journal article·2008-03

Structural characteristics of silica sonogels prepared with different proportions of TEOS and TMOS

D.R. Vollet, L.M. Nunes, D.A. Donatti, A. Ibañez Ruiz, H. Maceti

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 354· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Sonohydrolysis of mixtures of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and tetramethoxysilane (TMOS) with different TMOS/(TMOS + TEOS) molar ratio R was carried out to obtain ∼2.0 × 10 −3 mol SiO 2 /cm 3 and ∼86%-volume liquid phase wet gels. Aerogels were obtained by supercritical CO 2 extraction in autoclave. The samples were analyzed by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and nitrogen adsorption. The structure of the wet gels can be described as a mass fractal structure with fractal dimension D ∼ 2.2 and characteristic length ξ increasing from ∼4.6 nm for pure TEOS to ∼6.4 nm for pure TMOS. A fraction of the porosity is eliminated with the supercritical process. The fundamental role of the TMOS/(TMOS + TEOS) molar ratio on the structure of the aerogels is to increase the porosity and the pore mean size as R changes from pure TEOS to pure TMOS. The supercritical process increases the mass fractal dimension and shortens the fractality domain in the mesopore region. A secondary structure appearing in the micropore region of the aerogels can be described as a mass/surface fractal structure with correlated mass fractal dimension D m ∼ 2.6 and surface fractal dimension D s ∼ 2.3.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Brinker · 1990
2. Tarasevich · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 1984 · 63 · 500
3. Morita · J. Lumin. · 2003 · 102&103 · 60810.1016/S0022-2313(02)00609-9 ↗
4. Sujatha Devi · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2004 · 336 · 12810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.02.003 ↗
5. Litrán · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2004 · 333 · 32710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.10.003 ↗
6. Feng · Physica B · 2004 · 350 · 34810.1016/j.physb.2004.04.071 ↗
7. Ahola · Int. J. Pharm. · 2000 · 195 · 21910.1016/S0378-5173(99)00403-2 ↗
8. Radin · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 104310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.004 ↗
9. Colomer · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2001 · 290 · 9310.1016/S0022-3093(01)00815-8 ↗
10. Zarzycki · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1990 · 121 · 11010.1016/0022-3093(90)90114-2 ↗
11. Blanco · Appl. Organomet. Chem. · 1999 · 13 · 39910.1002/(SICI)1099-0739(199905)13:5<399::AID-AOC825>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
12. Donatti · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 2158210.1021/jp0643552 ↗
13. de la Rosa-Fox · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1990 · 121 · 21110.1016/0022-3093(90)90134-8 ↗
14. Esquivias · 1987 · 255
15. Zarzychi · Heterogen. Chem. Rev. · 1994 · 1 · 243
16. Esquivias · 1986 · 409
17. Wagh · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 57 · 21410.1016/S0254-0584(98)00217-X ↗
18. Donatti · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1996 · 204 · 30110.1016/S0022-3093(96)00617-5 ↗
19. Jarzębski · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1995 · 190 · 19810.1016/0022-3093(95)00276-6 ↗
20. Donatti · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 7110.1103/PhysRevB.71.014203 ↗
21. Gregg · 1967
22. Schaefer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 138310.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1383 ↗
23. Vacher · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 650010.1103/PhysRevB.37.6500 ↗
24. General theory
25. Leofanti · Catal. Today · 1990 · 41 · 20710.1016/S0920-5861(98)00050-9 ↗
26. Scherer · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1995 · 186 · 30910.1016/0022-3093(95)00058-5 ↗
27. Reichenauer · J. Colloid Interf. Sci. · 2001 · 236 · 38510.1006/jcis.2000.7419 ↗
28. Vollet · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69
29. Pfeifer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88
30. Bale · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 59610.1103/PhysRevLett.53.596 ↗