journal article·2012-02

Further investigations of the effect of replacing lithium by sodium on lithium silicate scintillating glass efficiency

M. Bliss, P.M. Aker, C.F. Windisch

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 358· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Ce 3+ doped lithium ( 6 Li) silicate glasses are thermal neutron detectors. Prior work showed that when sodium (Na) is substituted for Li the scintillation efficiency, under beta particle stimulation, increased and then decreased as the sodium (Na) content was increased. When all the 6 Li was replaced by Na no scintillation was observed. Raman spectra, acquired using a visible excitation source, provided no evidence of anomalous behavior. SEM microscopy did show some phase separation, but there was no obvious correlation with the scintillation efficiency. We have reexamined these glass samples using deep UV Raman excitation which reduces fluorescence interference. The newly acquired spectra show evidence of phase separation in the glasses. Specifically we see a peak at 800 cm − 1 Raman shift which can be assigned to a vitreous silica moiety that results from phase separation. There is a strong correlation between this peak's area, the scintillation efficiency, and the Na content. The observed trend suggests that phase separation enhances scintillation and addition of Na reduces the amount of phase separation. We also see evidence of at least two defect structures that can be tentatively assigned to a three-membered ring structure and an oxygen vacancy. The latter is fairly strongly correlated with enhanced scintillation efficiency.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Bliss · 1995 · 117
2. Wojtowicz · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 880
3. Bliss · Nucl. Instrum. Methods · 1994 · A 345 · 9510.1016/0168-9002(94)90975-X ↗
4. Windisch · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2011 · 357 · 217010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.02.046 ↗
5. Matson · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1983 · 58 · 32310.1016/0022-3093(83)90032-7 ↗
6. Sharma · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1984 · 68 · 9910.1016/0022-3093(84)90037-1 ↗
7. Hautojarvi · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1978 · 29 · 36510.1016/0022-3093(78)90157-6 ↗
8. Pasquarello · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 514510.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5145 ↗
9. Galeener · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 242910.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2429 ↗
10. Walrafen · Appl. Spectrosc. · 1975 · 29 · 17910.1366/000370275774455301 ↗
11. Haller · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1974 · 57 · 12010.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb10832.x ↗
12. Greaves · J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 2 · 299
13. Walrafen · Appl. Spectrosc. · 1975 · 29 · 33710.1366/000370275774455969 ↗
14. Severs · Chem. Geol. · 2007 · 237 · 35810.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.07.008 ↗
15. Grisom · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1985 · 73 · 5110.1016/0022-3093(85)90337-0 ↗
16. Pacchioni · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 609010.1103/PhysRevB.58.6090 ↗
17. Arnold · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 1973 · NS-20 · 22010.1109/TNS.1973.4327397 ↗
18. Griscom · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1984 · 68 · 30110.1016/0022-3093(84)90013-9 ↗
19. Griscom · J. Appl. Phys. · 1985 · 58 · 242410.1063/1.335931 ↗
20. Li · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1990 · 126 · 17310.1016/0022-3093(90)91036-Q ↗
21. Smith · Appl. Opt. · 2000 · 39 · 577810.1364/AO.39.005778 ↗
22. Ong · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 133 · 07470810.1063/1.3469978 ↗
23. Mawhinney · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1997 · 101 · 120210.1021/jp963322r ↗
24. Shkrob · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2000 · 262 · 3510.1016/S0022-3093(99)00669-9 ↗
25. Siu · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 317310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3173 ↗
26. Virgo · Science · 1980 · 208 · 137110.1126/science.208.4450.1371 ↗
27. Brawer · J. Chem. Phys. · 1975 · 63 · 242110.1063/1.431671 ↗
28. Sen · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 82210.1103/PhysRevB.50.822 ↗