Separation and Quantitation of Plant and Insect Carbohydrate Isomers Found on the Surface of Cotton
Source abstract
Abstract
Certain levels of the carbohydrates melezitose and trehalulose deposited on cotton surfaces are indicative of either whitefly or aphid contamination, which may cause problems during cotton processing. Raffinose and sucrose are isomers of melezitose and trehalulose, respectively, making it difficult to fully separate them via ion chromatography (IC), especially when analysis time is shortened. We have successfully developed an IC method to separate the retention peaks of melezitose from raffinose and trehalulose from sucrose, with baseline resolution and improved quantitation of these sugars. This improved separation may elucidate useful information about constituent sugars on cotton, aiding in the identification of carbohydrates possibly contributing to stickiness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Research in Cotton Cultivation · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
USDA, ARS
Fiber Physics LLC
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Ellsworth P.C. · Sticky Cotton Sources and Solutions · 1999 · 1156 · 1
2. 10.1007/BF0219772010.1007/BF02197720 ↗
3. Hequet E. F. · 2006
4. 10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.02110.1016/j.aca.2003.10.021 ↗
5. 10.1366/00037020577478321410.1366/000370205774783214 ↗
6. Hendrix D.L. · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology · 1992 · 101 · 2310.1016/0300-9629(92)90622-W ↗
7. Gamble G. R. · Journal of Cotton Science · 2002 · 6 · 143
8. Funk P. · 2007
9. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.04710.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.047 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051750505380610.1177/0040517505053806 ↗
11. Gamble G. R. · Journal of Cotton Science · 2003 · 7 · 45
12. CIRAD, Carbohydrate Separation Report Analysis. Melezitose Carbohydrate Separation from Cotton Sample Water Extract; Rodgers D.J., Ed. 2014; p 2.
13. Brushwood D.E. · 1993
14. Gamble G. R. · Physiology · 2001 · 5 · 169
15. 10.1093/chromsci/27.8.49610.1093/chromsci/27.8.496 ↗
16. 10.1021/jf030178f10.1021/jf030178f ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-005-9000-910.1007/s10570-005-9000-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00092-710.1016/S1096-4959(03)00092-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.11510.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.115 ↗
20. Gamble G. R. · 2001 · 1
21. 10.1007/s13361-013-0657-210.1007/s13361-013-0657-2 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00216-009-2865-y10.1007/s00216-009-2865-y ↗
23. Brushwood D.E., Perkins H.H. In Cotton Plant Sugars and Insect Honeydew Characterized by High Performance Liquid Chromatography; Beltwide Cotton Conference: Memphis, TN, USA, 1996; p 4.
24. Godfrey L.D., Goodell P.B., Natwick E.T., Havilland D.R., Barlow V.M., Grafton-Cardwell E.E., Toscano N.C. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines, http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/selectnewpest.cotton.html (accessed August 2015).
25. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)88014-010.1016/S0031-9422(00)88014-0 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-94-011-5716-2_5610.1007/978-94-011-5716-2_56 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00216-003-2087-710.1007/s00216-003-2087-7 ↗