Growth of heavy ion-induced nanodots at the SiO2–Si interface: Correlation with ultrathin gate oxide reliability
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Scaling-down the oxide thickness induces weakness influencing its intrinsic reliability. Even unbiased, swift heavy ions irradiated devices clearly show oxide alteration. Despite numerous studies on oxide reliability, some results are not yet well understood. In this paper, we focus on the structural degradation induced in thin silicon oxide films on silicon substrate after a 210 MeV low fluence gold ion irradiation and on its effect on the reliability of MOS devices in radiation-harsh environments. We describe such degradation as a local silicon growth in the SiO 2 layer, near the SiO 2 –Si interface. Experimental results can bring some emergent elements to explain earlier works in the field of oxide reliability. Based on the specific behavior of heavy ion-irradiated oxides, this paper aims to link together thermal spike model, heavy ion-induced nanodots and reliability of ultrathin gate oxides. We propose to evaluate the possible sensitivity of some high- k materials in radiation-harsh environments with respect to their thermal conductivity property.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Wilson · Proc. R. Soc. London, Series-A · 1912 · 87 · 27710.1098/rspa.1912.0081 ↗
2. Hahn · Naturwissenschaften · 1939 · 27 · 54410.1007/BF01495447 ↗
3. Joliot · CR Acad. Sci. II · 1939 · 208 · 647
4. Corson · Phys. Rev. · 1939 · 55 · 50910.1103/PhysRev.55.509 ↗
5. Brostrom · Phys. Rev. · 1940 · 58 · 65110.1103/PhysRev.58.651 ↗
6. Young · Nature · 1958 · 182 · 37510.1038/182375a0 ↗
7. Fleischer · J. Appl. Phys. · 1963 · 34 · 290310.1063/1.1729828 ↗
8. Fleischer · Science · 1963 · 140 · 122110.1126/science.140.3572.1221 ↗
9. Price · J. Appl. Phys. · 1962 · 33 · 340710.1063/1.1702421 ↗
10. Price · J. Appl. Phys. · 1962 · 33 · 262510.1063/1.1729031 ↗
11. Suehle · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 128210.1063/1.1448859 ↗
12. J.F. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack, U. Littmark, Pergamon, New York, 1985.
13. Brinkman · J. Appl. Phys. · 1954 · 25 · 96110.1063/1.1721810 ↗
14. Fleischer · MRS Bull. · 1995 · 20 · 1710.1557/S0883769400045851 ↗
15. R.L. Fleischer, P.B. Price, R.M. Walker, University of California, Berkeley, 1975.
16. Kaganov · Sov. Phys. JETP-USSR · 1957 · 4 · 173
17. Dienes · Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. · 1953 · 2 · 18710.1146/annurev.ns.02.120153.001155 ↗
18. Toulemonde · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 2004 · 216 · 110.1016/j.nimb.2003.11.013 ↗
19. Bonfiglioli · J. Appl. Phys. · 1961 · 32 · 249910.1063/1.1728339 ↗
20. Dartyge · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 521310.1103/PhysRevB.23.5213 ↗
21. K. Izui, S. Furuno, in: Proc. XIth Int. Cong. on Electron Microscopy Kyoto (1986) p. 1299.
22. Chaudhari · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 348610.1063/1.1542913 ↗
23. Cester · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 133610.1063/1.1398329 ↗
24. M. Porti, M. Nafria, X. Aymerich, et al., in: Proc. of RADECS Int. Conf. (2004) p. 17.
25. Sexton · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 1997 · 44 · 234510.1109/23.659060 ↗
26. Johnston · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 1998 · 45 · 250010.1109/23.736491 ↗
27. Conley · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2001 · 48 · 191310.1109/23.983150 ↗
28. Ceschia · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2000 · 47 · 56610.1109/23.856481 ↗
29. Suñé · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 95910.1063/1.124566 ↗
30. Toulemonde · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 2004 · 216 · 110.1016/j.nimb.2003.11.013 ↗
31. Awazu · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 368910.1103/PhysRevB.62.3689 ↗
32. Toulemonde · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 1990 · 46 · 6410.1016/0168-583X(90)90670-P ↗
33. Merkle · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1962 · 9 · 15010.1103/PhysRevLett.9.150 ↗
34. Meftah · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 1991 · 59&60 · 60510.1016/0168-583X(91)95286-M ↗