journal article·2015-03

Microstructure and fracture surface of the two-component melt-spun amorphous/amorphous composite

Mirosława Różycka, Krzysztof Ziewiec, Artur Błachowski, Krzysztof Ruebenbauer, Krystian Prusik

Publisher page

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to identify the differences in the final microstructure, fracture and short range order of the Ni 55Fe 20Cu 5P 10B 10 alloy melt-spun after the ejection of the homogeneous liquid from the standard single chamber crucible and from the crucible with double chamber as the flux of two liquids i.e.: Ni–Fe–B and Ni–Cu–P. The preparation of the alloys involved remelting Ni 55Fe 20Cu 5P 10B 10, Ni 40Fe 40B 20 and Ni 70Cu 10P 20 compositions in the arc furnace under titanium gettered argon atmosphere starting from pure metals 99.95 wt.% Ni, 99.95 wt.% Fe, 99.95 wt.% Cu and Ni–B, Fe–B, Ni–P, and Cu–P master alloys. The Ni 55Fe 20Cu 5P 10B 10 melt-spun ribbons were obtained by means of two methods: the first one was melt-spun from a traditional single chamber crucible while the second one was produced using two component melt spinning (TCMS) performed in the protective helium atmosphere. The research was conducted by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Mössbauer spectroscopy. The results of the microstructure examination show that the TCMS alloy is amorphous/amorphous composite and boundaries between the stripes of the differentiated chemical composition coincide with the features of the ductile fracture. The Mössbauer spectroscopy of the alloys confirms that the special feature of the TCMS alloy is that it is composed of the regions with differentiated chemical composition.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Pigment Synthesis and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Warlimont · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2001 · 304–306 · 6110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01450-7 ↗
2. Makino · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1997 · 226–228 · 59410.1016/S0921-5093(96)10693-6 ↗
3. Kulik · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2001 · 287 · 14510.1016/S0022-3093(01)00627-5 ↗
4. Wang · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2005 · 351 · 148110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.03.024 ↗
5. Ashby · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 32110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.051 ↗
6. Schäfer · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2000 · 215–216 · 65210.1016/S0304-8853(00)00252-3 ↗
7. Liaw · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 6910.1007/s11837-010-0035-5 ↗
8. Kündig · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 244110.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.036 ↗
9. Park · Scr. Mater. · 2007 · 56 · 19710.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.10.020 ↗
10. Mattern · Scripta Materialia · 2007 · 57 · 2910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.03.016 ↗
11. Ziewiec · Solid State Phenom. · 2013 · 203–204 · 36110.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.203-204.361 ↗
12. Ziewiec · J. Alloys Compd. · 2014 · 615 · S2910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.190 ↗
13. Griesche · Scr. Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 139510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.08.024 ↗
14. Jiang · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2011 · 205 · 427410.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.033 ↗
15. Spaepen · Acta Metall. · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
16. Concustell · Scr. Mater. · 2007 · 56 · 8510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.09.026 ↗
17. Szuecs · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 150710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00068-4 ↗