journal article·2008-05

Peculiarity of constant photocurrent method for silicon films with mixed amorphous–nanocrystalline structure

A.G. Kazanskii, Guanglin Kong, Xiangbo Zeng, Huiying Hao, Fengzhen Liu

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 354· Issue 19-25
Publisher page

Abstract

The results of conductivity, photoconductivity and constant photocurrent method absorption measurements by DC and AC methods in hydrogenated silicon films with mixed amorphous-nanocrystalline structure are presented. A series of diphasic silicon films was deposited by very high frequency plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition technique, using different hydrogen dilution ratios of silane. The increase of hydrogen dilution ratio results in five orders of magnitude increase of conductivity and a sharp increase of grain volume fraction. The comparison of the absorption spectra obtained by DC and AC methods showed that they are similar for silicon films with the predominantly amorphous structure and films with high grain volume fraction. However we found a dramatic discrepancy between the absorption spectra obtained by DC and AC constant photocurrent methods in silicon films deposited in the regime of the structure transition from amorphous to nanocrystalline state. AC constant photocurrent method gives higher absorption coefficient than DC constant photocurrent method in the photon energy range of 1.2-1.7 eV. This result indicates the possibility of crystalline grains contribution to absorption spectra measured by AC constant photocurrent method in silicon films with intermediate crystalline grain volume fraction. (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Han · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 377610.1063/1.1555680 ↗
2. Siebke · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1998 · 227–230 · 97710.1016/S0022-3093(98)00261-0 ↗
3. Kocka · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 109710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.10.043 ↗
4. Ledinsky · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 120910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.10.072 ↗
5. Overhof · Philos. Mag. B · 1983 · 47 · 37710.1080/13642812.1983.10590676 ↗
6. Willeke · 1992 · vol. II · 55
7. Overhof · 1998 · vol. 114
8. Balberg · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 15330110.1103/PhysRevB.75.153301 ↗
9. Overhof · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1998 · 227–230 · 99210.1016/S0022-3093(98)00258-0 ↗
10. Sladek · Solid State Commun. · 1994 · 89 · 19910.1016/0038-1098(94)90682-3 ↗
11. Hasegawa · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1996 · 198–200 · 554
12. Main · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2004 · 338–340 · 22810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.02.059 ↗
13. Springett · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1973 · 31 · 146310.1103/PhysRevLett.31.1463 ↗