A plausible interpretation of the density scaling of the diffusivity in viscous liquids
Source abstract
Abstract
Fundamental thermodynamic concepts and an earlier elastic solid-state point defect model are employed to formulate an analytical second-order olynomial function describing the density scaling of the diffusion coefficient in viscous liquids. The scaling exponent is correlated, within the approximations made in the present approach, with the pressure derivative of the isothermal bulk modulus. Our findings are compared with computer simulation results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Thermodynamic properties of mixtures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Dyre · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 20510510.1088/0953-8984/19/20/205105 ↗
2. Dyre · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2006 · 78 · 95310.1103/RevModPhys.78.953 ↗
3. Casalini · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 125 · 01450510.1063/1.2206582 ↗
4. Roland · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2005 · 68 · 140510.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R03 ↗
5. Dyre · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 463510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.173 ↗
6. Dyre · Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 72 · 01150110.1103/PhysRevE.72.011501 ↗
7. Varotsos · J. Phys. C: Solid State · 1979 · 12 · L76110.1088/0022-3719/12/19/004 ↗
8. Dreyfus · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2004 · 42 · 30910.1140/epjb/e2004-00386-3 ↗
9. Casalini · Phys. Rev. E · 2004 · 69 · 06250110.1103/PhysRevE.69.062501 ↗
10. Tarjus · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2000 · 12 · 649710.1088/0953-8984/12/29/321 ↗
11. Alba-Simionesco · Europhys. Lett. · 2004 · 68 · 5810.1209/epl/i2004-10214-6 ↗
12. C.M. Roland; private communication.
13. Coslovich · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 132910.1021/jp710457e ↗
14. Pedersen · Phys. Rev. E · 2008 · 77 · 01120110.1103/PhysRevE.77.011201 ↗
15. Papathanassiou · Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 79 · 03250110.1103/PhysRevE.79.032501 ↗
16. Avramov · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2000 · 262 · 25810.1016/S0022-3093(99)00712-7 ↗
17. Roland · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 489510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.149 ↗
18. Roland · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 20511810.1088/0953-8984/19/20/205118 ↗
19. Varotsos · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 17210710.1103/PhysRevB.75.172107 ↗
20. Roland · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2005 · 68 · 140510.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R03 ↗
21. Paluch · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 214010.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2140 ↗
22. Paluch · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 1998 · 10 · 413110.1088/0953-8984/10/19/001 ↗
23. Drozd-Rzoska · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20 · 24410310.1088/0953-8984/20/24/244103 ↗
24. Mukherjee · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 116 · 457710.1063/1.1445747 ↗
25. Thermodynamics of Point Defects and Their Relation with Bulk Properties
26. Papathanassiou · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 443210.1103/PhysRevB.58.4432 ↗
27. Papathanassiou · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 1603810.1103/PhysRevB.58.16038 ↗
28. Varotsos · Phys. Rev. B · 1978 · 18 · 268310.1103/PhysRevB.18.2683 ↗
29. Varotsos · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 93810.1103/PhysRevB.13.938 ↗
30. Varotsos · Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 30 · 730510.1103/PhysRevB.30.7305 ↗
31. Varotsos · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 12350310.1063/1.2745359 ↗
32. See Ref. [25], Chapter 10.
33. We choose |κTact| ≈ 1/B0, in order to simplify the calculations. Even if we set |κTact| to be less than the bulk compressibility, a correction term may appear (i.e., |κTact|=λ/B, where 0<λ<1) but this will not change the qualitative features of the resulting scaling equation.
34. A. Grzybowski, M. Paluch, and K. Grzybowska “Comment on ‘Density scaling of the diffusion coefficient at various pressures in viscous liquids” Phys. Rev. E (in print).
35. A.N. Papathanassiou and I. Sakellis, arXiv:0909.3740v1 [cond-mat.soft].
36. Papathanassiou · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 15450310.1063/1.3382645 ↗
37. T. S. Schrøder, U. R. Pedersen and J. C. Dyre, Phs. Rev. E 80, 041502 (2009): Herein, an exponential-like equation is used as a guide to the eye to match the density scaling of the diffusion coefficient data, but a physical justification for the selection of the fitting equation is lacking.10.1103/PhysRevE.80.041502 ↗
38. In Ref [13], a reduced diffusion coefficient D⁎r ∝ ρ1/3T-1/2D was actually used. As explained therein, the use of D⁎r, instead of D*, yields very similar values of γ, but the quality of scaling for D* is slightly superior. Here, we worked on D*, for reasons of simplicity; if D⁎r is used instead of D*, a correction term will appear in Eq. (8), which is practically negligible (i.e., when plotted on the same diagram, they superposition each other and can hardly be distinguished).
39. Coslovich · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130 · 01450810.1063/1.3054635 ↗
40. Dyre · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 53 · 217110.1103/PhysRevB.53.2171 ↗