How do dynamic heterogeneities evolve in time?
Source abstract
Abstract
We present simulations of a hard disc system and analyze the time evolution of the dynamic heterogeneities. We characterize the time evolution of slow regions and slow particles individually. The motion of slow clusters turns out to be very restricted, i.e. a cluster is generated and annihilated in a spatial region four times the size of its maximum extent. The residual motion of the cluster can be traced back to subdiffusive motion of the constituent particles and the process of absorption and loss of adjacent particles. The subdiffusive dynamics is independent of how long the particles remain slow. Clusters of fast particles show an even smaller reach, which seems to be due to their short life time.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Angell · Science · 1995 · 267 · 192410.1126/science.267.5206.1924 ↗
2. Ngai · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2000 · 275 · 710.1016/S0022-3093(00)00238-6 ↗
3. Kob · J. Phys.: Condes. Matter · 1999 · 11 · R85
4. Sillescu · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1999 · 243 · 8110.1016/S0022-3093(98)00831-X ↗
5. Fujara · Z. Phys. B: Condens. Mat. · 1992 · 88 · 19510.1007/BF01323572 ↗
6. Schmidt-Rohr · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 66 · 302010.1103/PhysRevLett.66.3020 ↗
7. Yang · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 115 · 267610.1063/1.1380206 ↗
8. Ediger · J. Chem. Phys · 1995 · 103 · 752
9. Schiener · Science · 1996 · 274 · 75210.1126/science.274.5288.752 ↗
10. Russell · Nature · 2000 · 408 · 69510.1038/35047037 ↗
11. Deschenes · Science · 2001 · 292 · 25510.1126/science.1056430 ↗
12. Tracht · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 272710.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2727 ↗
13. Tracht · Appl. Magn. Reson. · 1999 · 17 · 22710.1007/BF03162163 ↗
14. Perera · J. Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 104 · 236910.1063/1.470932 ↗
15. Kob · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 282710.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2827 ↗
16. Heuer · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 106 · 617610.1063/1.473240 ↗
17. Glotzer · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1999 · 11 · A285
18. Yamamoto · Phys. Rev. E · 1998 · 58 · 351510.1103/PhysRevE.58.3515 ↗
19. Götze · 1989
20. Bennemann · Nature · 1999 · 399 · 24610.1038/20406 ↗
21. Donati · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 60 · 310710.1103/PhysRevE.60.3107 ↗
22. Doliwa · Phys. Rev. E · 2000 · 61 · 689810.1103/PhysRevE.61.6898 ↗
23. Doliwa · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1999 · 11 · A277
24. Ediger · Science · 2001 · 292 · 23310.1126/science.1060312 ↗
25. Gavrilova · Int. J. Comput. Math. · 1996 · 61 · 4910.1080/00207169608804499 ↗
26. Rabani · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 107 · 686710.1063/1.474927 ↗
27. Cicerone · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1997 · 101 · 872710.1021/jp970595t ↗
28. Diezemann · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 107 · 1011210.1063/1.474148 ↗
29. Chen · Phys. Rev. E · 1997 · 56 · 423110.1103/PhysRevE.56.4231 ↗
30. Qian · J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 110 · 451410.1063/1.478334 ↗
31. Heuer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 285110.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2851 ↗
32. Böhmer · Europhys. Lett. · 1996 · 36 · 5510.1209/epl/i1996-00186-5 ↗
33. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 417710.1021/jp984149x ↗
34. Büchner · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 216810.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2168 ↗