journal article·2008-11

Morphological and mechanical properties of hybrid matrices of polysiloxane–polyvinyl alcohol prepared by sol–gel technique and their potential for immobilizing enzyme

Júlio C. Santos, Ariela V. Paula, Cláudia G.F. Rocha, Gisele F.M. Nunes, Heizir F. de Castro

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 354· Issue 42-44
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Hybrid matrices of polysiloxane–polyvinyl alcohol (POS–PVA) were prepared by sol–gel technique using different concentrations of the organic component (polyvinyl alcohol, PVA) in the synthesis medium. The goal was to prepare carriers for immobilizing enzyme by taking into consideration properties as hardness, mean pore diameter, specific surface area and pore size distribution. The matrices were activated with sodium metaperiodate to render functional groups for binding the lipase from Candida rugosa , used here as a study model. Results showed that low proportion of PVA gave POS–PVA with low surface area and pore volume, although with higher hardness. The chemical activation decreased the pore volume and increased the pore size with a decrease on the surface area of about 60–75%. The matrices for enzyme immobilization were chosen considering the best combination of high surface area and hardness. Thus, the POS–PVA prepared with 5.56 × 10 −5 M of PVA with a surface area of 123 m 2 /g and hardness of 71 HV (50 gf 30 s) was shown to be suitable to immobilize the lipase, with an immobilization yield of about 40%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Yano · Mater. Sci. Eng. C – Bio. Supramol. Syst. · 1998 · 6 · 7510.1016/S0928-4931(98)00043-5 ↗
2. José · Quim. Nova · 2005 · 28 · 28110.1590/S0100-40422005000200020 ↗
3. 2007
4. Kato · Mater. Sci. Eng. C – Bio. Supramol. Syst. · 2002 · 66 · 221
5. Gupta · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2007 · 22 · 238710.1016/j.bios.2006.12.025 ↗
6. Soares · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 346910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.03.084 ↗
7. Melo · React. Funct. Polym. · 2008 · 68 · 31510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.08.007 ↗
8. Hasan · Enzyme Microb. Technol. · 2006 · 39 · 23510.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.016 ↗
9. Mateo · Enzyme Microb. Technol. · 2007 · 40 · 145110.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.01.018 ↗
10. Santos · Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces · 2008 · 61 · 22910.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.08.006 ↗
11. Paula · J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. · 2007 · 82 · 28110.1002/jctb.1669 ↗
12. Freitas · J. Brazil. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 18 · 136010.1590/S0103-50532007000700011 ↗
13. Soares · Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. · 1999 · 77–79 · 74510.1385/ABAB:79:1-3:745 ↗
14. Mansur · Polymer · 2004 · 45 · 719310.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.036 ↗
15. Pereira · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2000 · 273 · 18010.1016/S0022-3093(00)00166-6 ↗
16. Carneiro da Cunha · Biotechnol. Technol. · 1999 · 13 · 40310.1023/A:1008913824571 ↗
17. Ramos · Powder Technol. · 1998 · 99 · 7910.1016/S0032-5910(98)00061-8 ↗
18. Tischer · Trends Biotechnol. · 1999 · 17 · 32610.1016/S0167-7799(99)01322-0 ↗
19. Kourkoutas · Food Microbiol. · 2004 · 21 · 37710.1016/j.fm.2003.10.005 ↗