journal article·2006-11

Sugar bioprotective effects on thermal denaturation of lysozyme: Insights from Raman scattering experiments and molecular dynamics simulation

R. Ionov, A. Hédoux, Y. Guinet, P. Bordat, A. Lerbret, F. Affouard, D. Prevost, M. Descamps

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 352· Issue 42-49
Publisher page

Abstract

The bioprotective properties of trehalose, sucrose and maltose on lysozyme protein are studied using Raman spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. The temperature dependencies of the α-helical unfolding processes are determined in presence of different sugars and at various concentrations using the amide I band. The energies of stabilization and acting forces are discussed. The problem of the threshold sugar concentration needed to protect proteins is addressed. The results point out that the three sugars exhibit very similar bioprotective behaviors in the investigated temperature and concentration ranges and suggest that the difference between their respective effects arise mostly from the different denaturated states of lysozyme in the three sugar solutions. Indeed, trehalose gives rise to a significantly more important shift of the denaturation temperature Tm and of the Gibbs net free energy Δ(ΔGND) of stabilization of lysozyme with respect to the two other sugars.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Protein Structure and Dynamics · Enzyme Structure and Function · Proteins in Food Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Darnell · 1986
2. Crowe · Cryobiology · 2001 · 43 · 8910.1006/cryo.2001.2353 ↗
3. Angell · Chem. Rev. · 2002 · 102 · 262710.1021/cr000689q ↗
4. Crowe · Cryobiology · 1994 · 31 · 35510.1006/cryo.1994.1043 ↗
5. Allison · Arch. Biochem. Biophys. · 1999 · 365 · 28910.1006/abbi.1999.1175 ↗
6. Branca · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 134710.1021/jp983470c ↗
7. Xie · Biophys. Chem. · 1997 · 64 · 2510.1016/S0301-4622(96)02222-3 ↗
8. Wang · Int. J. Pharm. · 1999 · 185 · 12910.1016/S0378-5173(99)00152-0 ↗
9. Robertson · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 125110.1021/cr960383c ↗
10. Kaushuk · J. Biol. Chem. · 2003 · 278 · 2645810.1074/jbc.M300815200 ↗
11. Kaushuk · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 705810.1021/jp981119l ↗
12. Jaenicke · Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London · 1990 · 326 · 535
13. Pace · FASEB J. · 1996 · 10 · 7510.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566551 ↗
14. Volkin · 1989
15. Dimitrov · Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. · 1997 · 27 · 57610.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199704)27:4<576::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
16. Ionov · Biophys. J. · 2000 · 78 · 302610.1016/S0006-3495(00)76841-X ↗
17. Pelton · Anal. Biochem. · 2000 · 277 · 16710.1006/abio.1999.4320 ↗
18. Branca · J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 111 · 28110.1063/1.479288 ↗
19. Bordat · Europhys. Lett. · 2004 · 65 · 4110.1209/epl/i2003-10052-0 ↗
20. Ekdawi-Sever · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2003 · 107 · 93610.1021/jp020187b ↗
21. Diamond · J. Mol. Biol. · 1974 · 82 · 37110.1016/0022-2836(74)90598-1 ↗
22. Peakfit, version 4 for Win32, Jandel Scientific Software (AISN Software, Inc.).
23. Doster · 2004
24. Brooks · J. Comput. Chem. · 1983 · 4 · 18710.1002/jcc.540040211 ↗
25. Mackerell · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 358610.1021/jp973084f ↗
26. Berendsen · J. Chem. Phys. · 1987 · 91 · 626910.1021/j100308a038 ↗
27. Vaney · Acta Cryst. D · 1996 · 52 · 50510.1107/S090744499501674X ↗
28. Sterpone · J. Mol. Biol. · 2001 · 311 · 40910.1006/jmbi.2001.4860 ↗
29. Bellissent-Funel · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 734710.1021/ja981329b ↗
30. Luzar · Nature · 1996 · 379 · 5510.1038/379055a0 ↗
31. Garcia · J. Comp. Chem. · 1993 · 14 · 139610.1002/jcc.540141116 ↗
32. He · Nature · 1992 · 358 · 20910.1038/358209a0 ↗
33. Caliskan · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 121 · 197810.1063/1.1764491 ↗
34. Cordone · Biophys. J. · 1999 · 76 · 104310.1016/S0006-3495(99)77269-3 ↗
35. Sastry · Nature · 1998 · 383 · 55410.1038/31189 ↗
36. Magazù · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 185110.1021/jp002155z ↗