys. · 1984 · 81 · 602610.1063/1.447604 ↗
21. Stevens · Can. J. Phys. · 1992 · 70 · 612
22. Cundari · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 555510.1063/1.464902 ↗
23. Dupuis · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1992 · 52 · 41510.1016/0010-4655(89)90116-1 ↗
24. Edmiston · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1963 · 35 · 45710.1103/RevModPhys.35.457 ↗
25. Hensen · J. Phys. Chem. · 1995 · 99 · 809110.1021/j100020a037 ↗
26. Burns · 1985
27. Mills · 1998