Breakdown of the fractional Stokes–Einstein relation in silicate liquids
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The fractional Stokes–Einstein relation postulates a direct relationship between conductivity and shear flow. Like viscosity, the electrical resistivity of a glass-forming liquid exhibits a non-Arrhenius scaling with temperature. However, while both viscosity and resistivity are non-Arrhenius, here we show that these two properties follow distinct functional forms. Through analysis of 821 unique silicate liquids, we show that viscosity is best represented using the Mauro–Yue–Ellison–Gupta–Allan (MYEGA) model, whereas the resistivity of the same compositions more closely follows the Avramov–Milchev (AM) equation. Our results point to two fundamentally different mechanisms governing viscous flow and conductivity and therefore cast doubt on the general validity of the fractional Stokes–Einstein relation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Material Dynamics and Properties · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Dyre · J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 64 · 245610.1063/1.341681 ↗
2. Dyre · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2000 · 72 · 87310.1103/RevModPhys.72.873 ↗
3. Schrøder · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 02590110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.025901 ↗
4. Dyre · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2009 · 72 · 04650110.1088/0034-4885/72/4/046501 ↗
5. Pasveer · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 16520910.1103/PhysRevB.74.165209 ↗
6. Sidebottom · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 365310.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3653 ↗
7. Sidebottom · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · S158510.1088/0953-8984/15/16/308 ↗
8. Sidebottom · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 99910.1103/RevModPhys.81.999 ↗
9. Pfeiffer · Solid State Ionics · 1998 · 105 · 27710.1016/S0167-2738(97)00475-X ↗
10. Stickel · J. Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 104 · 204310.1063/1.470961 ↗
11. Noda · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 460310.1021/jp004132q ↗
12. Xu · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 617010.1021/jp0275894 ↗
13. Vila · Fluid Phase Equilib. · 2006 · 242 · 14110.1016/j.fluid.2006.01.022 ↗
14. Electrical conductivity of glass melts
15. Fluegel · 2007
16. Scherer · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1992 · 75 · 106010.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb05537.x ↗
17. Voronel · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 263010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2630 ↗
18. Veliyulin · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 1999 · 11 · 877310.1088/0953-8984/11/45/302 ↗
19. Cherif · Fluid Phase Equilib. · 2007 · 251 · 7110.1016/j.fluid.2006.10.027 ↗
20. Harris · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 131 · 05450310.1063/1.3183951 ↗
21. Avramov · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1988 · 104 · 25310.1016/0022-3093(88)90396-1 ↗
22. Avramov · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 74510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.02.009 ↗
23. Mauro · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2009 · 106 · 1978010.1073/pnas.0911705106 ↗
24. Phillips · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1979 · 34 · 15310.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-4 ↗
25. Boolchand · Philos. Mag. · 2005 · 85 · 382310.1080/14786430500256425 ↗
26. Mauro · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 2011 · 90 · 31
27. Gupta · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130 · 09450310.1063/1.3077168 ↗
28. Mauro · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130 · 23450310.1063/1.3152432 ↗
29. Smedskjaer · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 535810.1021/cm1016799 ↗
30. Smedskjaer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 11550310.1103/PhysRevLett.105.115503 ↗
31. De Michele · Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 63 · 03670110.1103/PhysRevE.63.036701 ↗