journal article·2001-03

Chemical durability of commercial silicate glasses. I. Material characterization

Amy B Jedlicka, Alexis G Clare

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 281· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Six commercial silicate glasses; silica, sodalime silicate, two fiberglass compositions and two Bioglass® compositions were subjected to three solutions: distilled water, Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline solution and Ham's F-12 1x cell culture media under the exact experimental conditions that would be encountered during a cell culture study. For companion, a binary sodium silicate glass was also exposed. Weight loss, diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and potentiometric titration were used to determine the chemical evolution of the substrates during a typical period for cell culturing. The silica, sodalime silicate and high-silica fiberglass material showed only small changes in all cases except for differences in OH active site concentration. The bioglass compositions and the low-silica fiberglass exhibited solution-dependent dynamic surface chemistry. The sodium silicate was too dynamic for even the most aggressive buffering system. The purpose of this study was to elucidate cell behavior to be reported in a later paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Building materials and conservation · Pigment Synthesis and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Sanders · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1973 · 56 · 37310.1111/j.1151-2916.1973.tb12689.x ↗
2. D.E. Clark, C.G. Pantano, L.L. Hench, Corrosion of Glass, Magazines for Industry, New York, 1979
3. E.C. Etheridge, PhD thesis, The University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1977
4. Sanders · Appl. Spectrosc. · 1974 · 21 · 24710.1366/000370274774332623 ↗
5. Zhou · Mater. Lett. · 1990 · 9 · 20710.1016/0167-577X(90)90131-5 ↗
6. Lee · Mater. Lett. · 1996 · 28 · 17910.1016/0167-577X(96)00056-0 ↗
7. U. Senturk, PhD thesis, Alfred University, Alfred, New York, 1997
8. Uchino · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1989 · 72 · 217310.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06051.x ↗
9. M.R. Filgueiras, G. LaTorre, L.L. Hench, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (4) 44510.1002/jbm.820270405 ↗
10. L.L. Hench, in: T. Yamamuro, L.L. Hench, J. Wilson (Eds.), The Handbook of Bioactive Ceramics, Vol. I, Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics, CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1990. p. 7
11. L. Bergstrom, in: R.J. Pugh, L. Bergstrom (Eds.), Surface and Colloid Chemistry in Advanced Ceramic Processing, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994, p. 71
12. Varshneya · 1994
13. Hench · J. Non-Cryst Solids · 1975 · 19 · 2710.1016/0022-3093(75)90067-8 ↗
14. Clark · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1976 · 59 · 6210.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09391.x ↗
15. L.L. Hench, O. Anderson, in: L.L. Hench, J. Wilson (Eds.), An Introduction to Bioceramics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1993, p. 4110.1142/9789814317351_0003 ↗
16. P. Ducheyne, S. Brown, N. Blumenthal, L.L. Hench, A. Krajewski, G. Palavit, A. Ravaglioli, S. Steinerman, S. Windeler, in: P. Ducheyne, J.E. Lemons (Eds.), Bioceramics: Materials Characteristic versus in vivo Behavior, The New York Academy of Science, New York, 1988, p. 257
17. Hench · Science · 1984 · 226 · 63010.1126/science.6093253 ↗