journal article·2014-11

Correlation between atomic-level structure, packing efficiency and glass-forming ability in Cu–Zr metallic glasses

K.N. Lad

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The local structure and atomic packing in Cu x Zr 100 − x (46 ≤ x ≤ 70) alloys have been investigated using classical molecular dynamics. We convincingly demonstrate that the atomic packing efficiency of the polytetrahedral clusters strongly correlates with the glass-forming ability. It is found that the full-icosahedra ( ), which is considered to be a key local structural feature associated with the glass formation in metallic alloys, alone cannot explain the compositional dependence of glass-forming ability. We suggest that the population of the so-called defected icosahedra ( ), apart from the full-icosahedra, could be crucial to account for the observed high atomic packing efficiency in the best glass-forming compositions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Material Dynamics and Properties · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Cheng · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 113913
2. Jakse · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 11310410.1063/1.2976428 ↗
3. Peng · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 2190110.1063/1.3282800 ↗
4. Lad · J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 136 · 10450910.1063/1.3692610 ↗
5. Miracle · Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. · 2007 · 32 · 62910.1557/mrs2007.124 ↗
6. Moritz · Euro. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 5600210.1209/0295-5075/100/56002 ↗
7. Ward · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 13420510.1103/PhysRevB.88.134205 ↗
8. Li · Science · 2008 · 322 · 181610.1126/science.1163062 ↗
9. Bendert · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 18590110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.185901 ↗
10. Yang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 10550210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.105502 ↗
11. Yu · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 212410.1038/srep02124 ↗
12. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
13. Mendelev · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 4350110.1063/1.2769157 ↗
14. Cheng · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 01420710.1103/PhysRevB.78.014207 ↗
15. Tool · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1946 · 29 · 24010.1111/j.1151-2916.1946.tb11592.x ↗
16. Altounian · J. Appl. Phys. · 1982 · 53 · 475510.1063/1.331304 ↗
17. Altounian · Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 27 · 414910.1103/PhysRevB.27.4149 ↗
18. Cheng · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.245501 ↗
19. Mattern · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 485 · 16310.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.111 ↗
20. Sachdev · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 194710.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1947 ↗
21. Finney · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1970 · 319 · 47910.1098/rspa.1970.0189 ↗
22. Nature · 1977 · 266 · 30910.1038/266309a0 ↗
23. Stillinger · Phys. Rev. A · 1982 · 25 · 97810.1103/PhysRevA.25.978 ↗
24. Van Oosterom · IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. · 1983 · BME-30 · 12510.1109/TBME.1983.325207 ↗
25. Medvedev · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1987 · 94 · 40210.1016/S0022-3093(87)80074-1 ↗
26. Wu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 02190110.1063/1.3464164 ↗
27. Hao · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 05351110.1063/1.3298896 ↗
28. Li · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 18420110.1103/PhysRevB.80.184201 ↗