Bond valence in silicate glasses
Source abstract
Abstract
In contrast with crystals, glass structure cannot be unambiguously determined by experimental techniques, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are often used to model such systems. Ion–ion interactions are modeled by empirical potentials, which are validated by comparison between the structural information extracted from experimental results and the simulated structure. Bond valence (BV) theory is often used to check the reliability of experimentally determined crystal structures. However, it has not been applied in a similar fashion to the results of MD simulations of disordered systems. To illustrate the use of BV theory in silicate glasses, BV calculations were performed in a 1500 atom-3D-periodic MD simulation box of a glass of composition CaO–FeO–2SiO2 (mol%) with two sets of Born–Mayer–Huggins potentials. The structural models are analyzed from the point of viewof BV theory. The BV sums around the 1500 atoms showthat the BV model is globally verified. In addition, w e showthat the BV sums are sensitive to changes in MD potential parameters and can thus be used to test the plausibility of the MD model of a silicate glass. This newstrategy opens possibilities in the derivation of more robust and constrained structural models of silicate glasses and melts. 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Farges · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1991 · 55 · 156310.1016/0016-7037(91)90128-R ↗
2. F. Farges, C.W. Ponader, G.E. Brown Jr., in: S.S. Hasnain (Ed.), XAFS VI, Sixth International Conference on X-ray Absorption Fine Structure, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1991, p. 309
3. Farges · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1991 · 55 · 330310.1016/0016-7037(91)90490-V ↗
4. Farges · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1992 · 56 · 420510.1016/0016-7037(92)90261-G ↗
5. Brown · Rev. Mineral. · 1995 · 32 · 317
6. Farges · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. · 1996 · 60 · 302310.1016/0016-7037(96)00144-5 ↗
7. Farges · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1996 · 60 · 303910.1016/0016-7037(96)00145-7 ↗
8. Farges · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1996 · 60 · 305510.1016/0016-7037(96)00146-9 ↗
9. Farges · Am. Mineral. · 1999 · 84 · 156210.2138/am-1999-1009 ↗
10. Farges · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 2001 · 65 · 166510.1016/S0016-7037(00)00625-6 ↗
11. Pauling · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1929 · 51 · 101010.1021/ja01379a006 ↗
12. de Jong · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1980 · 44 · 49110.1016/0016-7037(80)90046-0 ↗
13. de Jong · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1980 · 44 · 162710.1016/0016-7037(80)90216-1 ↗
14. Gibbs · J. Phys. Chem. · 1987 · 91 · 534710.1021/j100304a042 ↗
15. Boisen · Phys. Chem. Miner. · 1988 · 15 · 40910.1007/BF00311046 ↗
16. Gibbs · Rev. Mineral. Geochem. · 2001 · 42 · 34510.2138/rmg.2001.42.10 ↗
17. Preiser · Acta Cryst. B · 1999 · 55 · 69810.1107/S0108768199003961 ↗
18. Brown · Acta Crystallogr. A · 1973 · 29 · 26610.1107/S0567739473000689 ↗
19. Brown · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1985 · 41 · 24410.1107/S0108768185002063 ↗
20. Brown · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1992 · 48 · 55310.1107/S0108768192002453 ↗
21. Brese · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1991 · 47 · 19210.1107/S0108768190011041 ↗
22. Poole · Rev. Mineral. · 1995 · 32 · 563
23. Rossano · Europhys. Lett. · 2000 · 49 · 59710.1209/epl/i2000-00192-1 ↗
24. Rossano · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2000 · 273 · 4810.1016/S0022-3093(00)00124-1 ↗
25. Cormier · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 1449510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14495 ↗
26. Delaye · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2001 · 293–295 · 29010.1016/S0022-3093(01)00680-9 ↗
27. Delaye · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 1996 · 37 · 23210.1016/0921-5107(95)01495-0 ↗